• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was King Richard I in achieving his objectives in the Third Crusade?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How successful was King Richard I in achieving his objectives in the Third Crusade? Richard I?s primary objective in the Third Crusade was to recover Jerusalem following it?s recapture by Saladin in October 1187, an objective which he failed to see through. However, the Third Crusade was not a total disaster, as it allowed Richard to somewhat diminish Saladin?s prestige and to protect the remainder of Outremer. The Third Crusade was called following the loss of Jerusalem. When preaching for a new Crusade in 1189, Pope Innocent III claimed that the primary objective of the Third Crusade was to recover the holy city from the Muslims who had taken it. ...read more.

Middle

Following the unsuccessful first march to Jerusalem, Richard took his men back to Ascalon in 1192 to begin rebuilding the castle there in a four month construction program. Ascalon proved to be a formidable offensive and defensive castle, and he could have used it for his attack on Egypt. This was only a short term success, however, as Saladin forced him to abandon it in the 1193 Treaty of Jaffa. However, it was not a completely failure for Richard. In 1191, Richard I managed to secure the port of Acre and take it back from Muslims hands, which helped to expand the Crusader states, and in 1192 he also managed to get Jaffa back. ...read more.

Conclusion

The result of this was the Treaty of Jaffa, in 1193, in which Richard managed to secure the remainder of the Crusader states in return for the abandonment of Ascalon. Whilst this was successful, it was only a short term guarantee as when Saladin died in 1193, his truce died with him and the abandonment of Ascalon was also a failure as it meant that the Crusaders had wasted four months rebuilding it. Although the Third Crusade had its successes, I think that ultimately Richard I?s objectives were not met. He didn?t managed to recover Jerusalem, he didn?t get anywhere near Egypt and he lost the one castle which could have been used offensively to potentially help him in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    Despite Richard's return from the Holy Land in 1192, the Third Crusade had spawned an epilogue crusade under taken by the Holy Roman Empire under the leadership of Henry VI. Under Henry the Germans were able to take Sidon and thus restore the land connection between the kingdom of Jerusalem and the county of Tripoli.

  2. To what extent was the first crusade a success

    Fulcher of Chartres has left this out of his account, and it may be that the idea of Jerusalem was much less powerful than the holiness of the Crusade, however it has also been noted that

  1. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    handbook of the Middle Ages, and Bede's 'Ecclesiastical History of the English People'. The translation of such books meant that many more people could read the works of famous philosophers, historians etc, which resulted in the reduction in the sense of inferiority that was implied by the texts being entirely Latin.

  2. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    The debate on the treatment of Dyer shows that some British people opposed Dyer. Montague was one of them, and he criticized Dyer for his racism which had violated the 'principles upon which our Indian empire had been built21. Churchill declared to the House of Commons that the Massacre was

  1. The mystery of Stonehenge- theories about its construction and usage.

    Each weighted as much as 50 tons. They probably were transported from near the Avebury stone rings twenty miles to the north. Between 1500 and 1100 BC sixty of the bluestones were placed in a circle immediately inside the first circle, and another nineteen were placed in a horseshoe pattern, also inside the circle.

  2. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    The first reaction to the passing of the Act of Union was Robert Emmet's unsuccessful rising of 1803, where he was soon easily captured, tried and executed. Without Emmet, and namely his highly rhetorical epitaph proclaiming that no man should write his epitaph until Ireland "takes her place among the

  1. What Did Charlemagne Do While In Power As King?

    in 775 but was only brought to a conclusion in 804 with the definitive conquest and Christianisation of Saxony as an integral part of Charlemagne's realm. In addition, Charlemagne campaigned against the Moors in Muslim Spain, in order to subject them to Christian rule, in 778; in Benevento, in southern

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    But this was not the only disunity, within the Seljuk Empire there were rival emirs and conflicts between states for example Kilij Arslan the Seljuk Sultan of Rum was warring with the Danishmenz when the Crusaders landed in the middle east.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work