• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the time?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the time? Britain in 1945 was reeling from the social, political and economic impact of WWII, and was united in a desire for a better world than the one which spiralled into war in the 1930s. Britain faced five main social problems which were outlined in the 1942 Beveridge report: poverty, health, education, housing, and unemployment. Attlee's Labour government tackled these issues with varied success, most notably with the creation of the National Health Service, seen by some historians as the greatest achievement of the Labour government, but by others as an overly expensive system that failed to substantially improve the lot of the average working class man. Labour also met with success in implementing National Insurance, which some historians see as providing tangible help 'from cradle to grave,' and was a "spectacular political and social achievement," (Nicholas Timmins) although some complain that National Insurance did little to solve the fundamental causes of poverty, and instead only treated the symptoms. Success was more limited in providing housing for the needy; in 1951 there was still a major deficit in available houses, although one million homes had still been built. ...read more.

Middle

By June of 1948, 90% of doctors had agreed to enter the NHS. Charles Webster, the official NHS historian, is very critical, saying that this partial privatisation resulted in a grossly unfair healthcare system which benefited the wealthy far more than the working classes. The NHS was also faced with a large backlog of untreated ailments: 8.5 million had dental treatment; and 5 million pairs of glasses were produced in the first year of the NHS. In consequence, the NHS became very expensive, costing �358 million in 1950, even though prescriptions were never completely free, which was a necessary though unfortunate aspect of the NHS. Some historians, such as Correlli Barnett, link increased welfare spending with British decline, however Robert Pearce disagrees, pointing to successful competitors who spent more on social services. Martin Pugh argues that the reforms were in fact very cost effective due to the huge benefits of a healthy population. Undoubtedly, Labour's success was very real as is evident from the vast number of prescriptions (187000 prescriptions issued by 18000 doctors in the first year) and tangible results for many millions, despite the difficult economic circumstances resulting from the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Labour's policies, according to Arthur Marwick, clearly show their commitment to the idea of a welfare stare. They provided support for the poorest; free access to decent medical care; benefits for the elderly and unemployed; and eliminated the worst in slum housing, thus, in David Dutton's view, continuing the work of the wartime coalition government. Woodroffe praises the welfare state for removing barriers and de-stigmatising poverty. While this is true, some barriers remained, such as the unfair education system, which favoured the wealthy and divided society. Pearce says that "Labour largely fulfilled its manifesto commitments, despite an adverse economic climate," and Hennessy agrees, calling Attlee's government this century's "most hyper achieving peace time administration." This is evidenced by the remarkable 347 Acts passed by the Labour government. Some historians, however, are less enthused, pointing to the lack of serious nationalisation, redistribution of wealth or social class change, saying that the fundamental causes of poverty were not tackled thoroughly enough: "One per cent of the population owned 80 per cent of the country's private capital around 1950." (Pearce) Despite these limitations, however, the Labour government of 1945 to 1951 was largely successful in reducing poverty, providing benefits, healthcare, and dealing with the social problems of the time. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. How effective were National Government of 1931-1939 in dealing with the problem of unemployment? 20 ...

    make a significant difference, unlike in Germany where Hitler created a massive public works programme in order to cut unemployment. However, many questions were raised supporting the negative actions that made the aftermath situation of the great depression worse. One of the unpopular actions was the introduction of the means test in 1931.

  2. The First English Civil War

    Bristol, the second port of the kingdom, was their objective. On 26 July, four days from the opening of the siege, it was in their hands. Waller, with the beaten remnant of his army at Bath, was powerless to intervene. The effect of this blow was felt even in Dorset.

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    nations of the earth", became a symbol and an inspiring memory, very dear to future revolutionary nationalists. In the years succeeding the fruitless uprising of Emmet, there was a political vacuum in Irish politics. However, this was gap soon filled by the pragmatic and enigmatic constitutionalist, named Daniel O'Connell.

  2. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    whose role was to oversee the emancipation, insisted that the Mir should become the centre of rural life and therefore local control; the Mir would provide effective organisation for the collection of taxes and was responsible for maintaining order. Agricultural policy also dictated the control of the peasants.

  1. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    to the soldiers and which stated that 'all military units were to elect committees from their members', 'all military units were to elect representatives to the Petrograd Soviet', 'the orders of the Petrograd Soviet should take priority over the orders of the Provisional Government' and that 'all weapons were to

  2. Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798

    Following the "compact theory" advocated first by Madison and Jefferson in 1798, Calhoun declared that South Carolina could declare the tariff unconstitutional and not collect it. This led to the Webster-Hayne Debate, in which Hayne, prot�g� of Calhoun, debated over slavery and nullification against Daniel Webster.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Further discontent was caused when a peaceful demonstration in Amritsar on the 13th April 1919, descended into massacre when Brigadier-General Dyer opened fire on thousands of unarmed civilians, who were unable to escape. Considered ?one of the most brutal episodes in the history of the Raj?,[17] nearly four hundred people were killed; it was followed by public floggings and humiliation.

  2. How effectively did colonial governments respond to the rise of nationalism in Southeast Asia ...

    But the attempts of the PKI did have an effect on the Netherlands Parliament which, in an effort to appease the nationalists brought about some changes in the constitution of the Volksraad in 1925.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work