• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful were Stalin's economic policies? Stalin's economic policies were successful to an extent, especially when looking at the increases in production of heavy industry. However they also failed in several important areas such as agriculture, meaning the overall success was limited. Also, when evaluated in terms of the effects on the people of the Soviet Union, the policies had, in many cases, a disastrous effect. Stalin's aim with his pre-war economic policies was to achieve rapid industrialisation of the Soviet Union, in order to protect it against the threat of war, which he believed to be always present. This belief had been heightened in 1928, after a war scare, making the need to industrialise seem even more urgent. Stalin believed that: "We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we shall be crushed." This shows that to Stalin, industrialising quickly was just as important as industrialisation itself. Because of this, he set high targets for the Five-Year Plans, encouraging workers to significantly increase their productivity, in order to achieve his ambitious plans. ...read more.

Middle

There was also an enormous human cost. An estimated fifteen million Kulaks, though some Historians place the figure even higher, were eliminated through Stalin's process of dekulakisation, which aimed to get rid of those 'rich' peasants thought to have benefited from the NEP. In addition to this a further four million peasants were estimated to have died after a famine in 1933 in the Ukraine, an event which was firmly denied by the Soviet government. They have since been accused of deliberately ignoring the famine in order Agricultural output did begin to recover in the late 1930s, due to the more widespread use of agricultural machinery but productivity remained low and agricultural targets consistently failed to be met. It took decades for Soviet agriculture to meet its pre-collectivisation production figures. The threat of war once again meant that arms production took priority and the development of agricultural machinery became less important, contributing to the continued low achievements of collectivisation. The labour and living conditions of the citizens of the Soviet Union were also affected by Stalin's economic policies. For those that worked hard and showed a commitment to the plans by consistently achieving their targets, they were rewarded with higher wages and improved living conditions, for example larger apartments. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, Stalin's economic policies had limited success. Industrial output increased and by the time of the Second World War, the Soviet Union had been transformed from a backward agricultural country to a modern industrial nation, on its way to becoming a leading economic power. However, Stalin believed in achieving these results whatever the cost and this meant that the policies failed to take in to account the Soviet citizens who experienced a decline in their living and working conditions. When looking at the direct results of Stalin's policies the biggest failure was the agricultural decline and the resulting famine. Despite the policy of collectivisation, agricultural output simply could not keep up with industrial output and without food to feed the workers, the policies of Stalin in regards to industrialisation would always be limited in what they could achieve. In addition to this, the long term result of the purges and the thousands of deaths they caused, can be seen as one of the most disastrous consequences of Stalin's economic policies and, in my opinion, cannot be justified no matter what the improvements made by industry. ?? ?? ?? ?? Hannah Evans ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    in 1927, Trotsky was expelled from Russia for opposing Stalin's policy of 'socialism in one country.'13 As Stalin became more comfortable with his new power, he began to oppose many of Lenin's ideas and solutions to Russia's problems. After poor grain harvests in 1927 and 1929, Stalin felt a need to put an end to Lenin's New Economic Policy (NEP)

  2. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    Due to the policies reliance on rapid industrialisation there were major cultural changes that had to occur simultaneously. An example of this was in Turkmenistan, where collectivisation caused a shift in the production of crops to cotton (Edgar 2004 p296).This change caused a great uproar in the region that had

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    He regrouped, south of Moscow, to protect rich farmlands there. 6. On 14 September, Napoleon entered Moscow. His troops looted the city while the Russian governor set fire to it. With supplies being constantly attacked by Cossacks, Napoleon decided to retreat - it was either that or starve.

  2. Lenin and his Achievements.

    Again I do not completely agree with this quote. This is because Lenin did bring temporary peace by coming out of World War I, but then there was a civil war in Russia. During this civil war again there was no peace. He did bring some prosperity to the people with his NEP policy, but all throughout the civil war the people were starving and living in horrible conditions.

  1. How successful were Mussolini's economic policies?

    It undermined smaller firms, which were taken over by larger ones, it made the government impose a 20% cut in wages, and the government was forced to devalue the Lira. "The Battle for Grain" occurred in order to boost the cereal production to make Italy self-sufficient in grain.

  2. To what extent were the Stalinist purges simply a way of eliminating his rivals?

    However, unlike Trotsky, Kirov was notably handsome, charming and "an outstanding example of the type of individual around whom dissatisfied Party members might rally." � Unfortunately for Kirov, his ascension to success within the Party, chiefly his election as a secretary at the XVIIth Party congress in 1934, came at

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    We must make good this gap in ten years. Either we do it or they crush us..."[15] As a result of these ideas, Stalin with the help of his government created a five-year economic plan that involved the collectivization of agriculture and the rapid industrialization of the country.[16] The plan was quite successful in modernizing the Russian economy and

  2. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    modern state and it was this that saved it from defeat when Hitler invaded in 1941. The Five-Year Plans were used very effectively for propaganda purposes. Stalin had wanted the Soviet Union to be a beacon of socialism ans his ppublicity machine used the successes of industrialisation to further that objective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work