• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29? Wolsey's rise to power was for many reasons: his low social background drove him to succeed; his force of personality; his natural intelligence - the boy bachelor; his oratory skills and his understanding of the King. Wolsey was blessed with these gifts and with the trust of the King Wolsey had the potential to be great. Wolsey was in the position to do this, so why is his success in domestic administration such a debated matter? I feel his success depends on how and what we are judging his achievements on. There was much pressure for reform within the church during Wolsey's time in power. Bishops and Archbishops were criticised of nepotism, meaning uneducated and undeserving men were throughout the clergy. Priests were immoral, breaking their oath to celibacy and in some cases with their own daughter. The papacy was in turmoil and it was disrespected. Anticlericalism was becoming prevalent and Christian humanists were pushing for reform. They were trying to educate, translating the bible into different languages so people could read it and they were challenging Catholic ideas, like the pope's behaviour and the role of the priest. With this pressure for reform Wolsey could have become a great figure in the Church and create successful reformer, but he did not take this opportunity even though historians such as Guy believed Wolsey was an opportunist and thrived off opportunities. ...read more.

Middle

The courtiers were soon back in Henry's court and Wolsey proposed that the courtiers should be used as ambassadors for England going off to France and other countries on diplomatic missions. This again removed them from the court for periods of time and Wolsey had the trust of the King. Wolsey needed money for Henry's attack on France but there was no money, so he created the amicable grant to gain money. But this backfired and Wolsey was vulnerable, so Wolsey through up another smokescreen of reform. The Eltham ordinances in 1526 reduced the amount of courtiers in the privy chamber from 12 - 6 and he could replace his rivals in the chamber. He removed the current 'groom of the stool' - William Compton and put in the politically neutral Henry Norris. This was done in the name of economy and ultimately covered up the failure of the amicable grant with his smokescreen of reform. His reforms were for personal interest and hardly ever benefited England. Wolsey's administration of Government was actually quite successful, he kept considerable control over the courtiers and although the reforms were not beneficial to the country they were a success for him personally as he stayed in power longer and still had the trust of Henry and the influence over Henry. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although he failed to reform enclosures as he struggled to focus on his campaign due to more important pressure from other areas in domestic administration. Many of Wolsey's reforms were geared towards personal interest and not towards gain for England. Wolsey is self glorifying and was interested in taking care of himself; he wanted to stay in power as long as he could and he undermined people and used false reforms to stay there. On the other hand Wolsey has been treated harshly by history as he was only trying to stay in power and he did. I feel Wolsey, as chief minister to Henry VIII had a hard job, he had to put up with a warlike and very lavish King and as Cardinal and papal legate in a failing and challenged Religion did well to stay in power so long, and I feel this was his main aim. He did not achieve much in domestic administration and did not improve England as a country during his time in power, but he did stay in power for twenty years, which is a very long time. Wolsey may not have judged his success on how much he achieved but on how long he could stay at the top. Wolsey proposed much and delivered little, but was he concerned about this? Stephen Kyle a ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The author has considerable knowledge of Wolsey's reforms and uses a good amount of detail throughout. Paragraphs could start with clearer judgments to maintain the analytical focus and direct quotations could be used, although historians are referred to well. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    With the support of the Pope the Catholics in England would not plot to overthrow her which would greatly ease the religious problems she faced. A final option would be to ally instead with a German Protestant Power, for example if she married a German Protestant prince.

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    In 1618, James' foreign policy interfered with the religious struggle in England. In order to create safety and allegiance for the future, James tried to marry Charles off to the Spanish Infanta. In pursuing this goal his policy towards Catholics at home softened.

  1. Why was there a revolution in France in 1789

    France got involved with the American War of independence because they believed that the benefits would out weigh the problems caused. France sought revenge on England; they also believed that America would be a good trading post, which would help revive the 'depressed' economy.

  2. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Henry changed from the exchequer system to the chamber in his reign. He needed this to make his government more effective, as it possessed some distinct advantages from the older exchequer system. The main advantage seen by Henry was that it would allow him to lay his hands on ready

  1. To What Extent Was Henry Vll Secure?

    was Perkin Warbeck and was persuaded by the Yorkist party to persuade Richard, Duke of York, the younger brother of Edward V. His claim was more serious as he had backing from some big names including Maximillian I, James IV of Scotland and Margaret of Burgundy.

  2. how significant was the catholic threat to elizabeth 1, posed by her roman catholic ...

    Due to their unwillingness to compromise, willingness to martyrdom and their foreign support, the Jesuits can be considered a significant threat to Elizabeth although there were few of them the minorities still needed to be watched. Overall singularly the Catholic groups did not pose significant threat to Elizabeth, but working

  1. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    There were 2 provinces in England, Canterbury and York. Throughout history, relations between the English monarchy and the papacy in Rome had been sporadic and errant. There had been many arguments over past monarchs? desires to control the church (which was Roman Catholic, same as the pope), which had ended in such incidents like the excommunication of Archbishop Anselm or the gruesome murder of Archbishop Beckett.

  2. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    Although debateable, one could also say that Pitt?s ability to maintain economic stability helped him stop revolution. Pitt implemented various schemes to boost the economy before and during the revolution to try and keep the economy intact. Higher taxes (Items such as horses, wig powder, windows and hair powder were taxed)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work