• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of the Cold War?

Extracts from this document...


How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of the Cold War? The decade of 1953 through to 1962 began with the conclusion of the Korean War and ended with the almost catastrophic Cuban Missile crisis in October of 1962. The Korean War and the Cuban missile crisis represent two of the most tense periods of 20th century history, and rarely did nuclear war seem such a frightening possibility as at these times. Yet the period between has often been described as a thaw, if only a temporary one, which was brought about by the death of Stalin and the process of de-Stalinisation, undertaken by Khrushchev, which led to more communication and understanding between East and West. However, despite the relative success of events such as the Geneva congress of 1955, it is important to recognise that tensions still existed during this period, a fact which was demonstrated by the crisis in Berlin in 1958 and with the eventual construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961. In addition to this, the almost indifferent response to the Hungarian Uprising of 1956 from the West did not reveal concerns which remained prominent, and events such as the Communist take-over of Cuba and the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961, orchestrated by the CIA meant that relations during this period continued to be strained. Any examination of the relative levels of cold war tension during these years must take into account the strained relations of the post-war era prior to 1953. It was at this time that Europe became divided into two camps, with the nations of Western Europe such as France and West Germany looking to the US and relying upon aid arriving as a result of the Truman doctrine and Marshall aid program for economic survival whilst Stalin's Soviet Union gradually absorbed countries such as Romania and Hungary. ...read more.


During Truman's presidency, fear of Communism had been the most important factor in determining foreign policy, and this had a knock-on effect on domestic policy. Following Stalin's death and Eisenhower's election, American priorities changed slightly, as the USSR no longer appeared to be expanding further and as the nations of Western Europe gradually gained in strength and economic independence. It would be extremely simplistic to conclude that as a result of the factors mentioned above, the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of the Cold War. There were several events and decisions which led to increased tensions which could have escalated to the level of the Cuban missile crisis, and Khrushchev's foreign policy remained at best confusing and at worst schizophrenic. Problems emerged in 1955, at the same time as the 'Spirit of Geneva' had led to increased optimism about future relations, when West Germany was granted entrance to NATO. NATO had been set up 1949 as a treaty of collective security, involving nations such as the US, Great Britain, Belgium and Holland. Although its members would not openly admit it, it was clearly an anti-Soviet alliance. Western aid had been pouring into West Germany since its formal split, and by 1955 it had grown into a powerful nation once again. To the West, it was inconceivable that such a strong and prosperous capitalist nation should be denied entry into NATO due to its history, and in 1955 entry was granted. The main result of this was that West Germany was allowed to re-arm. The USSR was extremely unhappy about this, but also used it as a pretext to set up the Warsaw Pact in 1955. The Russians claimed that the Warsaw pact had been set up to resist future German aggression, and to protect Poland from German revanchism, arguing that they would wish to retake their territory up to the Oder Neisse Line. Ostensibly, this was the motivation behind the formulation of the Warsaw pact, although the USSR had been waiting for a legitimate opportunity to set up an organisation of Eastern European nations to give some security against NATO. ...read more.


In the end, following the advice of his executive committee (EXCOM), which included people such as MacNamara and Acheson, he set up a blockade around Cuba to prevent the arrival of further missiles on convoys from the USSR. As the Soviet ships headed towards the blockade, many Americans feared the consequences if they refused to stop, and there was a real possibility that the situation could have escalated into a nuclear war. Clearly, October 1962 does not represent a relaxation of the Cold War, although it is interesting to note that both leaders handled the situation excellently, and it was resolved once the US promised to remove their missiles from Turkey in exchange for a Soviet withdrawal from Cuba. The resolution of the crisis meant that neither leader felt humiliated, and nuclear war was prevented. Although this was arguably the closest the world came to nuclear conflict, the relaxation of tension and events of the preceding years undoubtedly meant that the effects were not as disastrous as they could have been, since communication between the USSR and the USA was clear and concise, and both sides were aware of the capabilities of their opposition. Hence it is correct to say that the period between 1953 and 1962 saw a relaxation of the Cold War. During this time, East/West relations improved dramatically as a result of the rise to power of Khrushchev, who was far more prepared to co-operate and co-exist with the West. There were several occasions where the two nations could be seen to be reaching some form of agreement, such as at Geneva in 1955, and ironically, over the issue of Cuba in 1962, and despite the fact that there were several occasions where relations were extremely strained, such as in Berlin in 1958 and relating to the take-over of Cuba in 1961, the tension never erupted into a full-scale conflict. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How far do you agree that the Cold War broke out in Europe because ...

    4 star(s)

    that the USSR's refusal to participate exhibited their hostility and accentuated mistrust among the two nations. It also signified a start of Soviet insurgence physically against the USA. Also, Stalin considered it essential to destroy Germany's capacity for another war, which directly clashed with the US desire to rebuild Germany as the economic centre of a stable Europe.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    The airlift was their way of calling his bluff. Stalin had no choice but to call off the blockade, since the only other way to get the Allies out of Berlin would have been by force. That would have led to a 3rd world war.

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    This was to be the basis for the invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The Vietnam War The impact of the war upon the peoples of the USA and Vietnam The USA The most important event in the war in changing US opinion against the war is now believed to have been the Tet Offensive.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold ...

    Truman's doctrine shows that he was doing exactly the same as Stalin in 'claiming' these countries in order to boost their ideology. Stalin and Truman wanted to claim Greece as it was a valuable country in terms of location, on the border of the Eastern and Western Bloc.

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    an indication that the Americans might be using the threat of the bomb to force the USSR to make concessions. The secrecy and spies indicate the high levels of skepticism within the Grand Alliance throughout the war even. Thus, the Soviet response to the US atomic bomb of initiating a breakneck programme of developing their own atomic could be justified.

  2. To what extent was the Korean conflict of 1950 to 1953 a 'turning point' ...

    of increasing military spending, and had thus contributed to the militarisation of the conflict as a whole. American advocacy for West German rearmament and sovereignty differed significantly from earlier policy as well. In the past, after German defeat in World War II, the USA had feared the recrudescence of German aggression.

  1. Placing nuclear weapons in Cuba was a reckless piece of international gambling by Khrushchev ...

    to the point where after the weapons had been put in Cuba it could've just sparked a total war due to those strained relationships.

  2. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    The Austrian State Treaty made this reunification a reality, and after it was signed, all the Allied soldiers left the country. Another country that had been suffering from post war agreements was Finland, which had been under Nazi control during WW2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work