• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s The statement which I agree most with is: "the League's successes in the 1920s were small-scale, its failures had a higher profile."

Extracts from this document...


How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s The statement which I agree most with is: "the League's successes in the 1920s were small-scale, its failures had a higher profile." It was composed of several permanent members France, Great Britain, Italy and Japan. The first blow to the League of Nations was that America, who was the most important country and the only country who had the power to make it work, did not join. That meant Britain and France had to lead, the flaw was that both of them were weakened by the First World War and both of them had their own agenda. ...read more.


In the area of preserving peace, the league's successes were minimal. When Lithuania appealed for help as Poland took control of its capital Vilna, the league did nothing at all. It failed its first crucial case. In the Corfu crisis in 1923, an Italian general Tellini and his team were ambushed and killed while they were surveying the Greek side of the frontier area. Mussolini blamed the Greek government for this; he then bombarded and occupied the Greek island of Corfu. The League condemned Mussolini's action. But he worked on the Conference of Ambassador to make Greek apologise and pay compensation directly to Italy. This showed just how powerless the League was with big problems and showed people how easily people like Mussolini could get their own ways. ...read more.


So the League of Nations could only be effective against small countries with less important problems. The work of the agencies of the League was in many ways the most successful part of the whole operation. These include aiding refugees and freeing slaves, improving health and labour conditions, producing an international highway code for road users, raiding against slave owners and traders, and recording information on drug trafficking, prostitution and slavery. Much of what the League did in the areas was to last over a long period of time and help a considerable number of people, which the league may be credited with certain social achievements. On the whole, although the League succeeded in some areas, it was powerless to prevent event that had led to the Second World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    The policies simply failed to transform lives, the common man was not really affected by the two battles in any way, and small businesses still found it very difficult to progress, due to the land tax. As well as this, there was no real improvement in the quality of life

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    By blocking the Suez Canal and the Straits of Gibraltar, Britain would have forced Italy to withdraw from Abyssinia. The only problem with that would have been that Britain would have been putting Anglo-American relations on a bad footing - America needing to export as much as possible to ease the effects of economic collapse.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    This is supported by Gould Francis Leckie 'the numerous states of Germany and Italy are liable to be over-run, plundered in every political squall.'10 This indicated a fundamental failure of the settlement, and therefore the view that the failures outweighed the successes certainly contains some truth.

  2. Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations ...

    In the early days of the league it had much support and backing. Everyone wanted peace after the many years of fighting. The league had one major power; trade sanctions. This frightened many countries but it was not a successful as first interpreted.

  1. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    This increased fears in the middle and upper classes of revolution and increased the fears of socialists that the power war government would not listen to the demands of the workers, as they had been so brutally crushed. The Munich Revolution, also in 1919, was successful for the communists who took control of Bavaria, declaring it the Bavarian Soviet Republic.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    However, the sanctions were not placed upon the essentials for war, iron, coal and oil because Britain and France were worried about provoking Mussolini any more than they had to.

  1. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    In Germany the collapse of the Weimar Republic, unemployment and poverty led people to elect the Nazis, whom made no secret of their plans to overturn the Treaty of Versailles, France worried about the changing situation in Germany began to build border defences, in Japan the depression threatened a complete

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s?

    All loans and arms sales to Italy were banned. All imports and exports were also banned. However, most members of the League were worried about whether to stop oil sales to Italy. They feared that America would not support the sanctions, which would mean that any sanctions placed on Italy by the League would be ineffectual.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work