• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant were the short-term effects of the October Revolution on Russian politics and society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How significant were the short-term effects of the October Revolution on Russian politics and society? The October Revolution was a pivotal point in creating a Soviet Russia. The Provisional Government's failures created an opportunity for the Bolshevik party to attempt a seizure of power which created a Bolshevik regime. The course of the Revolution was smooth - they did not size power; it fell into their hands. The spontaneous nature of the Revolution called for a consolidation of power immediately after leading to decisions such as reforms, the suppression of the opposition, the end of Russia's involvement in the Second World War, economic policies and the Civil War. However, there is debate on the overall significance of the October Revolution in the course of Russian politics. The success of the Revolution arguably relied predominantly on Lenin. According to Leon Trotsky, ?If neither Lenin nor I had been present, there would have been no October Revolution: the leadership of the Bolshevik Part would have prevented it from occurring.?[1] His importance was reaffirmed with his early reforms (spanning between October 1917 and February 1918) aimed to transform Russia intro a Bolshevik society quickly and effectively. Reforms such as the introduction of an 8-hour day, a system of social insurance, the abolishment of titles and class distinctions and ranks in the army, the nationalisation of the banks and schools and the confiscation of church land created societal changes, contributing the Communist promises. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in a terrible famine in 1921 which killed between an estimated 7,500,000 to 10,000,000 Russians. It also saw the introduction of the ?Red Terror? which seek to eliminate all counter-revolutionaries and the cruel treatment of the bourgeoisie. This also led to the execution of the Romanov family to finally sever all Russia's ties with Tsarism. As the Bolsheviks began to assert control, they implemented a new strategy of detaining the opposition in concentration camps and programmes of forced labour followed afterwards. J.N. Westwood argued that ?probably in 1923 the unpopularity of the government was great as two years earlier; the workers were still underpaid, underfed and unproductive, while the peasants had never forgotten their treatment under War Communism.. In both town and country there was a feeling that every Communist was a little tsar.?[8] This summaries the significance of the Civil War as relatively useless in addressing the people's demands and again, just consolidating the Bolsheviks' absolute power over Russia. However, Mawdsley seemingly disagrees, giving the treatment of the Russian people creditability as it worked: ?..the Bolsheviks readiness to use extreme methods against their enemies was an important element in their keeping control of central Russia ? at a time when their political base was small and they had little to give the people.? Wise also agreed that despite the use of terror and the terrible conditions of Russia after the ...read more.

Conclusion

After leading to an unstable society, the politics of Bolshevism were changed, moving towards brutal and capitalist policies and the Bolsheviks struggle in keeping and asserting control became the most significant impacts. Although there is controversy in how effective their techniques of controlling Russia were and ultimately whether they really were in control, the October Revolution led to a long ruling Communist regime which although troubled, withstood the opposition and perils that the Russian citizens put towards them. 1394 words ________________ [1] Leon Trotsky, The History of the Russian Revolution, 1933 [2] Lionel Kochan, The Russian Revolution, Wayland Publishers, 1971 [3] Lionel Kochan, The Russian Revolution, Wayland Publishers, 1971 [4] Dr Rick B.A. Wise, The Bolshevik Revolution, Veritas Foundation Publishing Centre, 1991 [5] Lionel Kochan, The Russian Revolution, Wayland Publishers, 1971 [6] Evan Mawdsley, The Russian Civil War, Allen and Unwin, 1987 [7] Evan Mawdsley, The Russian Civil War, Allen and Unwin, 1987 [8] J.N. Westwood, Russia 1917-1964, B. T. Batsford Ltd., 1966 [9] Rick B.A. Wise, The Bolshevik Revolution, Veritas Foundation Publishing Centre, 1991 [10] Michael Lynch, Access to History, From Autocracy to Communism: Russia 1894-1941 for OCR, Hodder Education, 2008 [11] David Evans and Jane Jenkins, Years of Russia, the USSR and the Collapse of Soviet Communism (Second Edition), Published by Hodder Education, 2008 [12] Rick B.A. Wise, The Bolshevik Revolution, Veritas Foundation Publishing Centre, 1991 [13] Helene Carreve D'Encausse, Lenin: Revolution and Power, Longman, 1982 [14] Robert V. Daniels, Red October, Secker & Warburg, 1967 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Lenin's main role in 1917 was as a leader for the Bolshevik party and those who supported them. He was an inspirational leader rather than someone who led by actions. He rallied the troops and gave the people of Russia an alternative leader, leading them to believe in a better life through his speeches directly to the people.

  2. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    Poland, together whilst keeping their interests quite separate. The Nazi-Soviet pact sought an agreement between the Soviet Union and Germany to create a treaty which contained several articles, with a summation of the treaty could well be found in the first article, "both High Contracting Parties obligate themselves to desist from any act of violence, any aggressive action,

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Even the desire for retribution against the Tsar seems to have been fairly minimal, to judge from the fact that cries for his arrest in the first days of the revolution were remarkably few and far between. Some of the demands of the workers were of the most fundamental sort.

  2. How far can the October revolution be considered a popular revolution?

    and essentially drove themselves into a dead end. There is proof from past situations of unrest, that when the people reached a critical point, where they would directly defy law and order (which was happening at the time in the form of peasants in the countryside taking land for themselves)

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    Lenin had changed the way in which Russia was run, ruled and lived in for decades to come. This was a great victory for communism and Lenin's time in power had proved that communism could work. It was also apparent that these changes could not have been brought about without him.

  2. 'Without Lenin there would have been no revolution' - David Footman, an academic British ...

    Also, after his return at Petrograd on 3 April 1917, he declared that the February Revolution, did not give Russia political freedom but had created a 'parliamentary - bourgeois republic.' He accursed the Provisional Government and called for its overthrow, he stated 'why wait for power if it could be seized now?'

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The Bolsheviks had seized power by force and used force to consolidate and maintain their position. Essentially, Stalin?s terror was a continuation of Lenin?s terror, but on a larger scale. 2. Stalin?s terror was unique in its motives and intensity, and Stalin was at the centre of events.

  2. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    However we must question his judgment and thus the reliability of this source as he would have had to be arguing for Germany to get the best possible deal or least harsh terms for Germany coming out of the negotiations Reparations as part of the Treaty of Versailles had another

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work