• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s The statement which I agree most with is: "the League's successes in the 1920s were small-scale, its failures had a higher profile."

Extracts from this document...


How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s The statement which I agree most with is: "the League's successes in the 1920s were small-scale, its failures had a higher profile." It was composed of several permanent members France, Great Britain, Italy and Japan. The first blow to the League of Nations was that America, who was the most important country and the only country who had the power to make it work, did not join. That meant Britain and France had to lead, the flaw was that both of them were weakened by the First World War and both of them had their own agenda. ...read more.


In the area of preserving peace, the league's successes were minimal. When Lithuania appealed for help as Poland took control of its capital Vilna, the league did nothing at all. It failed its first crucial case. In the Corfu crisis in 1923, an Italian general Tellini and his team were ambushed and killed while they were surveying the Greek side of the frontier area. Mussolini blamed the Greek government for this; he then bombarded and occupied the Greek island of Corfu. The League condemned Mussolini's action. But he worked on the Conference of Ambassador to make Greek apologise and pay compensation directly to Italy. This showed just how powerless the League was with big problems and showed people how easily people like Mussolini could get their own ways. ...read more.


So the League of Nations could only be effective against small countries with less important problems. The work of the agencies of the League was in many ways the most successful part of the whole operation. These include aiding refugees and freeing slaves, improving health and labour conditions, producing an international highway code for road users, raiding against slave owners and traders, and recording information on drug trafficking, prostitution and slavery. Much of what the League did in the areas was to last over a long period of time and help a considerable number of people, which the league may be credited with certain social achievements. On the whole, although the League succeeded in some areas, it was powerless to prevent event that had led to the Second World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    of the majority of the population; strikes were abolished, there as no minimum wage, and unemployment was still at 1 million in 1933. Industrialists and landlords did benefit from the policy of protectionism, but this is a small minority of the population; once more Mussolini has failed to influence the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Britain and France had not made the decision to stop Mussolini because they were trying desperately to keep him on their side against Hitler. Sending troops into Abyssinia would not have helped their cause. Thus the League had been shown to be a failure.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    John Lowe argues that 'it was here that the peacemakers most clearly revealed their limited vision, missing the opportunity to satisfy aspirations for good government and some form of national identity.'11 However, the view can also be undermined as although Germany was not united, it was less divided than the

  2. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    The Weimar Government faced an association with the war defeat; the humiliation of the Treaty of Versailles and the reparations. This hindered the Weimar government right from the start, as many Germans considered the signing of the Treaty of Versailles treason.

  1. The main attraction was its opposition to Communism. How far do you agree with ...

    The shift in mass democracy meant that the Liberals were now a minority in the Chamber of Deputies. The PSI had a revolutionary agenda in 1919 and would not cooperate with the Liberals. Therefore, the Liberals had to become dependent on the PPI.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    The ILO basically was set up in order to set a certain standard for the treatment of workers. It was mainly designed to improve the working conditions for workers. Two other involved the Refugee commission and the World Health Organization (WHO).

  1. Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations ...

    It helped refugees and in its first few years returned over 400,000 prisoners of war to there home lands. I think that these targets were extremely optimistic; this is because the war had just ended. However I believe that these targets were more long term targets than short term ones.

  2. What were the principal successes and failures of the revolutions in Italy 1820-31?

    This included prison sentences, torture and numerous executions. After the interference of Austria, Naples returned to order and the revolution had failed. This was again the case in Sicily, as control returned there also. This constant conciliation was arguably one of the more important factors in the breakdown of these revolutions however there were other contributing factors as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work