• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalins economic policy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's economic policy? Through the NEP (new economic policy) Lenin had helped the Soviet Union recovery from its seven years of warfare (1914-21), but by 1927 the industry had not developed as much as was necessary, and Stalin sought to change this. "We are 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us!" Josef Stalin, speech to the Fourth Plenum of Industrial Managers, Feb. 4, 1931. This speech epitomises what Stalin wanted for the economy of the USSR, he believed that Soviet Russia had to become modernised extremely quickly, in order to satisfy a number of issues. During the 1930s, Stalin had become convinced that Russia would be attacked, and he knew that a country that had been properly modernised and industrialised was weak, and could not succeed in winning a war, let alone spreading communism throughout the world. Russia had to achieve self-sufficiency, to establish them as an independent world power; they would have to rid themselves of their dependence on Western countries for manufactured goods. ...read more.

Middle

The Soviet leadership was confident that the replacement of individual peasant farms would immediately increase the food supply for urban populations, the supply of raw materials for processing industry, and agricultural exports. Collectivization was thus regarded as the solution to the crisis of agricultural distribution (mainly in grain deliveries) that had developed since 1927. This problem became more acute as the Soviet Union pressed ahead with its ambitious industrialization program. The implementation of the first five year plan, or The Great Turn as it is often known, was hugely significant as it marked the major shift in were the USSR was headed, it took a huge step towards industrialisation and mobilisation, but some historians also mark this as the point where the Soviet Union took a step towards totalitarianism, tyranny and inhumanity. In mid-1929, less than 5% of peasants were on collective or state farms, but in January 1930, Stalin announced that around 25% of the grain-producing areas were to be collectivised with the coming year. This news was greeted with some surprise; many thought that this would have been a voluntarily process, taking place at a much slower rate. ...read more.

Conclusion

The increased need for mass production caused wealthy businessmen to start pulling strings so that their particular project did not suffer, this resulted in certain industries overproducing, and others under producing. But managers and officers were too afraid to admit anything was wrong as they didn't want to be accused as being an enemy of the plan. In conclusion, although some sectors showed marked improvement, because much investment had to be contributed to the collectivisation programme, many targets were not met, the first five year plan although not meeting its targets, proved to kick start the Soviet economy. The second five year plan changed the emphasis slightly, the over optimistic targets were scaled back and more detail was put into each section of the industry, so that the increases in production could be consolidated. This organisation through emphasis on consumer goods and improvements to the railways and the increase in training programmes resulted in 1934-36 being known economically as 'good years'. The third five year plan continued were the last left off, heavy industry continued to grow and the emphasis on armaments increased rapidly, although the plan only lasted 3 and a half years as the second world war intervened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    made new industrial centres of less developed parts of the country, for example Kazakhstan and Georgia. These industrial centres, started under the first Five-Year Plan, greatly helped the success of the second plan, as by that time, the centres were completed and in production.

  2. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    Also due to the population increasing from 147 million to 170 million is a large factor to the rapid modernisation resulting from the extra labour available. The best explanation of the success of the five year plans I feel comes from Evans "If the success of the five year plans

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    "Collectivisation of the rural economy, however, had technocratic as well as ideological reasons."19 This can be supported by an increase in exports from 0.3 million tonnes of grain in 1928 to 5.1 million tonnes in 1931. Yet this source does not address the fact the technocratic pursuits were most likely just ways of consolidating power.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    By 1932 62% had been collectivised - rising to 93% in 1937. The effect of collectivisation was substantial. 1930 the MIR was abolished and replaced by the Kolkhoz administration members of the Communist Young Pioneers organisation used wooden watchtowers to spy on the peasants in the fields to ensure they did not steal food to feed their own families.

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    farms to a series of collective farms where land, equipment and workers were pooled together for the greater good of Communism. Taken at face value, the bulk of grain produced did indeed increase rapidly, but at great expense to the Russian people.

  2. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    In this way, it was argued, they would be in a position to afford the latest machinery. Stalin believed this policy would lead to increased production. However, the peasants greatly preferred farming their 'own' land and were reluctant to form themselves into state collectives.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    but who were strongly opposed to totalitarianism regimes like the one Stalin ran. 3. Some historians argue that Trotsky would have been a far more liberal leader than Stalin. 4. Others argue that Trotsky helped Stalin to become a bloody dictator, in the way that he facilitated Stalin?s seizure of power in the Party.

  2. How Far Were Economic Problems Responsible for Stalin's Decision to replace the New Economic ...

    Collectivisation would also free up many peasants to leave the rural areas of Russia and work in the factories of the cities, this was incredibly important for the success of modernising Russia. An increase of grain production was also necessary for cash crops ? Stalin needed to sell grain to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work