• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A-C for explaining why the U.S.A became involved in the Vietnam War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework By Alix Shepherd 1. How useful are sources A-C for explaining why the U.S.A became involved in the Vietnam War? The U.S.A felt that they owed it to the South Vietnamese. They had always "offered support" and now the Vietcong were trying to invade and turn South Vietnam into a communist state. America intervened and attempted to prevent the 'Domino Theory' from continuing. Also, America felt that they were the strength and backbone of the world as they offered financial and military support to other countries, like Britain in World War 2. Source A has Johnson speaking in April 1965, a month after the start of Operation Rolling Thunder (O.R.T was the name of the American bombing campaign over Vietnam). There aren't any questions or doubts about the invasion and because he is, presumably, speaking publicly, he doesn't want to in store doubt in the minds of the people, as he needs their support for this to undergo. Also it could be argued that he is trying to justify himself before anyone thinks to question his decision or his methods. Johnson also felt inclined to prevent the Vietcong because if he didn't stand up to the communists now, then they would 'chase him' until he was willing to fight. ...read more.

Middle

The actual effect of the bombing is shown in source E, where there is a little girl covered in napalm. Napalm was a thick jelly like substance that stuck to the skin and for as long as it was in contact with the air, it would burn, all the way down to the bone. This picture was one of the most horrific in the war. It became a poster for anti-war demonstrations, showing that the Americans were indiscriminate. There was much deliberation over the Vietnam War because it was so publicised and open with the media. The amount of media attention towards the war was remarkable. Source F also shows the difficulty of fighting a guerrilla war. It points out the simple problem of basic knowledge of the jungle and that the Americans didn't have any! Also how they weren't winning any respect by burning down the villages that were suspected to be harbouring Vietcong. The Americans were murdering civilians, dropping hundreds of thousands tonnes of napalm and drowning the jungle in 'Agent Orange', a weed killer which destroyed the coarse, thick trees. American soldiers re-told their tales to newspapers or in television studios. In source G, a solider gave his reactions to the 'My Lai' massacre, shooting of innocent South Vietnamese civilians. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source J is very beneficial when answering the question. Nobody protested against WW2 because all the massacre and truth was kept hidden away, but because of all the easily accessible pictures etc, it was extremely easy for protesters to find something. All anti war demonstrations were all keep on television as well. Source K is also to do with television because in history, the country always wanted their men still fighting but because all the Australian's could see what was happening to their men and to the American soldiers, they were against the war. Source L is incredibly helpful because all the views are to do with the fact that television had something to do with losing the war. They all agree that it did. In conclusion, I believe that television did play a role in America losing the war but because of the problems that they faced with Guerrilla warfare anyway, it wasn't that important. No one in the media wanted to draw attention to them so the kept blaming the fact that it was a Guerrilla war and the Government didn't want to admit that they had lot a war for the first time so they blamed it on the press. It's too difficult to say really, but both are just reasons. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    World War One Sources Question

    3 star(s)

    Another new technology was gas, the Germans first used it in 1915 but it was soon used by British and French. However the Germans used it on a far greater scale than that of the Allies. When it was first used none of the troops knew what to do but soon gas masks were distributed to both sides.

  2. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    There seems little reason to disbelieve what they are saying. This source may be reliable because they seem to want to tell it how it really was. This source could be reliable because they were admitting that what they did wrong wrong.

  1. American History.

    *The Headright System and Indentured Servitude* - The major problem the colonists faced even from the beginning of the tobacco cultivation was a labor shortage, as tobacco was a very labor-intensive crop. This problem resulted in the introduction of the headright system in 1617 by the Virginia Company.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    Therefore it is more than likely that as the death toll rose and more soldiers returned home after their one year stays the U.S government lowered it's standards in what makes a United States soldier. So obviously these 'dumb' soldiers would have more trouble adapting to the new environment, as well as becoming burdens to other soldiers.

  1. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    However, I do not feel that these three sources alone are informative enough to tell us fully about all aspects of a US soldiers' duty for us to build up an entire image. We do not see enough information about the conflicts with the Vietnamese troops or how much the troops feared dying.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    they had been watching the failures and innocent lives being lost many more people would have been opposed to Vietnam. However, the source does not say how many people were asked and what kind of people were asked so it may not be entirely accurate.

  1. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    The targets were not limited to protesting students. Two of the four who had been killed were simply on their way to class. Most of the Guardsmen later testified that they turned and fired because everyone else had. The question of who fired the first shot, or gave the order to fire, has never been answered.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    President Johnson actually said that he felt the war is not 'worth fighting' and is not really important to Americans, but they were forced into fighting in the war and once they got involved they could not escape. Source B was a private conversation which was said in May 1964.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work