• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalins economic policy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's economic policy? Through the NEP (new economic policy) Lenin had helped the Soviet Union recovery from its seven years of warfare (1914-21), but by 1927 the industry had not developed as much as was necessary, and Stalin sought to change this. "We are 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us!" Josef Stalin, speech to the Fourth Plenum of Industrial Managers, Feb. 4, 1931. This speech epitomises what Stalin wanted for the economy of the USSR, he believed that Soviet Russia had to become modernised extremely quickly, in order to satisfy a number of issues. During the 1930s, Stalin had become convinced that Russia would be attacked, and he knew that a country that had been properly modernised and industrialised was weak, and could not succeed in winning a war, let alone spreading communism throughout the world. Russia had to achieve self-sufficiency, to establish them as an independent world power; they would have to rid themselves of their dependence on Western countries for manufactured goods. ...read more.

Middle

The Soviet leadership was confident that the replacement of individual peasant farms would immediately increase the food supply for urban populations, the supply of raw materials for processing industry, and agricultural exports. Collectivization was thus regarded as the solution to the crisis of agricultural distribution (mainly in grain deliveries) that had developed since 1927. This problem became more acute as the Soviet Union pressed ahead with its ambitious industrialization program. The implementation of the first five year plan, or The Great Turn as it is often known, was hugely significant as it marked the major shift in were the USSR was headed, it took a huge step towards industrialisation and mobilisation, but some historians also mark this as the point where the Soviet Union took a step towards totalitarianism, tyranny and inhumanity. In mid-1929, less than 5% of peasants were on collective or state farms, but in January 1930, Stalin announced that around 25% of the grain-producing areas were to be collectivised with the coming year. This news was greeted with some surprise; many thought that this would have been a voluntarily process, taking place at a much slower rate. ...read more.

Conclusion

The increased need for mass production caused wealthy businessmen to start pulling strings so that their particular project did not suffer, this resulted in certain industries overproducing, and others under producing. But managers and officers were too afraid to admit anything was wrong as they didn't want to be accused as being an enemy of the plan. In conclusion, although some sectors showed marked improvement, because much investment had to be contributed to the collectivisation programme, many targets were not met, the first five year plan although not meeting its targets, proved to kick start the Soviet economy. The second five year plan changed the emphasis slightly, the over optimistic targets were scaled back and more detail was put into each section of the industry, so that the increases in production could be consolidated. This organisation through emphasis on consumer goods and improvements to the railways and the increase in training programmes resulted in 1934-36 being known economically as 'good years'. The third five year plan continued were the last left off, heavy industry continued to grow and the emphasis on armaments increased rapidly, although the plan only lasted 3 and a half years as the second world war intervened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    The purge of Communist society lasted for four years between 1934 and 1938, during this period millions of Russians were arrested, sent to labour camps or shot. Main features of the purges were extremely public show trials where old Bolsheviks, who could have possibly opposed Stalin, were forced to confess to several crimes against the state.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    What was meant by the 'Right Opposition' 2. What were they accused of? 3. Why was Bakharan seen as a threat to Stalin? 1. Right Opposition - Those party members who had wanted to keep the NEP and criticised Stalin's rapid industrialisation under the five-year plans as harsh and, in economic terms, necessary.

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    were often at the front of demonstrations and the picture of women lying down in front of the tractors was not an uncommon site. The widespread resistance became perceived by Stalin and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU)

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    In addition to the funding it received, increased production in heavy industry was achieved by improving efficiency in existing factories, as well as developing new industrial plants. The plans focused not only on developing traditional industrial centres, such as Moscow, the site of the new Metro, and Leningrad, but also

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    they met targets even if this was untrue; this led to the system showing that it was working where in fact this was not the case. The scapegoat for these shortcomings was the 'bourgeois specialists'. They were accused of deliberately holding up supply and causing breakdowns.

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Despite this there is clear evidence that one of the big influences on Stalin's choice to collectivise was the way in which it would allow a more efficient requisitioning process, consequently injecting more food into the urban areas of Russia, which would help the USSR towards the ideological aim of creating a Communist workers utopia.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The USSR needed to focus on developing heavy industry before a socialist society could emerge. Stalin?s defeat of the Left and Right Opposition and establishment of personal rule between 1924 and 1929: The defeat of the left: By the late 1920s, Stalin was well on the way to achieving power.

  2. How Far Were Economic Problems Responsible for Stalin's Decision to replace the New Economic ...

    fund the industry side of the 5 Year Plans, this would not be achievable under NEP. However there were other reasons for turning from the NEP. Stalin had recently won the struggle for power and needed to cement his success.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work