• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years to 1941?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years to 1941? By Gabriella Pink Stalin made three five-year plans spanning from 1928 to 1941. He had very different aims for each of the plans and had some very optimistic targets for the achievements of these plans. An over riding theme of each of the plans was industry. Stalin wanted to restore Russia?s hold on industry and make it a great trading power once again. The five year plans were very successful in helping building up the Russian industry. They did this through many ways, each contributing in a different manner. The production of raw materials increased dramatically thought eh five-year plans and industry on a whole became a lot more efficient. This can be seen through statistics that show the production in tonnes. Such materials as; coal, iron and steel, all rose in production quite dramatically. Iron rose from 4.2 million tonnes to 6.2 million tonnes, coal from 29.1 million tonnes to 64.3 million tonnes and steel from 4.0 million tonnes to 5.9 million tonnes. These were huge increases at that time. For an country that was struggling as much as Russia was at that time, it was an achievement. ...read more.


Having said this, the town was built and the steel works did help boost steel production massively. Overall, the town of Magnitogorsk was an achievement for Russia and it did help boost Russian economy through the huge steel works built there. Even if the community that Stalin had wanted to build was never actually created. The five year plans were not whole a success though and they didn?t always help the Russian economy. The quality of the goods being made by the Russian workers was dramatically affected by the five year plans. Stalin pushed the workers to reach production targets and this had a counter effect on the quality of goods and materials produced. Workers desperately tried to reach the targets and earn rewards etc that they were focussing mainly on the numbers they were making and not if what they were producing was up to scratch. This was not helpful to the Russian industry. The quality of goods was very important to the sales and exports. Having this drop was not what Stalin wanted and therefore, this was not what he had planned. He focussed on the numbers and there was no quality control in place. ...read more.


Overall, the conditions Stalin imposed upon his workers were not helpful to the improvement of the Russian industry and didn?t help reach the goals Stalin had set. In conclusion, the five year plans, although not fully, did help in transforming the Russian economy leading to the year 1941. They did this through many ways but the main ones being stains targets and the encouragement and pressure he imposed upon his workers. The pressure he imposed on them through punishments and targets that needed to be met was extreme. The workers feared if they did not maintain the standards that Stalin was after and if they did not reach the targets he had set. The workers were treated badly but were expected to work extremely hard at a very fast pace of work. This had very good results for the industry of Russia as production of raw materials etc rocketed and the targets Stalin had set, although not reached, were bought closer. Everything increased by a sizeable margin and this was an achievement. It made the Russian industry grow and strengthen. For these reasons, the five year plans were indeed successful in transforming Russian industry to the year 1941. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well written and well structured response that shows good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of Stalin's five year plans. Perhaps individual plans could have been focused on more specifically and some examples would have enhanced the argument. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    Therefore the extent of the actual recovery in terms of Schacht's aims and the policy's individual effects is undermined somewhat by this. But the results were very successful, and that degree of success clearly could not have achieved without the Nazi economic policy.

  2. Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period ...

    Peasant opposition was often divided and lacked a unifying cause, meaning that it was rarely successful in the 1855-1964 period. Russian Governments also had to face internal opposition from several sources. As well as individuals and parties with varying degrees of involvement in mainstream politics, this included the urban workers but also nations under Russian control.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    Russia granted a constitution to Poland, the Netherlands also had one, while the terms of the German confederation made provision for states to grant constitutions. Norway, which had not been a separate country since 1397, was given its own parliament, government army and navy.

  2. Discuss the success and failure of the Vienna Settlement.

    The Vienna Settlement also ignored the force of nationalism. Traditionally, European rulers inherited territories through marriage and family succession, if not through conquest and diplomatic arrangements. It was common for monarchs to rule over a foreign country where the people's languages and customs were very different from their own.

  1. Lenin and his Achievements.

    (New Economic Policy). In this policy the peasants were allowed to sell any produced surplus. He also gave all factories, which had less then 20 workers back to their owners3. Lenin gave the people what they wanted and managed to stay in power.

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    The gold ploughed into Austria, Prussia and Russia, known as "Pitt's cavalry", was vital not only in supporting the continental armies but also in persuading them to take up arms in the first place. It may be pointed out that this could not have been a major factor as Britain

  1. How Successful was Napoleon III's Domestic Policy?

    living standards were available for the French people, even the poorest through the ?trickle down effect? in the economy, meaning everyone has more wealth. The work of Baron H in France laid the foundations and energised a series of developments towards a more contemporary modern France and for that it can be shown that Napoleon III?s domestic policy was successful.

  2. How successful was Louis XVIII as the King of France?

    Therefore the reign of Louis XVIII would be very different to that of any other previous French monarch The reintroduction of the Bourbon Dynasty and the introduction of the charter divided France. The Ultra-royalists were very much in favour of the King and the powers he should have, whereas the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work