• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years to 1941?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years to 1941? By Gabriella Pink Stalin made three five-year plans spanning from 1928 to 1941. He had very different aims for each of the plans and had some very optimistic targets for the achievements of these plans. An over riding theme of each of the plans was industry. Stalin wanted to restore Russia?s hold on industry and make it a great trading power once again. The five year plans were very successful in helping building up the Russian industry. They did this through many ways, each contributing in a different manner. The production of raw materials increased dramatically thought eh five-year plans and industry on a whole became a lot more efficient. This can be seen through statistics that show the production in tonnes. Such materials as; coal, iron and steel, all rose in production quite dramatically. Iron rose from 4.2 million tonnes to 6.2 million tonnes, coal from 29.1 million tonnes to 64.3 million tonnes and steel from 4.0 million tonnes to 5.9 million tonnes. These were huge increases at that time. For an country that was struggling as much as Russia was at that time, it was an achievement. ...read more.

Middle

Having said this, the town was built and the steel works did help boost steel production massively. Overall, the town of Magnitogorsk was an achievement for Russia and it did help boost Russian economy through the huge steel works built there. Even if the community that Stalin had wanted to build was never actually created. The five year plans were not whole a success though and they didn?t always help the Russian economy. The quality of the goods being made by the Russian workers was dramatically affected by the five year plans. Stalin pushed the workers to reach production targets and this had a counter effect on the quality of goods and materials produced. Workers desperately tried to reach the targets and earn rewards etc that they were focussing mainly on the numbers they were making and not if what they were producing was up to scratch. This was not helpful to the Russian industry. The quality of goods was very important to the sales and exports. Having this drop was not what Stalin wanted and therefore, this was not what he had planned. He focussed on the numbers and there was no quality control in place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the conditions Stalin imposed upon his workers were not helpful to the improvement of the Russian industry and didn?t help reach the goals Stalin had set. In conclusion, the five year plans, although not fully, did help in transforming the Russian economy leading to the year 1941. They did this through many ways but the main ones being stains targets and the encouragement and pressure he imposed upon his workers. The pressure he imposed on them through punishments and targets that needed to be met was extreme. The workers feared if they did not maintain the standards that Stalin was after and if they did not reach the targets he had set. The workers were treated badly but were expected to work extremely hard at a very fast pace of work. This had very good results for the industry of Russia as production of raw materials etc rocketed and the targets Stalin had set, although not reached, were bought closer. Everything increased by a sizeable margin and this was an achievement. It made the Russian industry grow and strengthen. For these reasons, the five year plans were indeed successful in transforming Russian industry to the year 1941. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well written and well structured response that shows good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of Stalin's five year plans. Perhaps individual plans could have been focused on more specifically and some examples would have enhanced the argument. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    they simply enjoyed the groups almost like a summer camp or holiday; they did not recognise the significance that it held for Mussolini and the state as a whole. This is true also with the way in which the regime treated women, that the women simply did not catch on to the ideas that were being thrown at them.

  2. Discuss the success and failure of the Vienna Settlement.

    The Vienna Settlement also ignored the force of nationalism. Traditionally, European rulers inherited territories through marriage and family succession, if not through conquest and diplomatic arrangements. It was common for monarchs to rule over a foreign country where the people's languages and customs were very different from their own.

  1. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    * Most Bolsheviks accepted that in the time of war repression was necessary for the government's survival. Dzerzhinsky believed that the proletarian revolution couldn't be saved except by 'exterminating the enemies of the working class'. * Dzerzhinsky's work was complemented by Trotsky, the leader of the Red Army.

  2. How did Napoleon maintain control in France between in 1799-1814?

    Napoleon needed money because with out money he would be disadvantaged, he might lose support if there was a weak economy and Napoleon wanted to expand France through war, which he would need money to do so and by making France a greater power it would increase his popularity with the French people.

  1. How Serious Were The Problems Facing The Weimar Republic In The Years 1919-23?

    The only people prepared to defend the Weimar republic against the right were the working class. Maybe not through force but through strikes. The other uprising that took place was the Munich Putsch in 1923.

  2. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    Another way Stalin used his intelligence and cunning ways was by suppressing 'Lenin's Testament'. A long time before Lenin died there was much controversy between his relationship with Stalin. Publicly they seemed like very good friends but behind the scenes they were very cautious of each other.

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    They portrayed Stalin as a wise and benevolent ruler who was in tune with his nation and was dearly loved for what he was doing for the good of Russia. Also, because Lenin had been raised atop a mountainous social plinth of respect posthumously, Stalin ordered and doctored photographs and paintings of himself and Lenin.

  2. How successful was the National Assembly bringing equality and liberty to France during 1789-93?

    the Second Estate losing their ability to sit in the seigneurial courts because all citizens were now eligible for any office. Although, the National Assembly?s aim was to create justice, being able to gain a position in power meant that you must be educated which only people with money, like the bourgeoisie, could afford.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work