• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A-C for explaining why the U.S.A became involved in the Vietnam War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework By Alix Shepherd 1. How useful are sources A-C for explaining why the U.S.A became involved in the Vietnam War? The U.S.A felt that they owed it to the South Vietnamese. They had always "offered support" and now the Vietcong were trying to invade and turn South Vietnam into a communist state. America intervened and attempted to prevent the 'Domino Theory' from continuing. Also, America felt that they were the strength and backbone of the world as they offered financial and military support to other countries, like Britain in World War 2. Source A has Johnson speaking in April 1965, a month after the start of Operation Rolling Thunder (O.R.T was the name of the American bombing campaign over Vietnam). There aren't any questions or doubts about the invasion and because he is, presumably, speaking publicly, he doesn't want to in store doubt in the minds of the people, as he needs their support for this to undergo. Also it could be argued that he is trying to justify himself before anyone thinks to question his decision or his methods. Johnson also felt inclined to prevent the Vietcong because if he didn't stand up to the communists now, then they would 'chase him' until he was willing to fight. ...read more.

Middle

The actual effect of the bombing is shown in source E, where there is a little girl covered in napalm. Napalm was a thick jelly like substance that stuck to the skin and for as long as it was in contact with the air, it would burn, all the way down to the bone. This picture was one of the most horrific in the war. It became a poster for anti-war demonstrations, showing that the Americans were indiscriminate. There was much deliberation over the Vietnam War because it was so publicised and open with the media. The amount of media attention towards the war was remarkable. Source F also shows the difficulty of fighting a guerrilla war. It points out the simple problem of basic knowledge of the jungle and that the Americans didn't have any! Also how they weren't winning any respect by burning down the villages that were suspected to be harbouring Vietcong. The Americans were murdering civilians, dropping hundreds of thousands tonnes of napalm and drowning the jungle in 'Agent Orange', a weed killer which destroyed the coarse, thick trees. American soldiers re-told their tales to newspapers or in television studios. In source G, a solider gave his reactions to the 'My Lai' massacre, shooting of innocent South Vietnamese civilians. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source J is very beneficial when answering the question. Nobody protested against WW2 because all the massacre and truth was kept hidden away, but because of all the easily accessible pictures etc, it was extremely easy for protesters to find something. All anti war demonstrations were all keep on television as well. Source K is also to do with television because in history, the country always wanted their men still fighting but because all the Australian's could see what was happening to their men and to the American soldiers, they were against the war. Source L is incredibly helpful because all the views are to do with the fact that television had something to do with losing the war. They all agree that it did. In conclusion, I believe that television did play a role in America losing the war but because of the problems that they faced with Guerrilla warfare anyway, it wasn't that important. No one in the media wanted to draw attention to them so the kept blaming the fact that it was a Guerrilla war and the Government didn't want to admit that they had lot a war for the first time so they blamed it on the press. It's too difficult to say really, but both are just reasons. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    As they were burning those innocent people, children and destroying the land. They were bitterly criticised, the Americans started to question, "Why America have to be involved with something which is nothing to do with the U.S?" Using Napalm affected the Vietcong but it also affected the U.S troops.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    It seemed to them that the peasants themselves wanted communism and that they were fighting for no one. When they returned home to America many of them spread these views and feelings among the American people, telling them that the Vietnamese peasants they were fighting for had turned on them

  1. American History.

    - Subsequently, a group of Congregationalist merchants obtained a royal charter in 1629 and formed the Massachusetts Bay Company, which soon attracted middle-class Puritans who were concerned about the deteriorating situation in England. Although they remained committed to reforming the Anglican Church, they felt they would be better able to continue in America.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    This meant America was fighting an unseen enemy. 4. Study Sources F, G and I. How useful are these sources as evidence of the public's reaction in the USA to the Vietnam War in the mid-1960's? Source F shows how the majority of the US public felt about Vietnam.

  1. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    However, we can assume that this source is reasonably reliable as we know that missions such as the one described in letter did occur and were indiscriminate, for example, the My Lai Massacre. The newspaper, which published this, was probably a supporter of the Peace Movement as this information is definitely against the war in Vietnam.

  2. Use the sources and your knowledge of American history to explain why there has ...

    One of these historians (Hugh Brogan) said that the complexities of modern government required the executive branch to take over some of the responsibilities from the legislative. There is much support for this in both Source F and in Source B. Source F portrays FDR as a strong, active man who is ready to take action.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    After he had this conversation, it was published to the public of America, which was not good for him, because he was the man who sent troops into Vietnam, and if he is not backing his idea, then the American public would not back his idea.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    marked a sharp increase in the state actors compared to the end of World War II.National emancipation which started in the 1950s saw a lot of former colonies getting independence and this brought an increase in the number of actors in the international system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work