• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

Extracts from this document...


How successful were Stalin's economic policies? Stalin's economic policies were successful to an extent, especially when looking at the increases in production of heavy industry. However they also failed in several important areas such as agriculture, meaning the overall success was limited. Also, when evaluated in terms of the effects on the people of the Soviet Union, the policies had, in many cases, a disastrous effect. Stalin's aim with his pre-war economic policies was to achieve rapid industrialisation of the Soviet Union, in order to protect it against the threat of war, which he believed to be always present. This belief had been heightened in 1928, after a war scare, making the need to industrialise seem even more urgent. Stalin believed that: "We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we shall be crushed." This shows that to Stalin, industrialising quickly was just as important as industrialisation itself. Because of this, he set high targets for the Five-Year Plans, encouraging workers to significantly increase their productivity, in order to achieve his ambitious plans. ...read more.


There was also an enormous human cost. An estimated fifteen million Kulaks, though some Historians place the figure even higher, were eliminated through Stalin's process of dekulakisation, which aimed to get rid of those 'rich' peasants thought to have benefited from the NEP. In addition to this a further four million peasants were estimated to have died after a famine in 1933 in the Ukraine, an event which was firmly denied by the Soviet government. They have since been accused of deliberately ignoring the famine in order Agricultural output did begin to recover in the late 1930s, due to the more widespread use of agricultural machinery but productivity remained low and agricultural targets consistently failed to be met. It took decades for Soviet agriculture to meet its pre-collectivisation production figures. The threat of war once again meant that arms production took priority and the development of agricultural machinery became less important, contributing to the continued low achievements of collectivisation. The labour and living conditions of the citizens of the Soviet Union were also affected by Stalin's economic policies. For those that worked hard and showed a commitment to the plans by consistently achieving their targets, they were rewarded with higher wages and improved living conditions, for example larger apartments. ...read more.


Overall, Stalin's economic policies had limited success. Industrial output increased and by the time of the Second World War, the Soviet Union had been transformed from a backward agricultural country to a modern industrial nation, on its way to becoming a leading economic power. However, Stalin believed in achieving these results whatever the cost and this meant that the policies failed to take in to account the Soviet citizens who experienced a decline in their living and working conditions. When looking at the direct results of Stalin's policies the biggest failure was the agricultural decline and the resulting famine. Despite the policy of collectivisation, agricultural output simply could not keep up with industrial output and without food to feed the workers, the policies of Stalin in regards to industrialisation would always be limited in what they could achieve. In addition to this, the long term result of the purges and the thousands of deaths they caused, can be seen as one of the most disastrous consequences of Stalin's economic policies and, in my opinion, cannot be justified no matter what the improvements made by industry. ?? ?? ?? ?? Hannah Evans ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    Germany had accrued a massive foreign currency deficit during the Great Depression, which continued into the early years of the Third Reich. The economic priorities were set by a series of measures. Bilateral trade treaties, The Reichsmark currency and mefo bills.

  2. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    in 1927, Trotsky was expelled from Russia for opposing Stalin's policy of 'socialism in one country.'13 As Stalin became more comfortable with his new power, he began to oppose many of Lenin's ideas and solutions to Russia's problems. After poor grain harvests in 1927 and 1929, Stalin felt a need to put an end to Lenin's New Economic Policy (NEP)

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    In that year, the Grand Armee was still strong enough to defeat all who stood in its way, Austrians, Prussians, or Russians. * It had, however, lost many of its experienced and disciplined troops and, although new recruits were available to fill the gaps, they went into battle untrained and often unreliable.

  2. How successful were Mussolini's economic policies?

    It was intended to try and reduce the balance of trade deficit, to free Italy "from the slavery of foreign bread," to make Italy less dependant on imports when war came, and finally to show the rest of the world that Italy was a major power.

  1. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    villages and left to starve, and people who were disobedient to this law faced severe penalties, such as being forced to work in a Gulag (a forced labour camp) (Ellman 2007 p668). There was also a food crisis in the urban areas, where the amount of food available per head

  2. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    But, on the other hand, life was very harsh under Stalin. Factory discipline was strict and punishments were severe. Lateness or absences were punished by sacking, and that often meant losing your flat or house as well.

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    There was little food, great unemployment, low wages and state violence. Industry was nationalised and the workplace became likened to militarised factories - 'worse than a tsarist prison camp' where workers were imprisoned or shot if production targets were not reached.26 The Bolshevik state coerced the unions, using them as instruments to keep the workers under control.

  2. To what extent were the Stalinist purges simply a way of eliminating his rivals?

    which [the Bolsheviks] had picked up in the long and obscure inner Party struggles in which he had tried to operate as a conciliator."4 If this is indeed true, then Trotsky would not appear to be the conspirator that Stalin preferred to describe him as.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work