• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Wolsey's domestic administration of England 1515-1529?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Wolsey's domestic administration of England 1515-1529? Wolsey was born in Ipswich in 1472 to a working class family. He was a talented scholar who progressed from being the Rector of Limington in 1500 to being Henry VIII's highest advisor by 1514. Giustininani, the Venetian ambassador at the time, talks of Wolsey's "vast ability". Qwyn also says Wolsey, "combined both enormous ability and unstoppable determination." He progressed to Lord Chancellor, ruling the state and Legate, ruling the church enabling him to make many new policies. These included judicial and church policies, as well as social policies and finance. Wolsey felt that wrongdoing had to be punished wherever it was to be found, no matter who committed the crime. This meant that Wolsey's judicial policies affected both the rich and poor alike. This made Wolsey many enemies in high places due to his prosecution of nobles. An example of this is the prosecution of Sir William Bulmer for illegal retaining or Sir Robert Sheffield being fined �5330 for opprobrious words. Wolsey also got rid of Henry's closed friends, the minions as he felt they had more influence on Henry than he did. Wolsey replaced the minions with his own men but these reforms were abandoned, as Henry got bored of Wolsey's men. His attitude to nobles can also be seen in the execution of the Duke of Buckingham in 1521. ...read more.

Middle

These loans bought in about �350,000 but they caused resentment, as Henry himself did not go to war with France. In 1523 more money was needed for the expedition to France. Wolsey went to parliament and demand a subsidy of four shillings the pound, which would have given him �800,000. After a stormy and prolonged session, parliament granted two shillings in the pound spread out over a number of years. Edward Hall said that in the commons there was " a marvellous obstinate silence" Elton and Gwyn oppose each on whether Wolsey was successful or not. Elton claims it was not a successful plea to parliament, as he doesn't get al the money he desires. Gywn thinks it was "a model for all future Tudor acts" as it taxed 90% of households and Wolsey negotiated well considering he had already asked for a subsidy in 1522. In 1525 Wolsey tried to impose another levy called 'the Amicable Grant' to supplement the revenue by an arbitrary forced loan for all men with goods and property. Elton claims the collectors were far too busy collecting the 1522 and 1523 subsidies to collect a new levy. Also, Elton says there was, "no prospect of loan-money being repaid." The amicable Grant was supposed to help war with France and to exploit Pavia by raising �500,000 from the laity alone. ...read more.

Conclusion

Members of an infected were made to carrying a white stick when outside as a side to others to stay away. Economically he tried to organise the country after a bad harvest in 1518 to fix the price of poultry, and investigate the lack of other meats in London. In order to clear up the streets he purged vagabonds, criminals and prostitutes in 1519. Wolsey also licensed beggars and sent the sick on the street to hospitals. Between 1515 and 1529 Cardinal Wolsey had vast responsibilities in the English court. He was chief advisor to the king and basically had the last word below the king on finance, religion and law. It appears that Wolsey had strengths and weaknesses. Elton claims that foreign affairs and the judicial system came first with Wolsey and church reform and finance were definitely last. Wolsey was successful with short-term domestic issues, such as social and economic problems but less successful with long term problems like church and finance. By closing down a few monasteries and distancing the church from Rome he weakened the church. This made it less able to stand up to the problems it would later face, after his fall. Wolsey also did not have much success with money, he was not very thrifty and ambitious foreign policies always left the treasury low. Elton sums it up writing, " He tried to do the work of ten men, and not surprisingly failed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This essay has its strength in the knowledge and understanding of the policies of Wolsey, and there is a good range and depth to the examples given. The essay lacks sustained analysis and some time loses sight of the issue. If the argument had been set up clearly at the beginning this would have helped to structure the whole essay. ***

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    level of power when advising the King as they did under previous kings such as Richard III and Edward IV. This also gives evidence against the historians (I know not of specific ones) who believed Henry VII wished to oust the nobility completely from central government as many noblemen were

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Somerset agrees that 'although the underground puritan network had sinister implications for the Royal supremacy, very few of its members shared the revolutionary convictions of John Field'. Between 1584 and 1586 Field attempted to carry out a nationwide survey to establish grievances against Bishops and identify Puritans in England, hoping that Parliament would be influenced by it.

  1. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    In addition, Elizabeth also faced other problems which she had no way of solving, such as who her family was. Her mother, Anny Boleyn, was executed for witchcraft and adultery. This would have affected how people first perceived Elizabeth once she came into power.

  2. How Successful was the Period of Personal Rule Between 1629-1637?

    to the Privy Council outlining decisions that had been made and justifying them by reference to the Books of Orders. This ensured that Charles' wishes were being carried out effectively. Not only did Charles manage to enforce order in local government, but also in the royal court.

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    As a result, his income rose substantially. In 1487 he obtained less than �300 from this source, but by 1494 receipts were running at over �1,500 and by 1507 they had soared to more than �6,000 a year. Again, this suggests that Henry's finances were very well managed, so contributing to an effective government.

  2. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    of the Star Chamber were felt particularly keenly by parliament because they were closely connected to trade and the gentry and the heavy taxes hit them hard. There was a rebellion by a man named John Hampden who refused outright to pay the King's Ship tax.

  1. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    The issue in Pilgrimage of Grace was of no difference from Kett?s and Oxfordshire. The rebels rioted over illegal enclosures against the nobility. For instance, Yorkshire and Cumberland pulled down hedges to attack the lands of the Earl of Cumberland who enclosed his tenants? lands and denied them grazing rights.

  2. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    which created the much-needed money to wage a war against France after 1793. The introduction of the Sinking Fund (which meant that the government always had a fund of money to meet any emergency payments which needed to be paid in the future, which also helped reduce the national debt by around £10 million)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work