• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the time?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the time? Britain in 1945 was reeling from the social, political and economic impact of WWII, and was united in a desire for a better world than the one which spiralled into war in the 1930s. Britain faced five main social problems which were outlined in the 1942 Beveridge report: poverty, health, education, housing, and unemployment. Attlee's Labour government tackled these issues with varied success, most notably with the creation of the National Health Service, seen by some historians as the greatest achievement of the Labour government, but by others as an overly expensive system that failed to substantially improve the lot of the average working class man. Labour also met with success in implementing National Insurance, which some historians see as providing tangible help 'from cradle to grave,' and was a "spectacular political and social achievement," (Nicholas Timmins) although some complain that National Insurance did little to solve the fundamental causes of poverty, and instead only treated the symptoms. Success was more limited in providing housing for the needy; in 1951 there was still a major deficit in available houses, although one million homes had still been built. ...read more.

Middle

By June of 1948, 90% of doctors had agreed to enter the NHS. Charles Webster, the official NHS historian, is very critical, saying that this partial privatisation resulted in a grossly unfair healthcare system which benefited the wealthy far more than the working classes. The NHS was also faced with a large backlog of untreated ailments: 8.5 million had dental treatment; and 5 million pairs of glasses were produced in the first year of the NHS. In consequence, the NHS became very expensive, costing �358 million in 1950, even though prescriptions were never completely free, which was a necessary though unfortunate aspect of the NHS. Some historians, such as Correlli Barnett, link increased welfare spending with British decline, however Robert Pearce disagrees, pointing to successful competitors who spent more on social services. Martin Pugh argues that the reforms were in fact very cost effective due to the huge benefits of a healthy population. Undoubtedly, Labour's success was very real as is evident from the vast number of prescriptions (187000 prescriptions issued by 18000 doctors in the first year) and tangible results for many millions, despite the difficult economic circumstances resulting from the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Labour's policies, according to Arthur Marwick, clearly show their commitment to the idea of a welfare stare. They provided support for the poorest; free access to decent medical care; benefits for the elderly and unemployed; and eliminated the worst in slum housing, thus, in David Dutton's view, continuing the work of the wartime coalition government. Woodroffe praises the welfare state for removing barriers and de-stigmatising poverty. While this is true, some barriers remained, such as the unfair education system, which favoured the wealthy and divided society. Pearce says that "Labour largely fulfilled its manifesto commitments, despite an adverse economic climate," and Hennessy agrees, calling Attlee's government this century's "most hyper achieving peace time administration." This is evidenced by the remarkable 347 Acts passed by the Labour government. Some historians, however, are less enthused, pointing to the lack of serious nationalisation, redistribution of wealth or social class change, saying that the fundamental causes of poverty were not tackled thoroughly enough: "One per cent of the population owned 80 per cent of the country's private capital around 1950." (Pearce) Despite these limitations, however, the Labour government of 1945 to 1951 was largely successful in reducing poverty, providing benefits, healthcare, and dealing with the social problems of the time. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why Did The Wartime Alliance Break Down?

    The Russian excuse was that there were increased forces advancing on the Soviet troops which didn't allow them to further.

  2. How effective were National Government of 1931-1939 in dealing with the problem of unemployment? 20 ...

    make a significant difference, unlike in Germany where Hitler created a massive public works programme in order to cut unemployment. However, many questions were raised supporting the negative actions that made the aftermath situation of the great depression worse. One of the unpopular actions was the introduction of the means test in 1931.

  1. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    Furthermore, much of the production still took place in small workshops; in cottage industry rather than heavy industry. This suggests that the government had failed to fully industrialise and modernise the economy by 1914. Furthermore, whilst a peasant proletariat existed, the fact that they would return to the commune for

  2. The First English Civil War

    Cambridge), where the danger of attack from the north was near enough to induce great energy in the preparations for meeting it, and at the same time, too distant effectively to interfere with these preparations. Above all, the Eastern Association was from the first, guided and inspired by Colonel Cromwell.

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    The first reaction to the passing of the Act of Union was Robert Emmet's unsuccessful rising of 1803, where he was soon easily captured, tried and executed. Without Emmet, and namely his highly rhetorical epitaph proclaiming that no man should write his epitaph until Ireland "takes her place among the

  2. Could The Division Of Germany Been Avoided In 1949?

    be their fault, maybe if they had gone about it another way, it could have been avoided, but on the other hand, was it possible to go about it another way?

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    The necessity of the implementation of this measure shows the threat which was posed by protesters, but it deeply disappointed Indian leaders. It gave Gandhi a cause for resistance, having assumed the unofficial leadership of Congress, he called for ?hartal? to be observed on the 6th April 1919, and Indians

  2. How effectively did colonial governments respond to the rise of nationalism in Southeast Asia ...

    Having nipped the rebellion in the bud, the Dutch struck at the PKI, by banning it and having its members either exiled or interned in New Guinea. Thus, ended the initial attempts of the militant, left-wing nationalists to oust the Dutch by the use of force whilst the leadership of the nationalist movement reverted to more moderate parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work