• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was King Richard I in achieving his objectives in the Third Crusade?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How successful was King Richard I in achieving his objectives in the Third Crusade? Richard I?s primary objective in the Third Crusade was to recover Jerusalem following it?s recapture by Saladin in October 1187, an objective which he failed to see through. However, the Third Crusade was not a total disaster, as it allowed Richard to somewhat diminish Saladin?s prestige and to protect the remainder of Outremer. The Third Crusade was called following the loss of Jerusalem. When preaching for a new Crusade in 1189, Pope Innocent III claimed that the primary objective of the Third Crusade was to recover the holy city from the Muslims who had taken it. ...read more.


Following the unsuccessful first march to Jerusalem, Richard took his men back to Ascalon in 1192 to begin rebuilding the castle there in a four month construction program. Ascalon proved to be a formidable offensive and defensive castle, and he could have used it for his attack on Egypt. This was only a short term success, however, as Saladin forced him to abandon it in the 1193 Treaty of Jaffa. However, it was not a completely failure for Richard. In 1191, Richard I managed to secure the port of Acre and take it back from Muslims hands, which helped to expand the Crusader states, and in 1192 he also managed to get Jaffa back. ...read more.


The result of this was the Treaty of Jaffa, in 1193, in which Richard managed to secure the remainder of the Crusader states in return for the abandonment of Ascalon. Whilst this was successful, it was only a short term guarantee as when Saladin died in 1193, his truce died with him and the abandonment of Ascalon was also a failure as it meant that the Crusaders had wasted four months rebuilding it. Although the Third Crusade had its successes, I think that ultimately Richard I?s objectives were not met. He didn?t managed to recover Jerusalem, he didn?t get anywhere near Egypt and he lost the one castle which could have been used offensively to potentially help him in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    to "pacify Ireland" which contributed to the passing of the Gladstone's Land Bill 1870 and the Act disestablishing the Protestant Church over the whole of Ireland became law in 1869. In September 1870 the Home Government Association was founded, later to be replaced by the Home Rule League with the

  2. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    Despite Richard's return from the Holy Land in 1192, the Third Crusade had spawned an epilogue crusade under taken by the Holy Roman Empire under the leadership of Henry VI. Under Henry the Germans were able to take Sidon and thus restore the land connection between the kingdom of Jerusalem and the county of Tripoli.

  1. To what extent was the first crusade a success

    Urban had hoped that by giving the Franks a common enemy, he might cut down on the number of Christians fighting Christians and to most eyes this was a resounding success. One of the main themes of the accounts of the Sermon at Clermont is the idea of Jerusalem, admittedly

  2. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    handbook of the Middle Ages, and Bede's 'Ecclesiastical History of the English People'. The translation of such books meant that many more people could read the works of famous philosophers, historians etc, which resulted in the reduction in the sense of inferiority that was implied by the texts being entirely Latin.

  1. What Did Charlemagne Do While In Power As King?

    Capitularies from the early 800s prescribe a system of military levying and organization apparently of some sophistication and capable of raising large armies. It is possible, however, that this organization, in so far as it was new, was a response to external threats from both hostile Vikings and Slavs from Eastern Europe, rather than the basis of Charlemagne's conquests.

  2. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    only son to school at Harrow and university at Cambridge, manifested his disrespect for the British by discarding dresses, ties, boas and homburgs into a bonfire11. Chaudhuri said, "Even I felt like rest of my countrymen (angry)", further commenting that the Dyer affair was the "worst exhibition of the spurious and arrogant imperial sentiment"12.

  1. The mystery of Stonehenge- theories about its construction and usage.

    It certainly required great power and vast amounts of manual labor. It's important to say that everything was done before the wheel was invented. Over the years, various authors have suggested that supernatural or anachronistic methods were used, usually asserting that the stones were impossible to move otherwise.

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    their aid, of course this stories are untrue, but the fact that the crusaders believed that they saw these things shows how powerful, and dangerous, this belief could be. furthermore the Crusaders became so fanactical they believe they were the 'instruments of the last judgement' and went out of control

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work