• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half of the 19th Century?

Extracts from this document...


How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half of the 19th Century? Alexander II carried out many measures in order to achieve a more powerful Russia and to also prevent the threat of a revolution. He formulated many reforms to accomplish this. For example, the fundamental reform: the emancipation of the Serfs, the law, the establishment of local governments, improvements in education and censorship and the military reform. Furthermore, in my opinion, the most important reform: the economic policy. Personally, each of these reforms was successful to an extent. However, each one of the reforms had disadvantages. Alexander II wanted to abolish Serfdom in order to modernise agriculture and to give the peasants an incentive to produce more. Through this method he hoped not just to gain the support of the majority of the population, but an increased food supply was needed in order for Russia to expand her industrial base and therefore overall become a more economically powerful country. This reform was successful to an extent, the Act created a class of landless peasants who moved to urban areas in search of employment in factories or mines. It began a social and economic revolution that was boost to Russia's economic strength. ...read more.


This reform had limited success because the zemstva presidents were appointed rather than elected and therefore this undermined their authority and made the new government seem unimportant and therefore the people would not take notice of their commands. However, the zemstva was successful, because it was able to operate successfully under the economic budgets they had been allowed. Many improvements were made in the provision of local services, particularly education. Leading on from my last statement, the zemstva had great success within the education reform. The standard of teaching in elementary education had been generally poor and the zemstva successfully improved the standards through administrating local primary schools through school boards. For example, there was a large increase in the number of primary schools from 8, 000 in 1856 to over 23, 000 in 1880. Furthermore, the secondary education was modernised and the number of students increased to around 800, 000 in the first decade of Alexander's reign, which indicates a successful improvement in the system. However, the further developments to liberalise the whole system of education and censorship in Russia were made impossible by the assassination attempts made on the Tsar in the later part of his reign. ...read more.


However, the reform did have some success, because the currency was stabilised when Witte conformed to the western practice in the 1890s and placed Russia on the Gold Standard. Furthermore, railway construction, financed through an increasing number of credit institution was a key element in the economic policy. The growth of railways helped to link the grain producing areas with towns, cities and ports, therefore contributing to the promotion of exports. In my opinion, this would build up the economy, which would make Russia a richer and therefore more powerful country. I have considered the reforms of Alexander II and I have well thought-out the amount of their success. In my opinion, the reforms were nothing more than 'half hearted' concessions and I believe that they had limited success; they were only significant on a small scale. Furthermore, I believe the reforms were an attempt to perpetuate the existing political system and in this way the reforms failed to create popular support for the Tsarist regime. On the other hand, the reforms were successful because they were a radical comparison to the previous Russian experience, but it did not go far enough to sustain the Tsarist regime, because in my opinion, the majority of the population desired a democracy, which the Tsar did not want to give and therefore he was fighting a losing battle. Alicia Fleming 12B History Mr Chapman Russian ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    However, it can be suggested that Alexander?s motives to emancipate the serfs are somewhat questionable. One of Alexander?s more permissible motives was that the serfs were holding Russia back economically and the country was struggling financially and industrially. Historian Victor Serge states that, ?From 1840 onwards, the need for serious

  2. How successful was the Reform Act in rectifying defects in the political system?

    the problems in the political system and there were many factors that pushed government to pass a new bill. William IV succeeded George IV who died in 1830 and due to this change of monarchy a general election took place; this therefore meant that some anti-reformers lost their seats.

  1. The British reforms to change India failed because the British would sometimes use force ...

    It showed that the British Government has no intention of giving India any choice in Home Rule. Another main stirring point in the British Raj was the Amritsar Massacre. In April 1919 a British officer in command of the Punjab region in the North of India, Brigadier-General Dyer, took strict

  2. Growth of Democracy in 19th Centuary Britain.

    The Whigs held the rest of the working class in low regard and did not want to give into the demands of the working class, yet still wanted to enact a reform that would prevent a result similar to that of the bloodshed of the French Revolution.

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    he could successfully crush all unruly elements.'12 In that Henry II reorganized the need to reform the legal system and in doing so he created the Common Law in the hope such justice would once again be resumed back into the firm governmental structure it had been under his forefather's management.

  2. How Successful Were the Reforms of Alexander II?

    Russia became divided into two groups. The Slavophiles and the Westernizers. Each group and had different views on how Russia should be reformed. The Slavophiles believed that under a different leader, (Peter), Russia had fallen into a state of disarray. They wished to "re-establish the ancient union between government and people...upon the lasting foundation of truly basic principles."

  1. How far do you agree that Alexander II brought successful reform to Russia?

    One reform was the Emancipation of the Serfs. Alexander II was given the name of 'The Tsar Liberator' because he did just that in 1861 when he 'freed' the Serfs from powerful nobles who ruled over them. The main aim of this reform was help with the industrialisation of Russia and to allow it to try and keep up with the powerful Western Europe.

  2. How successful were Peels social and economic reforms between 1841 and 1846?

    Social reforms had also become a key part of Peel?s success and became ingrained in his legacy to the working-classes. The Factory Act of 1844 reduced the working hours of children in factories and improved the safety of conditions of in factories, and the Mines Act 2 years earlier sought

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work