• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How stable was the government of England during the reign of Richard III?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How stable was the government of England during the reign of Richard III? Problems faced by Richard III- Richard of York came to power in 1483 with great controversy. After the death of Edward the IV, his heir was too young to rule, so was placed in the care of the Woodville family. The Woodvilles were not well liked and many people supported Richard's move to take the young Edward V into his care, thus making Richard regent. However the prince and his brother disappeared from public view and Richard himself was crowned king, a move that was bound to make him unpopular with many. He would have to prove himself to these people. Richard III became king during the War of the Roses, which was before his seizure of the throne, in a state of partial peace. Richard claiming the throne ruined what was left of this peace. This would cause him and his government problems later on. Richard was a Yorkist, and though the threat of the Lancastrians was small at the time of his seizure of the throne, Henry Tudor was still alive, and so a potential threat to Richard. ...read more.

Middle

Scotland was close to England, and to lose such a potential ally would be fatal, as any rebel could hope to call on James III for support should they wish to usurp the throne. Indeed, James III decided to help the campaign of Henry Tudor, which would not be considered any good for the fail stability of the government. A factor that was completely out of Richard's control was the bad harvest that struck England. Bad harvests affected everybody and he was considered responsible for this. A bad harvest meant prices rose, the economy would slump, and with Richard's train of poor luck (the death of his heir, wife, and various scandals of incest and murder) he was considered a bad omen, and the cause of such a poor crop. Having a reputation as a "wicked" man did not help him in the slightest. Many people would not ever get to see the king, so the portraits that were painted of him would be important in the way he was perceived. Perhaps the most famous portrait of him is an anonymous portrait in the National Gallery, painted circa 1500. (After his death) It shows Richard as a very sallow regal figure, with a hunchback. ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet had Richard survived and perhaps remained in power for a longer period of time the fates of the two Princes which gave him the name of a evil murderer would have slowly been forgotten, and would not have mattered as much as it was blown up to be after his death. Richard had remained loyal through the entire reign of Edward IV and had not seemed to want the throne. The turmoil that he caused by taking the throne did upset the frail peace that had begun to settle, but with time, would have settled down once more had Richard had the time to work on the problem. He had proved himself to be an effective leader, which the government would have found necessary, and had the intention to stabilise the situation, as soon as he had eradicated any threats to his reign, which he considered first priority. The major cracks that endangered the stability of his government were the issuing of jobs to his Northern supporters that would have meant Southerner's discontent, and the undeniable fact that he was not the rightful heir to the throne, and the rightful heir could not be located, due to Richard. These were cracks that would have healed in time, but would have taken a good deal of time to heal, time that Richard did not have. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why Richard III was able to usurp the throne of England in June ...

    4 star(s)

    had a very small number of men going with them there was only around 2000 men allowed to join then on the procession. By the time they left a message had been sent to Richard form Hastings stating 'get you to London' because if Richard didn't get to London it

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    To do this James prevented the Church of England from splitting into groups, which could develop their own Protestant ideas and support Laud. Puritanism became a political as well as religious movement when the parliamentary protest against Stuart depotism became entwined with the religious protest against Archbishop Laud's policy of enforced conformity.

  1. How influential was Dudley on the reign of Elizabeth 1st

    Often it seemed courtship was instigated in case England had need of military help such as the proposed match between Elizabeth and the Archduke Charles which would have satisfied Phillip the 2nd and provided a potential ally against growing French aggression in Scotland.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    that he is sincere when in fact, he is lying between his teeth. The technique that he uses involves his gentleness and perseverance in praising her beauty: 'Your beauty was the cause of that effect: / Your beauty, that did haunt me in my sleep.'

  1. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    supposed to be met by Buckingham but as the rebellion failed and Buckingham was executed he didn't even manage to land on English soil and went back to exile in Brittany. This hopeful invasion made him a known threat to Richard III which he knew he had to exterminate, he

  2. How effective was Richard III as King of England?

    It was an act of reconciliation, yet he did it on his own terms and self-advertisement. The rebellion of 1483 broke out in the South and West of England. It is not totally clear whether the rebellion was in reaction to his usurpation of the throne or because the Duke

  1. Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III?

    Finding men loyal to him rather than the House of York proved difficult and the few he found were generally men who were part of his ducal affinity built up in his brother's reign when he controlled the north. Putting these northerners in key positions in the south caused resentment among the southern nobility.

  2. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    He continued the policy of recovering lapsed feudal dues and improved the Crown's demesne through forfeiture. He was particularly vigilant in the promotion of law and order as explained previously, establishing the master of requests, John Harrington. He also established the Council of the North to fill the power vacuum he had left under his nephew, the earl of Lincoln.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work