• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Peels social and economic reforms between 1841 and 1846?

Extracts from this document...


How successful were Peel?s social and economic reforms between 1841 and 1846? Peel?s reforms and creation of new policies during the years 1841 to 1846 had varying effects on the government and country. As historian Norman Gash argues, through the reforms that he had carried out during his spell in power Peel aimed to ?turn the Tory party of one particular class into the Conservative party of the nation?. Peel wanted to make the Conservative party less dogmatic, and his aim was to evolve policy to embrace the new industrial society and gain the support of the middle-classes, a section of society whose backing was extremely important for the future of any government and it is through the various reforms and changes made between 1841 and 1846 that Peel set about to further liberalise the Tory party. Although I believe that on the whole the that policies Peel had made were indeed successful and beneficial to the people of Britain, such as the Factory and Mines Act, there were certain aspects of Peel?s reforms which questioned just how successful Peel had been in the creation of his new reforms, hinting at the fact that he could have gotten ?lucky?- Britain had already been moving in the direction of free trade, or that, as Eric Evans claims, more could have been done to fully suit the needs of society at the time. Peel, an efficient and competent, if not slightly reserved, character believed in the theory of executive government and saw the support of his backbenchers as unnecessary. With these traits, he sought to create many policies to change the face of the Tory party at the time. ...read more.


What is also important to mention here is that the spirit of the times limited his room for manoeuvre, and Peel had an ideology that encouraged self-reliance and not self-dependence, which is displayed in his renewal of the Poor Law in 1842. Peel?s job was to create the conditions, and not interfere with people?s lives and ?spoon feed? them. He therefore did what he had to do in terms of social policy and placed his faith in the power of the market and his economic reforms to further strengthen social conditions and create prosperity of wealth in England- something which is often misunderstood when interpreting Peel?s political philosophies. The fact that there was a massive outflow of grief upon his death shows the impacts of social policy Peel had created- although not ?massive?, something like this and never really been undertaken before- to do what Peel had done in those times was fairly remarkable. Steadman Jones reinforces this view- that Peel and his government did not project the typical ?nasty state? that past governments had made a name for themselves for, but instead offered a variety of policies which showed that the government really did care. The way in which Peel dealt with Ireland is also telling of how successful his policies had been. Daniel O?Connell posed a direct challenge to Peel by setting up the Repeal Association, aiming to repeal the Act of Union of 1800. Peel had been put in a tough position; he had to quash the Irish nationalist rebellion but at the same time had to win over the general opinion of the Irish people, especially that of the Catholics. ...read more.


Peel had been determined to change the face of the Conservative party by introducing more liberal measures, such as the Factory and Mines Act, and although they didn?t go the ?full way? in totally improving social conditions, they were the first ?groundbreaking? types of reforms that had been seen before. By ignoring the majority of his cabinet and trying his best to break away from the protectionism that pervaded the Tory party, his economic reforms not only provided the government with more money, turning the past deficit into a surplus, but also helped reduced unemployment and increase trade through the lowering of tariffs and income tax. His decision to go against his protectionist, ?old-value? cabinet was also very wise, although one could argue that he greatly mismanaged his party through passing acts that had little backing, perhaps it was necessary for Pitt to take full control in order to ?break free? from protectionism and implement the new face of the Tory party that he had been trying to generate. Peel focused on continuity. He placed an emphasis on acts lasting, as evidenced by the banking framework changes, and managed to lay down the solid foundations for the future. In the eyes of the working class, he had at least ?done something- in the mood of the public times he seemed to have managed to connect with the public, and had had an ?overall vision? that sought to improve Britain socially and economically. In the end, perhaps it is the fact that monuments struck, bells rang, and statues had been built in the honour of Peel?s death, which epitomises the successes he had during his tenure. Thomas Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    4 star(s)

    and people could gain easier access to job vacancies being made through the Labour Exchange. On the other hand, the Act also had a number of disadvantages; not all trades were insured (only seasonal trades), benefits were limited to just 15 weeks of the year and the family of the unemployed worker received no benefits.

  2. Peer reviewed

    How successful were the economic and social reforms of the Peel ministry in the ...

    4 star(s)

    using troops) in an attempt to stop it, and even after this violence, there was still a third petition in 1848, showing Peel's ineffectiveness. Furthermore, the repeal of the Corn Law does not put an end to the Irish Famine, as there was no foreign food to import, perhaps showing

  1. How Important was the Anti Corn-Law League in Peel's decision to repeal the Corn ...

    The Corn Laws meant that the price of bread was relatively high, as it taxed the staple ingredient, wheat. As bread was a key part of the diet of the time, the factory owners had to pay higher wages

  2. The British reforms to change India failed because the British would sometimes use force ...

    In 1918 Sir Edwin-Montague and Viceroy Chelmsford suggested ways of reforming the Government of India. These reforms were known as the Montague-Chelmsford Report. In the report it stated that India was not ready for Home Rule which annoyed many Indians after they had supported the war effort and hoped to receive home rule.

  1. Assess the success of Peel

    Peel saw that the removal of tariffs would counter act these problems and bring down the cost of British goods abroad, increase exports, revive industry and provide more jobs as well as lowering the costs of living for the working classes.

  2. How far was Sir Robert Peel personally responsible for the recovery of the Conservative ...

    bringing back support in from the Canningite's and lower classes who felt that this new Conservative government was not the reform refusing Party led by Wellington, and the Upper Classes who felt that there was no risk of revolution.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    Causing the various different groups to split and reform. How problematic where the disputes and divisions to the cause of female suffrage? * Arguably there was a basic unity of purpose within the movement. Many suffragists aimed to avoid public disagreement and this was likely the reasoning behind the decision

  2. How successful were the Labour Government reforms of 1945-51 in improving social and economic ...

    Britain was helped by America?s very generous Marshall Aid in 1948, however this was not due to any of Labour?s reforms and was based around the red scare in America, so cannot be considered a success of Labour. However, the government?s drive for exports proved a great economic success, especially once British industry had re-adjusted to peacetime production.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work