• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the Labour Government (1945-51) in dealing with Beveridge's "five giants on the road to social progress"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was the Labour Government (1945-51) in dealing with Beveridge's "five giants on the road to social progress"? The 1942 Beveridge report was created by William Beveridge in order to help the Government outline the main problems in Britain. He was only meant to deal with the giant of want but he claimed that it was only one of the five giants being (want, disease, ignorance, squalor and idleness). It was this report which Labour committed themselves to during the 1945 general election. Their undoubtedly greatest success was creating the National Health Service (NHS). This meant that people who normally couldn't afford to go to see doctors could see a doctor when they needed them. This was created by Aneurin Bevan; a Welsh coal miner who had risen through the trade unions. This National Health Service helped to create jobs and social discontent. This was very hard to implement as Britain was on the verges of bankruptcy and hadn't got the loan they were hoping to from the Americans. He also desperately needed to get the doctors to join the scheme but they were at first reluctant due to worse pay and they also didn't want to work for the government. ...read more.

Middle

A major difference between this welfare state and the one which had passed before it was that the Labour one had no means test; the Labour welfare state was successful as people paid in they would get back when they were older and need it. There was also a national assistance act which dealt with people who didn't meet the criteria for the national insurance act i.e. they were beyond the working age so they couldn't pay in and therefore wouldn't get anything out. This scheme was means tested. There was also a national insurance of industrial injuries act. This helped people who had been injured at work and could claim compensation from the employer. They also brought in family allowance although this had already been designed by the coalition during the war. This gave families of 2 children or more benefits to help bring them up. This was successful as it gave a good sense of social security and helped the two main genres of people who suffer from poverty: the old and large families. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was a poor decision as it is hard to decide a child's academic ability at 11 and it especially didn't help the late developers. Also very few technology schools were ever made so most people went to secondary moderns anyway. They did make some good decisions however by raising the school leaving age to 15 but they were meant to up it to 16 as soon as possible but it took much longer for this to happen which is a major fault on their part. With the great economic problems and also the destruction after the war Labour did an absolutely astounding job in dealing with the problems that were left after the war. Also the Beveridge report represented an ideal world and to create that idyllic world would take much longer than 6 years and what Labour did in their 6 years gave either themselves or other governments after them a brilliant start from which they could finish the job off. Without the thoughts of economic problems and war damage it doesn't look like they did very well but with all factors considered they did a very good job and were very successful in creating the welfare state. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matthew Fisher 12B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    only major labour reform that the Conservatives dared to take a firm stance against. In 1951 Labour attained 48.8% of the vote, and the Conservatives only got 48% of the vote. Yet, despite this they won 26 more seats than Labour, this seems somewhat disproportionate and illogical and can once again be traced back to the first-past-the-post system.

  2. How successful was the Labour Government from 1945- 1951?

    schools to create equality amongst children and throughout education, yet Labour did not put any pressure on to the private schools and universities but instead allowed them to flourish. The NHS also cost much more than Bevan and Atlee had imagined, with growing economic debt to the U.S.

  1. Labour and the Five Giants

    However, Labour were solely responsible for just one of these. The Family Allowance Act was introduced by the coalition government in 1944 and passed by Labour in 1945. It provided for a weekly allowance of 5 shillings, which was paid to the wife and financed out of general taxation.

  2. How successfully did the Labour government of 1945-1951 deal with the social problems identified ...

    He felt that the people of Britain should be given security in times of need. This included when they were unemployed, sick, old, injured at work, pregnant or widowed. He felt that financial support should be given to the vulnerable sectors of society who, through no fault of their own, could not work and therefore were unable to earn money.

  1. The Successes of Labour from 1945

    Another limitation was that there was no unified system of NHS administration. Although hospitals were now funded centrally, there were significant regional variations in the pattern of healthcare. Another limitation was the shortage of trained staff and of buildings, the main problem being the scarcity of dentists, with only 10,000 to cater for 47 million people.

  2. how successful was the labour govt 1945 - 51?

    Nationalisation improved conditions for workers and showed how the future would be under Labour. Coal was detrimental to Britain's economy, and the speed in which Labour brought it under public ownership shows Labours commitment. It also reduced unemployment and so decreased the amount of benefits needed.

  1. How successful were the National Governments in dealing with the problems of the 1930s?

    economic relationship which appeased the business community and thus boosted business confidence. However, an economic recovery in Britain was not simply formed due to these 2 policies. The formation of the National Government alone boosted confidence into the British economy but also the government?s ability to manage the economy as

  2. How successful were the Labour Government reforms of 1945-51 in improving social and economic ...

    promise to make the pound sterling fully convertible to the US dollar in 1947, the loans meant the government had money in which to buy essential imports. However the extent of success is limited, as the loans ran out years before it was supposed to due to the bad winter of 1946-47 causing a huge fuel crisis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work