• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HOW STABLE WAS THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE ON THE OUTBREAK OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW STABLE WAS THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE ON THE OUTBREAK OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN 1914? The Russian Revolution of 1917 was born to a large extent out of the defeats and chaos of the First World War, and many historians have argued that the Bolshevik seizure of power was mainly attributable to this factor. Certainly the war highlighted the weaknesses of the Russian economy and system of government. Nevertheless, the level of revolutionary activity in the preceding fifty years suggests that the Tsarist regime was vulnerable to political upheaval, and therefore it might be fairer to say that war determined the nature, timing and course of the revolution rather than being its main cause. Jose' The autocratic Russian government had to contend with many problems. At the heart of these problems was her backwardness economically, socially and politically. The dilemma facing her rulers from the end of the Napoleonic Wars to the outbreak of World War One was whether or not to modernize and unleash potentially dangerous forces for change, or resist change and risk falling further behind her Western European rivals. ...read more.

Middle

Not even the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 could improve the social and economic situation of the peasantry. Russian industry was still under-developed in the second half of the nineteenth century. Witte's attempts at rapid, government-inspired modernization carried with them the threat of political upheaval in so far as they created for the first time in Russian history a sizeable bourgeoisie and urban proletariat. The Russian tsars also faced the problem of a tradition of violent revolutionary activity, which arguably dated back to the Decembrist consp�racy of 1825. Alexander II had been assassinated by members of the 'Narodnaya Volya', and this reinforced the reactionary policies of his successors. Marxists, Social Revolutionaries, Nihilists, Anarchists and others were all committed at various times to the overthrow of Tsarism. It would probably also be fair to say that the policies of the Tsars actually increased and inflamed this revolutionary threat, and by 1914 the support base for the Romanov dynasty was dangerously narrow and decreasing alarmingly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Indeed, it is possible that the Tsar and his advisers hoped that the surge of patriotism accompanying the war might deflect people's attentions from the deteriorating economic situation, thus repeating the mistake of the Russo-Japanese War. Thus the Tsarist regime faced major challenges to its very existence in 1914. What eventually destroyed it, however, were the disasters and humiliating defeats of the First World War. Quite clearly the Imperial Russian Government was unable to cope with the political, social, economic and military demands of a modern war. Some historians (eg - Hugh Seton-Watson) have lamented the fact that the war prevented Russia from developing into a liberal, Western European style state. Such arguments ignore the fact that most of the Tsars preferred to resist, or at the very least delay, such political changes. Besides, it is clear that the Russian Empire was inherently backward and unstable, and peaceful, evolutionary development was unlikely. Tsarism had faced many previous challenges to its existence, and it is quite possible that it might have succumbed to another crisis even without the experience of defeat in war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    This excellent combination, along with the French army in such disarray is the cause for the significant defeat France took in this war. The outcome of the war was resolved with two main treaties, the Treaty of Paris and the Treaty of Hubertusburg, both being signed in February 1763, finally bringing the conflict to an end.

  2. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    He continues to expose Rhodes as a capitalist with his description of the greatest Rand Lord as a 'millionaire, a king of finance (and) the man who was mainly responsible for the Anglo-Boer War.' This theory argues that when a capitalist nation has reached the absolute peak of capitalism then

  1. Which of these judgements best Reflects the State of Imperial Russia in 1914? By ...

    The Socialist Revolutionary breakaway group which chose to be represented in the Duma had several peasant candidates standing for elections. These trudoviks were a sign of empowerment for the proletariat and peasants. However their role should not be overemphasised, as the majority of Russian peasants were apathetic to the kind

  2. Why Did The Whites Lose The Russian Civil War

    Reds a lot of support from the peasant population of Russia, which made 80% of Russia's overall population. This increased Lenin's fighting machine greatly. Another beneficial advantage of the Bolsheviks was the location of the capital, which had been moved from Petrograd to Moscow, a much more central position.

  1. To What Extent was World War Two the Key Turning Point in Britain's Relationship ...

    rule had shown they wanted independence, such as in India and the Dominions, and they felt it was wrong to deny such people their freedom. Both powers also had economic objections to the British Empire, as it limited their ability to trade freely throughout the world.

  2. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    This was partly because the majority of serfs had no money to spend, let alone invest, and were unable to prosper economically. Consequently, it can be seen that in 1856 serfdom was a break on economic development. This was understood by the Tsarist government, and they aimed to remove this

  1. Russo Japanese War

    There was nothing shown on this day to be violent and also it was none political meaning the response from Tsar should have been an easy one. They even carried banners which shown them to be peaceful, religious people who do love Tsar and are not against him and are

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    Nicholas had to manage Russia through a time of major social and economic change but many have suggested that this was a role he simply could not handle and he did not want to take on, but unfortunately for him, it was his job to bring Russia into the twentieth century.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work