• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

BRITISH HISTORY: SOURCES COURSEWORK Target 1: Evaluation of sources for their utility How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? An historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War needs to be wary when considering sources A, B and C, as all three have limitations. Source C is written by Haig's son in defence of the actions of his father, a general in the First World War, so obviously will not criticize him. Source C is also of limited value as it was written a long time after the War and Earl Haig was not a soldier in the First World War, so knowledge he thinks he has of the soldiers attitudes towards their commanders may be distorted. Sources A and B are limited in that they are the opinions of a cartoonist and a TV program, which are not necessarily representative of how the soldiers felt towards their commanders. ...read more.

Middle

This statement is a solid argument as at the time that the First World War ended, General Haig was seen as a hero. He had a State Funeral and tens of thousands of his old soldiers watched his coffin pass. It was really after the 1930s and again in the 1960s and 70s that criticism of Haig and the way the First World War had been fought really escalated. Most of these critics had had no experience of the First World War and so their criticisms were based on their opinions and not on the attitudes of the soldiers to their commanders in the First World War. As Earl Haig writes in Source C, 'When the old soldiers who fought in the war were alive, I never heard a word of criticism from them.' This indicates that the attitudes of the soldiers towards Haig in the First World War were not of criticism and disdain as Sources A and B would have us believe, but of gratitude that he had led them to victory. ...read more.

Conclusion

None of the sources are actually first hand accounts of how soldiers felt about their commanders during the War and all three are biased. Source C is the most useful as it speaks about the views of some old soldiers towards a commander in the First World War, and it offers some argument as to why the author thinks his opinion is the correct one. Sources A and B are biased and do not offer any justification for the views expressed in them. The messages expressed in each source may be representative of how some of the soldiers felt about their commanders, but neither Sources A, B or C are able to capture the attitudes of every soldier towards their commanders during the First World War. So while each source may be helpful to an historian in some respect, they need to be looked at along with other sources, accounts and knowledge for a valid conclusion to be reached about the attitudes of soldiers towards their commanders during the First World War, if indeed, a conclusion can be drawn. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Sources Question

    The fact that the Viet Cong treated the peasants much better made them want to support them rather than the Americans who showed little respect. The US troops moved many of the Vietnamese into tempory Hamlets which did not please them so the feelings felt towards the US troops were not good at all.

  2. American History.

    were very optimistic, and the mills operated on the paternalistic Lowell System, which provided the women with good working conditions. - But from 1837 - 1842, demand for cloth declined and the mills worked only part-time, causing managers to pressure workers by speeding out the machines, giving each girl more

  1. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    The media was changing people's views as it showed he reality of the war and was also one of the main reasons why people were beginning to feel strongly opposed to the war. 6. Study all the sources The writer of Source M believes that television played an important part in changing people's attitudes to the Vietnam War.

  2. Explain the Changing Attitudes of Civilians and British Soldiers Towards the War

    These restrictions are likely to affect the attitudes of many civilians, although the changes took place gradually. Propaganda worked in conjunction with recruitment (until 1916 when conscription was introduced). This propaganda was intended to portray a particular message. Its purpose was to keep morale high.

  1. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    How is the reaction to the dropping of the first atomic bomb represented in source F? Why was it represented in this way? (ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATION/INTERPRETATION, RELIABILITY) Source F is photograph taken after the dropping of the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima.

  2. Interpretations of The First World War.

    There is debris, which is made up of rocks, scraps of the soldier's uniforms and tree twigs when they have been hit and flown off into the trench. This debris is strewn all about the trench; it looks like it hosts the perfect conditions for bacteria and rodents to live.

  1. Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 Sources Questions

    When it says, "destroy this mad brute," it does not necessarily mean that to help destroy Germany you must go and physically fight. You could, for example, work in factories constructing weapons or be a part of the land army.

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    Both are secret memorandums, but this does not guarantee their accuracy, it simply indicates that the author was making objective judgments. Bertie's and Sanderson's thoughts, like that of Vierordt would not have influenced the nature of Weltpolitik, as they were not in a position to do so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work