• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Successful Were the Religious Reforms of Somerset and Northumberland?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW SUCCESSFUL WERE THE RELIGIOUS REFORMS OF SOMERSET AND NORTHUMBERLAND? In the short period stretching from 1547 to 1553, England saw a time of uncertainty created by the speed of political and religious change during the time of underage monarch Edward VI. The fact that Edward was an underage monarch was only one of the small problems faced during his reign which was worsened by the problems left by his father Henry VIII. Religious developments and reforms during Edward's reign have often been seen as cautious and moderate reform under the Duke of Somerset and more radical changes under the Duke of Northumberland. There is some truth in this notion, though it is something of an over-simplification. Needless to say, there could be little doubt that in 1547 there would be some moves toward reforms, the question being how successful they actually were. From 1547 to 1549 the country was officially under the control of Edward Seymour (Edward VI's uncle, later known as the Duke of Somerset). Seymour was declared Protector and governor of the King's person by the Privy Council set up by Henry VIII in preparation for his death. Seymour quickly overcame many enemies on the council and assumed control of both council and control. ...read more.

Middle

yet he was also very unsuccessful in satisfying the more radical protestants due to the fact his moves were far too moderate for their disposition. The Duke of Somerset fell from power on October 1549 having his confidence undermined by the rebellions taking place in England at the time. Many councillors resented him for taking the title of 'Lord Protector' and for not being properly consulted about matters of policy. It is not immediately clear how religion was to be affected by the fall of the Duke of Somerset. However many historians are convinced of the Duke of Northumberland's (Somerset's successor) genuine belief in Protestantism. His support for the radical John Hooper certainly supports this suggestion. When Northumberland came into power in 1550, his position was insecure, mainly because he was not trusted by his conservative allies. Under the leadership of the Earl of Southampton, these allies conspired to remove him. Nevertheless, Northumberland was able to overcome this challenge in February 1550 and was thereby able to remove the conservatives from their positions within government. His defeat of the Earl of Southampton and the conservatives made sure that he would follow the protestant path. ...read more.

Conclusion

He moved far too forward, far too soon. The religious situation in England by the time that Northumberland took the chair had therefore changed dramatically from how it had been at the end of Henry VIII�s reign. Even though Somerset had sparked two rebellions supposedly due to his religious policy one can say that the ultimate cause of his downfall was the hopelessly unpopular position that he had developed amongst the people of England. Though altogether not completely successful and yet far more successful than Somerset, Northumberland knew that any religious change that he implemented could give his enemies an alibi to rebel against. It may, however, be said that some of the council radicals had found Somerset's religious policy unsatisfactorily modest. Many wanted radical change and they realised that Northumberland shared their views. In this way there was pressure put on Northumberland to take the next step towards Protestantism and to radicalise religious policy. Fortunately Northumberland believed that further radicalisation was the key process in tiding up the damage that Somerset had left behind. In this sense he was far more successful than Somerset in religious reforms as he confirmed he had popular support from a certain group of religious people and then went forward with an objective instead of 'diving in at the deep end' and leaning towards a religious outlook when not having any popular support, like Somerset. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a very well written response that advances a clear argument and offers a clear judgment in the conclusion. It is however, quite narrow in its focus with little reference to the wider public's reaction to the reforms and quotes should have been attributed to sources. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    came of it and, as Warren attests, 'No doubt John Field hoped that the classes would respond to the resentment caused by Whitgift by stimulating the growth and expansion of Presbyterianism. But noisy propaganda from the likes of Field does not prove that Whitgift's articles caused an influx of recruits to the Presbyterian position'.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Wolsey's attempt to arrange an alliance between France, England and the Pope, against the Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain - Charles, was a failure. Wolsey had attempted to gain the favour of Henry, and the Pope, rather than looking after the best interests of England.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    3 star(s)

    The drop in population, outbreaks of plaque and periodic bad harvests forced farmers and agricultural workers out of their work, or to sell part of their estate. This was almost fatal for the population, as 90% was living off the land - so with no food coming in, starvation would surely occur, especially amongst the poor.

  2. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    During the war the French captured Calais, the last English stronghold in their country. Continuing to war with France would lead to further problems and may threaten her position as queen so she would aim to make peace as soon as possible.

  1. How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half ...

    Militin introduced a series of radical reforms, which were aimed at improving the efficiency and fairness of the Russian military system therefore creating a more professional army. Furthermore, he abolished corporal punishment, reduced the length of service form 25 years to 15 years and extended the liability to all social

  2. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    described as "one of the toughest law and order bills of the 19th Century" according to Adelman and Pearce and the Municipal Corporations which led to the closure of 58 Corporations. Irish Also, another failure due to O'Connell was his backing down against the government when it banned the Monster Meeting at Clontarf, claiming that it was seditious.

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    When he finally did recall parliament in 1621 he wanted to discuss with them the marriage of his son Charles to a Spanish princess and this increased the fear of Catholicism in England because of the Spanish influence. Also the Spanish Armada had not been forgotten.

  2. How successfully did the Liberal Reforms 1906-14 meet the social needs of the British ...

    However, the scheme had it's limitations. The government admitted that it was not supposed to be a solution to elderly poverty as the maximum available pension was still 2 shillings short of Rowntree's 'poverty line'. Therefore it is clear that the Liberal reforms made a significant improvement in elderly poverty, however due to its limitations its success is debatable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work