• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

Extracts from this document...


1. Using source A and your own knowledge explain why the D-day was such an important event of World War two? D-Day was such an important event of World War Two for numerous amounts of reasons. The term 'D-Day' actually means 'The Day'. As said by Major Elson, it is the day where "everyone does something". Major Elson fought on the Italian front, which is demonstrated on the map. D-Day was to be June 1944 minutes between night turning to morning on the 6th. The Germans had occupied France and France needed Britain, Canada and America to come together to regain the French territory for them. As well as this, Russia was fighting of Germany in the East and needed the Allies to relieve pressure. D-Day was a very important part into ending the war but other factors include the Battle of the Atlantic, the fighting in North Africa and the Battle of Britain. Arriving at Normandy using the Mulberry harbours, the Allies captured all of the five designated beaches (Omaha, Juno, Gold, Sword and Utah) despite strong German coastal defences. This is mainly due to the opposing armies having no idea to where the Allied forces would be landing because no place in France were called those names. The map shows where the troops entered France and this also clearly enforces the sheer scale of the invasion and its importance into keeping it top secret. Meanwhile, parachutists were flown in nearly 20 minutes after mid-night to capture Pegasus Bridge on the River Orne and Vier. This was important as it prevented German counter attacks from transporting troops to the beaches. As quick as they could, the Americans advanced all the way up to Cherbourg and captured it. Meanwhile, the British struggled pushing through Norman hedgerows which proved excellent cover for the defending German formations but the Allies succeeded in liberating the city of Caen in the end. ...read more.


I know, however, that there was from my own knowledge but this source doesn't imply anything of the kind-5 days into the D-Day landings and Stalin is congratulating him already, before they have really begun. So in that sense, Stalin's view isn't that reliable in the importance of D-day. On the other hand, Stalin wrote it so it has to be reliable-it is first hand evidence. He was there to witness the goings on at the time - you can't get much closer to it than that and he shows his support to Churchill. Although Russia signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact with Germany, it was under a mutual understanding and this didn't make them Allies, it merely kept the peace for a little while. So there would be no reason for this source not to be unreliable as they were Allies. Stalin also proves from the Pact that he wasn't at all with Germany because he says the 'hysterical Hitler boasted for two years that he would invade England across the channel but could not even make up his mind even to attempt carrying out the threat'. This means one of a few things. Firstly, Stalin stitched up Hitler to Churchill about Hitler's 'threat' to invade England. Secondly, he criticises him, calling him 'hysterical'. This clearly states he was never a German ally, he just used the Nazi-Soviet Pact as much as Hitler did. Stalin was Allies with Churchill and Churchill was the prominent figure who arranged D-Day. Therefore, his evidence has to be somewhat reliable and relevant to the importance of D-Day. 5. Study sources G and H. Which of these sources is more useful as evidence in assessing the significance of D-Day? On the one hand, Source H is obviously written by one of the allies rather than Germany, as it does not say as such. I know this because the way in which Geoffrey Elliot refers to the event is on a positive note. ...read more.


Furthermore, Britain sent a van around Scotland sending out more false alerts of an invasion from Scotland and they bombed Calias 3-4 times more than Normandy so the Germans would think an attack would be in Calias. They also invented special tanks to overcome German obstacles, they used reflective stripes to confuse German radar systems and they code-named the beaches so the Germans didn't know where they were going to attack. This is a drastic amount of preparations to undergo but these kinds of preparations meant that Germany didn't, in theory, stand a chance of winning. I don't think Churchill would have organised such a large-scale invasion, involving 4 main countries if he wasn't assured of a beneficial outcome. I think most of the significance of D-Day and the invasion of Normandy was, on the whole, down to exceedingly good planning and a lot of luck. However, the sources, overall, in this paper and from my own knowledge, have convinced me that D-Day and the invasion of Normandy are the most significant factors to the defeat of Germany in the Second World War. The Invasion of Normandy led to a lot of things. For instance the capture of Cherbourg, Caen and Paris. The Falaise Gap was a great achievement as it captured 50,000 German troops and from then the Allies progressed fast to the French-German border where the Battle of the Bulge took place. The Allies won this two and then it was just a race with Russia to get to Berlin. Of course there were set backs, like the weather, the struggle at Caen and the capture of Omaha beach, but that's expected in a large-scale invasion as this. But on the whole, there were a lot of achievements and the invasion accomplished their targets and the invasion was a success. Germany surrendered on the 5th May 1945 and there was victory in Europe at last. Without all the other factors that led up to D-Day and the luck involved, Normandy wouldn't have either taken place, succeeded or succeeded as well as it did. Kelly Duggan Normandy coursework LWS Yr11 Oct 2003 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * Many of the Soviet troops sent to Afghanistan were conscripts, unprepared for the fighting that they were exposed to. Their heavy weapons could not be used effectively and they were subject to constant and sudden attacks. * Increasingly there was little appetite for the war amongst the Soviet troops.

  2. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    The west bank had now become a refugee centre. There was little hope for the future. This anger and hatred towards the Israelis led to many consequences. One of them being the 3 NOs. the Arabs were not prepared to accept the Israeli victory. In august 1967 the Arab leaders had a summit.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    Censorship was a very effective method of controlling what people found out about, but it could have negative effects. If there was no news in the newspapers, people might well imagine that the situation was worse than it really was.

  2. Why was Germany Defeated in the First World War?

    invincible, thought on the contrary due to such large backing from the economy and military. Inside the Reichstag, the members voted to give the government the money it needed. The German press had not been free to discuss the events of July 1914.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Indeed, until late summer of 1942, the Allies lost more ships in submarine attacks than they were able to build. Above all, old suspicions continued to creep into the ongoing process of negotiating and distributing lend-lease supplies. Americans who had learned during the purges to regard Stalin as "a sort

  2. How Significant A Role Did Britain Play In The War Against Germany?

    The victory was very decisive and meant that invasion by the Germans was not on the cards, Operation Sealion, (an operation to try to invade Britain by coming across the channel), was called off by Hitler. Another very important conflict was the Battle Of The Atlantic.

  1. The Battle of Britain as a turning point in the Second World War.In the ...

    This made it incredibly hard for the U-boats to successfully destroy all of the merchant ships without being destroyed of heavily damaged in the process. This however did not sop the U-boat's, as the attacks were still mainly successful. In fact in 1941, 1299 allied ships were sunk and only 87 of the German U-boats were sunk.

  2. Was the Battleof Britain a turning point in the defeat of German in World ...

    turning point in the war, is the fact that Britain's survival was vital to the Allies. Britain was used as a main base for the Allies, when Roosevelt and Churchill made the decision in 1942 to start the allied bombing campaign against the Germans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work