• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Louis XVIII as the King of France?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How successful was Louis XVIII as the King of France? In April 1814, Napoleon abdicated from the throne unconditionally due to other European monarchs rising against him. This meant the question erupts to who was going to rule France. This decision fell on the shoulders of the quadruple alliance (Britain, Russia, Austria, Prussia), who then decided to restore the Bourbon Dynasty that had ruled in 1793. The rightful Bourbon heir was Louis XVIII, brother of King Louis XVI. To decide if King Louis XVIII was a successful monarch, success must first be defined. I would define a successful monarch as one for which puts the interests of their country first, not necessarily pleasing everybody all the time, but assuring the countries? stability in the best way possible. When Louis first arrived on the throne he had a series of problems he needed to overcome, for which some were more difficult than others, yet he managed these issues with ease. Surely this is a sign of a successful king, but how successful was he exactly? One of the more apparent problems was that of unpopularity of the Bourbon name. For 20 years the Bourbon name had been in disgrace, after the execution by guillotine of King Louis XVI on 21st January 1793. Even just the mention of the name would bring disgust to Frenchmen?s faces. ...read more.


All these issues needed to dealt with smoothly and efficiently. Louis had various options available to him; it was merely a matter of selecting the correct procedures, many of which had an impact on multiple issues. It would have been far easier for Louis to choose to side with his extreme ultra royalist supporters who had won a large majority at the elections held for the Chamber. They used this opportunity and power to take revenge and execute some Bonapartist Generals, known as the ?White Terror?. This amongst other things, this caused a Bonapartist uprising at Grenoble in May 1816. At this point realised this had potential of causing a national uprising. The king was far more moderate than the ultra royalists as he realised France could not return back to the ?Ancien Regime?. He therefore decided to dissolve the chamber in the hope that a more moderate group would get in. This was a crucially intelligent move, as in the next election the more moderate Royalist Constitutionalists won the majority. This helped the reestablishment of the Bourbon name as the majority of France supported this decision. At this time, the organisation of the French finances was beginning to take shape on a sound basis due to the expertise of Baron Louis and Count Corvetto. ...read more.


In a book written by Philip Marsell about the king, stated ?Louis XVIII, not Louis XIII, as is often said, was the last king of France for whom his people mourned?. The statement alone clarifies just how Louis had managed to win over the respect of the country, from practically being a detested outsider to becoming a beloved King. The book also comments how ?the throne had never been more secure?. This shows just how the King and the decisions he made had changed what could only be classified as a country of political instability to one for which there was no question who should rule the country in the future. At the beginning of this essay I defined a successful king as ?as one for which puts the interests of their country first, not necessarily pleasing everybody all the time, but assuring the countries? stability in the best way possible.? This is very true of King Louis XVIII. He could never please both the liberals and the Ultras, yet he made decisions that allowed France to recover from the Napoleonic wars and gain the structure and stability that had been lacking in the previous 20 years. Not only did his actions improve the country financially and politically, he became a King for which the country was proud to have and sad to see go, despite the history of the Bourbon Dynasty. Katie Tiltman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    of the Versailles Settlement,'37 due to the notion of self determination advocated by Woodrow Wilson. Hardy wrote in the Dynasts that in the settlement he had in mind 'peoples and provinces' would not be 'bandied about like pawns in a game,'38 indicating that the Vienna Congress was perhaps no more

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    The Urban renewal scheme was popular amongst the upper middle classes and the rich but was incredibly unpopular amongst the poor as the project was only one street deep which meant that the slums still remained and the previous houses of the poor were torn down in order to make these new houses.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Napoleon knew this from his own experience - as commander of the Army of Italy and then the Army of Egypt he had frequently made his own decisions and he had acted without reference to anyone. * His new arrangements were based on the ideas of Guibert, whose thinking

  2. To what extent and why did the impact of Napoleonic rule vary outside France?

    Paris needed to be consulted over every move satellite states made and Napoleon personally oversaw the majority of decisions however petty. It could take weeks for a request to be approved and placed into action at the outer reaches of the Empire which severely reduced the level of efficiency when implementing many of Napoleon's wishes.

  1. How successful was Louis of imposing absolute control on government in the provinces?

    Louis could do anything without the consultation of others. He could control France in his own way if he wanted to as he made the final decisions over anything which was to be passed by government or even the clergy.

  2. The shortcomings of Louis XVI

    The Enlightenment can be seen to have been the trigger of the French revolution as it showed people that they did not just have to agree with everything that Louis said and put forward. The enlightenment began to take effect in the 1780s as the number of people taking up careers in the church declined.

  1. How successful was the National Assembly bringing equality and liberty to France during 1789-93?

    and privileges they had lost, but even so the deputies were thrilled with the outcome and Duquesnoy even said ?What a nation! What glory. What honour to the French!? which showed how confident they were with the August Decrees. The second significant paper reform was the Deceleration of the Rights

  2. To what extent does the polarization of politics in France by 1824 demonstrate that ...

    The Liberals were the moderates against the royalists. The ultras hope to return to the structure of the Ancien regime, wanting to end the charter of 1814 , which aimed to create a largely constitutional monarchy. Ostensibly granted by a sovereign King, this document promised an elected two-chamber legislature to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work