• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the finance ministers of the period of transforming Russia economically? (1855-1904)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How successful were the finance ministers of the period of transforming Russia economically? (1855-1904) The transformation of the Russian economy had begun in the reign of Alexander II in response to the humiliation in the defeat in the Crimean war of 1854-56. This led to a development of a railway-building programme and a limited spread of factories. However, still, by 1881, Russia?s economic development still lacked far behind that of Western Europe and there was a huge gulf between Russia?s potential, given its vast supply of natural resource?s and manpower. . I am going to be looking at the works of Ivan Vyshnegradsky 1887 - 1892 and Sergei Witte 1892 - 1904 and focus on how successful these men were in transforming Russia?s economy. It wasn?t until the reign of Alexander III a real ?industrial revolution? took off, and its developments owned much to Vyshnegradsky and Witte. Ivan Vyshnegradsky was born on the 1st January 1832 in St. ...read more.


The government failed to organize adequate relief and it was left to volunteer groups to help the destitute peasant?s, this led to Vyshnegradsky?s dismissal in 1892. So even though, the economy at first was on the up, it was to the expense of the peasants? and this policy caused many unease and deaths within the period that could have possibly been avoided. This led to the employment as Sergei Witte in 1892. He was committed to modernization at to reserve Russia original ?Great Power? status. Without an entrepreneurial class, Witte believed that industrialization needed to be directed ?from above? (state capitalism). Also, he felt that Vyshnegradsky?s policies essentially were correct, and that economic development would lead to improved living standards and this in turn would reduce revolutionary activity and unrest. For economic growth to be achieved, 3 key problems needed to be solved and to continue the policy of protective tariffs, heavy taxation and forced export to generate capital. ...read more.


The railways stimulated the development of iron and coal industries and encouraged the founding of new industrial areas along their lengths; transport costs fell bringing down the prices of goods. However, other forms of transport developed but slowly with less investment. River and sea navigation improved with more steam ships but most of the overseas trade was carried in foreign ships, the roads still remained poor. However, it promised more than it delivered, and parts of the railway were still incomplete in 1914. The Trans ? Siberian railway proved a huge drain on finances, in fact under Witte the state budget was doubled, eating the the profits of economic growth. Also, Witte was too dependent of foreign loans and investments, which had to be paid back with interest. In conclusion, Vyshnegradsky had little impact on transforming Russia economically; even some improvements were made, it could be argued that his region was a drastic failure as it resulted in the deaths of hundreds and thousands of people due to famine. Wittes achievement?s were significant even with the limitations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    In 1929 a 30,000 strong army led a campaign against the peasantry to take grain, collectivise farming and destroy the kulaks, defined as party policy under Stalin in 1930. Even though the peasantry had been violently repressed under the Tsars, there was nothing remotely close to Stalin's determined campaign against the peasantry.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The usual figure given in 7,000,000, but this has been revised upwards in recent years as mass graves have been discovered in Kolyma. The true figure may ne as high as 20,000,000. * The most high profile cases were the Old Bolsheviks who were accused at the Show Trials.

  1. How successful was Alexander II in transforming Russian Society

    Wider reading meant greater education, whilst the emancipation meant that a greater number needed to be educated. The zemstva allowed these educational changes to be funded. Alexander Golovnin was appointed the Minister of Education in 1962, and under him, for the next 15 years education was transformed.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    In short a re-introduction of the police state. This led to a strengthening of revolutionary groups such as "The People's Will". This was a terrorist organisation which resorted to acts of violence to get rid of the government. They assassinated many government officials, some government ministers and eventually Alexander II himself but they failed to bring about a revolution.

  1. Was Russia more or less stable by 1881?

    Alexander II understood that serfdom prevent Russia's development such as economic growth or military re-organisation and that tsardom was in danger since the peasantry had great revolutionary potential when they are lacking their freedom, he realised that serfdom was the main factor in the backwardness and needed to be abolished as soon as possible.

  2. Stalinism and the transformation of Russia.

    Unprepared to blame his poor implementation of collectivisation, Stalin instead blamed the failure of his ideology on the existence of anti-revolutionary peasants, these were the Kulaks and richer peasants. An estimated seven million people died due to famine from 1930-33.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work