• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Strong Was Henry VII's Position On The Throne In 1485?

Extracts from this document...


How Strong Was Henry VII's Position On The Throne In 1485? Henry VII ascended to the throne of England after nearly one hundred years of civil war, unrest and multiple Kings of varying political skill. Much of the nobility had learned to operate outside of the monarchy, and the feudalism principles (every noble owing patronage to the sovereign) installed by William I had gone awry. The Wars of the Roses were caused by the descendents of Edward III sons; Lionel Duke of Clarence and John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. The rival factions of Lancaster and York were formed and in conjunction with various noble families, fought over who they wanted to be the King of England. Although the Wars of the Roses did not begin until 1455, the fighting started when Henry Bolingbroke, who became Henry IV, deposed Richard II in 1399. The line of King Henry IV reigned until 1461, and the line descended from John of Gaunt's first marriage became extinct in 1471 when Edward, Prince of Wales and his father Henry VI were executed by Edward IV; the first Yorkist King. Therefore, when Henry VII was born to Margaret Beaufort and Edmund Tudor, in 1457, it seemed unlikely that his vague claim to the throne would ever amount to anything. Henry's mother, Margaret Beaufort was descended from John of Gaunt's second marriage to Catherine Swynford. ...read more.


There was strong opposition to Henry by people like Margaret of Burgundy, who spoke out against Henry as a usurper with a weak claim to the throne. By the rights of primogeniture, the de la Pole brothers, who were directly descended from the second son of Edward III, had a stronger claim than Henry, who was descended from his third son. None the less, Henry did possess many advantages. He was King through right of conquest, implying that God wanted Henry to become King and so made sure he won the battle. Therefore, if God wanted Henry to be King, then the nobles had no right to try and depose him. The suspected regicide of Richard III was a positive aspect for Henry; the sons of Edward IV were believed to be dead and so could not claim the throne. Richard III's son Edward died in 1484, and with Richard's death in battle, his line had become extinct, which further strengthened Henry's claim. The house of York was marred by Richard's actions and the only other Lancastrian claimant was Jasper Tudor, Henry's uncle who swore his allegiance and remained loyal to Henry until his death in 1495. Henry's marriage to Elizabeth of York was seen by many as a move to unite the warring houses, as their children would be of Edward III's blood on both sides; if Henry could remain on the throne long enough for Elizabeth to produce an heir, then their children would have had an undisputable claim to the throne. ...read more.


Henry was establishing himself as a talented tactician by the way he handled the nobility and quickly cemented his authority throughout the country. When Henry Tudor became Henry VII in 1485, his reign was not expected to last greatly longer than a year. He united the factions of York and Lancaster within three months of his coronation by his marriage to Elizabeth of York. He inspired loyalty in the nobles who had lead the Yorkist cause, he promised peace and stability to the lower classes, and he secured his dynasty with an heir within eleven months of being crowned. There were numerous obstacles working against Henry; there were Yorkists with a claim to the throne at least as strong as his own, he was seen as a Frenchman, he had little support from English noblemen, he had no standing army and the nobility believed they could place whomever they pleased on the throne. But despite numerous reasons that should weaken his position on the throne, Henry VII managed to secure himself quickly and gain control of England and the respect and loyalty of its nobles by sheer political skill, a shrewd mind and decisive merciful action, gaining not only patronage but also respect. There may have been uprisings, pretenders and people determined to undermine Henry's control later in his reign, but he, a relative unknown, ended civil war in England and secured a dynasty lasting almost one hundred and twenty years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The Battle of Bosworth.

    This was due to the fact that there south side was protected by a marsh which. This is reported by Polydore Vergil, This shows exactly where Henry placed his army. He was on the western side of the hill giving him protection on the right flank due to the marsh

  2. Success of Henry VII in strengthening the financial position of the Crown.

    Effectiveness of policy. There were a lot of attainders e.g. Sir William Stanley had to pay�9,000 and then�1,000 p.a. for his treason in 1495. The highest passed was 51, total of 140, a third reversed. Parliamentary grants. Extraordinary revenue was money which came to the crow on particular occasions and therefore with no regularity.

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    We must bare all"; it is clear in Henry's reflection that he feels burdened by the responsibility of king. This different portrayal of Henry's character is, rather than a negative, a tribute to Henry as king as he is able to hide his uncertainties and remain strong and confident In front of his men.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    This is her role in the play and Richard presents her as a 'foul wrinkled witch.' We first see the Duchess of York in Act 2 Scene 2 and this is a scene of great emotion. The Duchess is confronting Clarence's two young children by trying to spare them by saying that their father isn't dead.

  1. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    The duke of Buckingham joined it at a later stage. Large parts of the south were rebelling for over a month, but although the rebellion was serious and threatening, it failed. This was largely due to Richard's vigilance and effective use of spies.

  2. Why did Henry VII win the Battle of Bosworth?

    Richard?s decrease in popularity meant that people who no longer supported Richard would therefore support Henry, adding yet again to Henry?s support which contributed to him winning the Battle of Bosworth. There were also short terms political reasons behind Henry?s win.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    How successful was the use of militancy? * Militancy for some anti-suffragists was proof of the wide-spread instability of women, and of fanatical and hysterical women more particularly. It was therefore proof that women should not be allowed to vote.

  2. How successful was Henry VII in securing international recognition in the years 1485 to ...

    Phillip of Burgundy was Isabella?s son-in-law as well as the husband of Princess Joanna of Castile, Phillip was summoned to Spain and well recognised as the king of Castile. Henry decided to break the Treaty of Medina Del Campo and join Phillip, this was a very good decision at the time as Philip became king.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work