• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HOW STABLE WAS THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE ON THE OUTBREAK OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW STABLE WAS THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE ON THE OUTBREAK OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN 1914? The Russian Revolution of 1917 was born to a large extent out of the defeats and chaos of the First World War, and many historians have argued that the Bolshevik seizure of power was mainly attributable to this factor. Certainly the war highlighted the weaknesses of the Russian economy and system of government. Nevertheless, the level of revolutionary activity in the preceding fifty years suggests that the Tsarist regime was vulnerable to political upheaval, and therefore it might be fairer to say that war determined the nature, timing and course of the revolution rather than being its main cause. Jose' The autocratic Russian government had to contend with many problems. At the heart of these problems was her backwardness economically, socially and politically. The dilemma facing her rulers from the end of the Napoleonic Wars to the outbreak of World War One was whether or not to modernize and unleash potentially dangerous forces for change, or resist change and risk falling further behind her Western European rivals. ...read more.

Middle

Not even the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 could improve the social and economic situation of the peasantry. Russian industry was still under-developed in the second half of the nineteenth century. Witte's attempts at rapid, government-inspired modernization carried with them the threat of political upheaval in so far as they created for the first time in Russian history a sizeable bourgeoisie and urban proletariat. The Russian tsars also faced the problem of a tradition of violent revolutionary activity, which arguably dated back to the Decembrist consp�racy of 1825. Alexander II had been assassinated by members of the 'Narodnaya Volya', and this reinforced the reactionary policies of his successors. Marxists, Social Revolutionaries, Nihilists, Anarchists and others were all committed at various times to the overthrow of Tsarism. It would probably also be fair to say that the policies of the Tsars actually increased and inflamed this revolutionary threat, and by 1914 the support base for the Romanov dynasty was dangerously narrow and decreasing alarmingly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Indeed, it is possible that the Tsar and his advisers hoped that the surge of patriotism accompanying the war might deflect people's attentions from the deteriorating economic situation, thus repeating the mistake of the Russo-Japanese War. Thus the Tsarist regime faced major challenges to its very existence in 1914. What eventually destroyed it, however, were the disasters and humiliating defeats of the First World War. Quite clearly the Imperial Russian Government was unable to cope with the political, social, economic and military demands of a modern war. Some historians (eg - Hugh Seton-Watson) have lamented the fact that the war prevented Russia from developing into a liberal, Western European style state. Such arguments ignore the fact that most of the Tsars preferred to resist, or at the very least delay, such political changes. Besides, it is clear that the Russian Empire was inherently backward and unstable, and peaceful, evolutionary development was unlikely. Tsarism had faced many previous challenges to its existence, and it is quite possible that it might have succumbed to another crisis even without the experience of defeat in war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was the War Measures act necessary for the October Crisis

    4 star(s)

    He was a war veteran, and was only one month away from retirement when the explosive detonated and ended his life. These attacks continued, as recently as February 13th 1969, less the two years before the October Crisis, the FLQ set of their largest and most devastating explosive, a powerful bomb that ripped through the Montreal stock exchange.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    This excellent combination, along with the French army in such disarray is the cause for the significant defeat France took in this war. The outcome of the war was resolved with two main treaties, the Treaty of Paris and the Treaty of Hubertusburg, both being signed in February 1763, finally bringing the conflict to an end.

  1. How far was the Russo-Japanese war responsible for the 1905 revolution

    Groups including alienated intelligentsia, Socialist revolutionaries , Social democrats , Liberals , Peasant socialism , Terrorist Tradition , Bolsheviks and Mensheviks and national minorities were all oppositions of the Tsar and they all possessed something in common - they wanted change.

  2. Why Did The Whites Lose The Russian Civil War

    Reds a lot of support from the peasant population of Russia, which made 80% of Russia's overall population. This increased Lenin's fighting machine greatly. Another beneficial advantage of the Bolsheviks was the location of the capital, which had been moved from Petrograd to Moscow, a much more central position.

  1. How far was the conservative government responsible for the outbreak of the General Strike ...

    Furthermore, they did not accept the wage cuts that were suggested and also they stopped any attempt to improve the mining industry as they were not looking at it from a long term perspective. Also the industrial relations in the mining industry were really poor making it strikes prone.

  2. The First English Civil War

    They had the sympathies of most of the large towns, where the trained bands, drilled once a month, provided cadres for new regiments. Further, by recognising the inevitable, they gained a start in war preparations which they never lost. The Earl of Warwick, the Earl of Essex and the Earl

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    Both the Tsarist and Soviet eras saw significant changes enacted from central government to agriculture and the peasantry, from emancipation under Alexander II to the Collective farms of Stalin and the Virgin Land Scheme under Khrushchev. The decision to emancipate the serfs was influenced largely by Alexander II himself, however 'the emancipation of the serfs had mixed effects.

  2. To What Extent was World War Two the Key Turning Point in Britain's Relationship ...

    These changes in international relations led to Britain being put under pressure to decolonise. The USSR objected to the Empire on ideological grounds, believing that Imperialist policy conflicted with their own Communist views. The USA was also anti-imperialist. They objected to the Empire because they many of those under British

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work