• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalins economic policy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's economic policy? Through the NEP (new economic policy) Lenin had helped the Soviet Union recovery from its seven years of warfare (1914-21), but by 1927 the industry had not developed as much as was necessary, and Stalin sought to change this. "We are 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us!" Josef Stalin, speech to the Fourth Plenum of Industrial Managers, Feb. 4, 1931. This speech epitomises what Stalin wanted for the economy of the USSR, he believed that Soviet Russia had to become modernised extremely quickly, in order to satisfy a number of issues. During the 1930s, Stalin had become convinced that Russia would be attacked, and he knew that a country that had been properly modernised and industrialised was weak, and could not succeed in winning a war, let alone spreading communism throughout the world. Russia had to achieve self-sufficiency, to establish them as an independent world power; they would have to rid themselves of their dependence on Western countries for manufactured goods. ...read more.

Middle

The Soviet leadership was confident that the replacement of individual peasant farms would immediately increase the food supply for urban populations, the supply of raw materials for processing industry, and agricultural exports. Collectivization was thus regarded as the solution to the crisis of agricultural distribution (mainly in grain deliveries) that had developed since 1927. This problem became more acute as the Soviet Union pressed ahead with its ambitious industrialization program. The implementation of the first five year plan, or The Great Turn as it is often known, was hugely significant as it marked the major shift in were the USSR was headed, it took a huge step towards industrialisation and mobilisation, but some historians also mark this as the point where the Soviet Union took a step towards totalitarianism, tyranny and inhumanity. In mid-1929, less than 5% of peasants were on collective or state farms, but in January 1930, Stalin announced that around 25% of the grain-producing areas were to be collectivised with the coming year. This news was greeted with some surprise; many thought that this would have been a voluntarily process, taking place at a much slower rate. ...read more.

Conclusion

The increased need for mass production caused wealthy businessmen to start pulling strings so that their particular project did not suffer, this resulted in certain industries overproducing, and others under producing. But managers and officers were too afraid to admit anything was wrong as they didn't want to be accused as being an enemy of the plan. In conclusion, although some sectors showed marked improvement, because much investment had to be contributed to the collectivisation programme, many targets were not met, the first five year plan although not meeting its targets, proved to kick start the Soviet economy. The second five year plan changed the emphasis slightly, the over optimistic targets were scaled back and more detail was put into each section of the industry, so that the increases in production could be consolidated. This organisation through emphasis on consumer goods and improvements to the railways and the increase in training programmes resulted in 1934-36 being known economically as 'good years'. The third five year plan continued were the last left off, heavy industry continued to grow and the emphasis on armaments increased rapidly, although the plan only lasted 3 and a half years as the second world war intervened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    The peasants had suffered all ready due their resistance and having vested interests. But worse was to come. The peasants were unable to work- some wouldn't and others couldn't. Leading to many peasants eating their own seed corns and slaughtering their livestock.

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    In addition to the funding it received, increased production in heavy industry was achieved by improving efficiency in existing factories, as well as developing new industrial plants. The plans focused not only on developing traditional industrial centres, such as Moscow, the site of the new Metro, and Leningrad, but also

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    they met targets even if this was untrue; this led to the system showing that it was working where in fact this was not the case. The scapegoat for these shortcomings was the 'bourgeois specialists'. They were accused of deliberately holding up supply and causing breakdowns.

  2. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Although the results of the first plan did not meet the targets set by the Communist Party, the increase was dramatic. Perhaps the targets had been set unrealistically high, but the industrial area had leapt up in sheer amount of production.

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    In context Deutscher's view, was still dependent on a very small source of information, most of which was reminiscent of the 1930's and very 'pro-Stalin'. Therefore the quote is still of limited use due to its lack of analytical scope.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    This fact would help to reduce the fact of a counter revolution, and would also help the fledgling regime to gain international recognition. Dual power, as a concept was, from the start compromised by the entry of Kerensky, a Truvodnik leader in to the Provisional government.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Stalin began to publicise his policy of Socialism in One Country ? the USSR should concentrate on developing its path to socialism meaning that it would not be vulnerable against attacks by Capitalist states. 4. Trotsky attacked Stalin?s ideas and joined Kamenev and Zinoviev in the United/Left Opposition.

  2. How Far Were Economic Problems Responsible for Stalin's Decision to replace the New Economic ...

    During the struggle for power he had ruled NEP as uncommunist that had allowed him to expel Tomsky, Rykov and Bukharin from the party; to live up to this declaration he needed to introduce a new policy. At this point the global eye was on Russia, western countries like America and Britain were incredibly sceptical of communism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work