• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant were the obstacles to German Nationalism between 1815 and 1919?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How significant were the obstacles to German Nationalism between 1815 and 1919? Between 1815 and 1919, numerous obstacles to the advancement and establishment of German Nationalism appeared and their significance, both individual and holistically, is a major area of debate for historians. Initial obstacles to nationalism in the period were the impact of the Vienna Settlement, repressive conservative powers such as Metternich, and a general consensus against nationalism. Later obstacles that were particularly apparent during the 1848 revolutions were the divisions between nationalist groups and the paricularism of the German people. Throughout the period, an obstacle to nationalism was the loyalty to things other than the nation, these being: Catholicism, Socialism and, perhaps, Communism. It must also be noted that, to a certain extent, nationalism was an obstacle to itself, due to its 'chameleon-like' nature, The 1815 Congress of Vienna and creation of the German Confederation was initially a very strong obstacle to nationalism, but later in the period became less significant. Although it is often argued that the Treaty did lessen the number of German states from 350 to 39, and was therefore a move toward unity and German Nationalism, this is an extremely superficial interpretation. ...read more.

Middle

An obstacle to German Nationalism that was consistently active up to World War One was the loyalty of the German people to their individual states. Particularism was particularly evident in the pre-unified Germany, in which the German people did not generally consider themselves 'Germans'. For example, a Bavarian would consider themselves a 'Bavarian' and not a 'German'. This attitude was also present with the rulers of the individual German states who jealously guarded their sovereignty and blocked even modest moves toward the strengthening of common bonds. This loyalty to the state and the state's self-protection meant that nationalist feeling was difficult to cultivate. However, most German states still entered into the Zollverein at some point, thus showing that they were not totally unwilling to accept some form of political unity - though the Zollverein was by no means set up initially as a form of political unity and few states joined it during its initial stages, but it did come to represent a sort of political union between German states and those that joined it at a later date were aware of this, the states were also clearly prepared to accept economic nationalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The proximity of Germany to Russia made Communism a distinct danger, it must also be noted that the most prominent Marxists of the time, Marx and Engels, were German. However, the perpetual fear of Communism evident in Germany through the later part of the period meant that Communism was not a significant danger to German Nationalism. The obstacles to German Nationalism were much more significant in the earlier part of the period than the later one of the late 19th Century onwards. During the early 19th Century, there were numerous physical obstacles to German Nationalism, such as Metternich and the Treaty of Vienna, which were not in effect later in the period. The divisions between German Nationalists were also, to a certain extent, overridden between 1870 and 1918 - though they did emerge again after the German defeat and the Treaty of Versailles. The obstacles to nationalism that occurred in Germany after 1870 were more intangible than they had been previously, and mostly consisted of a drawing away of loyalties from the state - and not always effectively so. These obstacles were much less significant than they had previously been. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    a failure of the settlement, hence opposing the view that the failures outweighed the successes at the congress of Vienna. An overriding aim at Vienna was to establish a balance of power in Europe. Paul W Schroeder notes that 'in everything from official treaties to private letters and diaries they

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    kept Austria under control, than it did to form the North German Confederation. Indeed, if Prussia had have pressed on to Vienna, one might wonder how the German State would be structured today, for it would surely have a vastly different shape.

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    the outcome of many wars but was not widely used due to conservative militarists refusing to allow warfare to become an industrial process. Many officers believed personal courage and moral discipline was more effective than any technology could ever be.

  2. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    He made every step to crush nationalism he said to Tsar Alexander I of Russia, "It is true that I do not like democracies. Democracy is in every case a principle of dissolution, of decomposition." This demonstrates that the foreign minister of Austria, one of the most powerful positions in

  1. How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing ...

    It later included most German states but essentially, it excluded Austria, being excluded from this free trading zone meant huge economic difficulties for Austria. Prussia had achieved a position of economic leadership within the Confederation, and the Zollverein became a focal point for national feeling, mainly with the nationalist view

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    These tactics allowed Sinn Fein to gaining 73 seats, but instead of taking their places in Westminster they met in Dublin as The Dail and thanks to their huge victory in the 1918 election they could claim to represent the will of the Irish people.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The New York Herald Tribune correspondent, entering Berlin on May 3, 1945, wrote: "Nothing is left in Berlin. There are no homes, no shops, no transportation, no government buildings. Only a few walls are the heritage bequeathed by the Nazis to the people of Berlin.

  2. How Effectively Did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders Advance Their Cause 1801-1921 ?

    These attacks show a lack of coordination but although their actions were largely unorganised and on a small scale the Fenians had an important impact upon the British government and on the Irish Nationalist cause as they focused Gladstone's attention on the Irish question and provided the 'Manchester Martyrs' as inspiration for future groups such as the Easter Rebels.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work