• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How united was the civil rights movement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How united was the Civil Rights movement from 1865 to 1992? During the years from 1865 to 1992, many groups and individuals worked as part of the Civil Rights Movement. At times, these groups worked successfully together to bring about positive change for African Americans. However, due to the diversity of the different groups involved in the movement, there were also divisions. These divisions were caused by differences in the ideas of leaders of the movement, different techniques used by the Civil Rights groups and opposing aims within the movement. The aims of the Civil Rights Movement were important, as it would have been most successful at times when all the groups involved were working towards a clear common aim. The main period of division was the 1960s, and this was largely due to the differing aims of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, two key individuals in the movement. Martin Luther King's main aim was to bring about desegregation in the South, and for black people to have the same rights as white people. This was a complete contrast the views of Malcolm X, who believed economic change was more important than desegregation, and called for a separate black state, showing that he didn't feel it was possible for African Americans to gain equality in the same way that Martin Luther King did. ...read more.

Middle

The early 1960s were a time when all Civil Rights groups felt they could work together, as the Council of Community Organisation was formed in 1963, creating a sense of unity between different groups. The 1963 march on Washington showed how united the movement was at this point, as the majority of Civil Rights groups took part, including the SCLC, SNCC and CORE. All the groups seemed to have a similar sense of purpose, showing that, although they may have had differing views and ideas, they were willing and able to work together, because as well as taking part, all three groups helped plan the march. The march also demonstrated how, at this point, the movement had a lot of white support, increasing the sense of unity and showing the growing popularity of the movement. The 1960s wasn't the first time there had been signs of division in the movement, as the NAACP and CORE had been seen as opposing groups since the Second World, when CORE was formed. The NAACP focused completely on taking the legal route, presenting cases of discrimination to the Supreme Court in order to get desegregation and acts of racism declared unconstitutional. This contrasts with the more direct approach of CORE, who, while not supporting violent action at this point, used more direct forms of protest than the NAACP. ...read more.

Conclusion

At this time, Congress generally supported the ideas of Kennedy, and were willing to pass legislation to help advance Civil Rights. This could have been because of the growing popularity of the movement, or the fact that a number of protests and marches held in the early 1960s, when the movement was relatively united, had successfully raised awareness of the problem faced by black people. The cooperation of Congress continued into the 1980s, when it was very liberal and willing to pass more Civil Rights legislation, such as the 1982 Voting Rights Act, despite the fact that President Reagan wasn't cooperative like Kennedy. Even when the Federal Government wasn't united in its views towards Civil Rights, it was still possible to make progress. The same idea can be applied to the Civil Rights Movement itself, as, despite the divisions that were sometimes present, the movement was still able to make significant progress. The lack of unity wasn't severe enough to greatly hinder the movement, and could almost be seen as a positive thing, as the differences were mainly based around the differences between North and South. The different approaches meant that all areas were being covered, and all the relevant issues were being dealt with. This made the Civil Rights Movement successful, and examples of unity, such as the 1963 march on Washington, show that despite their differences, groups within the movement could work together when they needed to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    favour of more conservative whites, and in doing so, not appreciating the problems of the black population as a whole. Malcolm X promoted his views of separatism by describing the whites as an evil race that had oppressed African Americans for hundreds of years and were institutionally racist.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    Washington, as did William Taft. However, despite the apparently good intentions of these Presidents, they took very little action on the issue, preferring instead to appease the south by allowing state governments to continue to pass Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.

  1. Compare the aims, methods and achievements of MLK and Malcolm X. Which man do ...

    This is because non-violent protest raised awareness while making it hard for police to use violence to disperse protesters. Also, I believe that such mass action made it difficult for politicians to ignore the plight of African-American people in the 1960s.

  2. Why did the Civil Rights Movement emerge in the 1950s?

    The second important example of direct action was in 1955/56, the Montgomery Bus Boycott. As a result of the boycott the civil rights movement gained a leader, King, and due to its publicity through the media it also gained global and international awareness resulting in inspiring other movements and victory in desegregation.

  1. Short term impact of Malcolm X

    that he would "have to go to the people first and let the leaders fall in behind them."36 Without, Malcolm's courageous stance and alternate approach then the movement may not have progressed as it did and other leaders such as Stokely Carmichael may not have benefited as much.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    Chief of the Army and Navy', under Article II, section 2 of the United States Constitution. The law freed an estimated 4 million slaves, and effectively ended the American Civil War. In a particular paragraph, King uses language to convey that change should happen immediately, not gradually.

  1. How far was peaceful protest responsible for the successes of the civil rights movement ...

    In the context of the Cold War, this was highly embarrassing for America, who was supposed to be fighting for freedom internationally while quashing it domestically. The fact that this footage was used directly in context of the Cold War, embarrassed the government into taking action, and convinced Kennedy for the need of a civil rights act.

  2. How far was Martin Luther King's leadership responsible for the gains made by the ...

    Also, the Poor People?s Campaign was misjudged by King as President Johnson made it clear that he didn?t support the plan due to the split views on the Vietnam War and the diverted resources the war created away from social projects designed to promote social justice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work