• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29? Wolsey's rise to power was for many reasons: his low social background drove him to succeed; his force of personality; his natural intelligence - the boy bachelor; his oratory skills and his understanding of the King. Wolsey was blessed with these gifts and with the trust of the King Wolsey had the potential to be great. Wolsey was in the position to do this, so why is his success in domestic administration such a debated matter? I feel his success depends on how and what we are judging his achievements on. There was much pressure for reform within the church during Wolsey's time in power. Bishops and Archbishops were criticised of nepotism, meaning uneducated and undeserving men were throughout the clergy. Priests were immoral, breaking their oath to celibacy and in some cases with their own daughter. The papacy was in turmoil and it was disrespected. Anticlericalism was becoming prevalent and Christian humanists were pushing for reform. They were trying to educate, translating the bible into different languages so people could read it and they were challenging Catholic ideas, like the pope's behaviour and the role of the priest. With this pressure for reform Wolsey could have become a great figure in the Church and create successful reformer, but he did not take this opportunity even though historians such as Guy believed Wolsey was an opportunist and thrived off opportunities. ...read more.

Middle

The courtiers were soon back in Henry's court and Wolsey proposed that the courtiers should be used as ambassadors for England going off to France and other countries on diplomatic missions. This again removed them from the court for periods of time and Wolsey had the trust of the King. Wolsey needed money for Henry's attack on France but there was no money, so he created the amicable grant to gain money. But this backfired and Wolsey was vulnerable, so Wolsey through up another smokescreen of reform. The Eltham ordinances in 1526 reduced the amount of courtiers in the privy chamber from 12 - 6 and he could replace his rivals in the chamber. He removed the current 'groom of the stool' - William Compton and put in the politically neutral Henry Norris. This was done in the name of economy and ultimately covered up the failure of the amicable grant with his smokescreen of reform. His reforms were for personal interest and hardly ever benefited England. Wolsey's administration of Government was actually quite successful, he kept considerable control over the courtiers and although the reforms were not beneficial to the country they were a success for him personally as he stayed in power longer and still had the trust of Henry and the influence over Henry. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although he failed to reform enclosures as he struggled to focus on his campaign due to more important pressure from other areas in domestic administration. Many of Wolsey's reforms were geared towards personal interest and not towards gain for England. Wolsey is self glorifying and was interested in taking care of himself; he wanted to stay in power as long as he could and he undermined people and used false reforms to stay there. On the other hand Wolsey has been treated harshly by history as he was only trying to stay in power and he did. I feel Wolsey, as chief minister to Henry VIII had a hard job, he had to put up with a warlike and very lavish King and as Cardinal and papal legate in a failing and challenged Religion did well to stay in power so long, and I feel this was his main aim. He did not achieve much in domestic administration and did not improve England as a country during his time in power, but he did stay in power for twenty years, which is a very long time. Wolsey may not have judged his success on how much he achieved but on how long he could stay at the top. Wolsey proposed much and delivered little, but was he concerned about this? Stephen Kyle a ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The author has considerable knowledge of Wolsey's reforms and uses a good amount of detail throughout. Paragraphs could start with clearer judgments to maintain the analytical focus and direct quotations could be used, although historians are referred to well. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Guy praises the way Elizabeth dealt with this, saying; 'Elizabeth could always outflank political moves by wielding familiar weapons: expressing her displeasure, or commanding that no more bills for religion be read in Parliament ...'

  2. How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half ...

    Therefore the reform was an improvement and therefore a success. In 1861, the abolition of the patriarchal authority of the gentry required that a new local government system was to be implemented. It was named the zemstva.

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    Economically the Labour government of 45-51 struggled, with the electorate all too aware of he post-war shortages, the continuing rationing, increased taxes, and the general dislike of austerity - the feeling of being "under the thumb" of the Americans. These problems, however, would have been inherent to any government of

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    After initial concern, resulting laws and fines and an attempt to reinstate Catholic equality, James' attitude to Catholicism remained undogmatic; he was prepared to accept it as a mother church but acknowledged its corruption. Unhappiness towards Catholics was made apparent in parliament, MP's complained about papists in high places, the

  1. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    This religious conflict left Charles with no choice but to reintroduce Parliament, marking the Bishop's Wars as an important precursor to the Civil War. The religious tension documented above also spread to Ireland, however the threat was in reverse here.

  2. TO WHAT EXTENT WAS HENRY VI'S INCOMPETENCE THE PRIMARY CAUSE FOR THE OUTBREAK OF ...

    Such careless mistakes increased noble feuds and put greater pressure on his council who had to correct his errors. Henry's incompetence due to his personality was a great cause of the Wars of the Roses and must be considered as a factor of the other sources of the Wars.

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    ?It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below?[4]. This statement could be seen to be merely a persuasive technique employed by Alexander, and a way of getting the nobility to support him, perhaps a way of

  2. How successful was the Labour Government (1945-51) in dealing with Beveridge's "five giants on ...

    They were producing over 200,000 but they need at least 3 times that amount to be doing anything. It got so bad that the government were allowing people to squat in derelict houses; this was the first time which a British government had made squatting legal ever.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work