• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A to C in explaining why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A to C in explaining why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam? In this essay I will assess the usefulness of sources A to C in determining the reasoning for American involvement in the Vietnamese war. Source A is reasonably useful in shoeing how the U.S government wanted the general public to view them and their reasoning for the country's actions in Vietnam. Although source A does not state to whom the speaker (President Linden Johnson) is addressing this information. However, the mere fact that it is Johnson speaking, influences the reader to assume that it an audience of the general public that he is talking to. The time upon which he gave this speech is also very significant, as it was April 1965, one month after major bombing operation "Rolling Thunder". This made the speech more significant as president Johnson was attempting to explain and justify the reasoning behind the major attacks that were taking place. ...read more.


This and other statements such as "I don't think it's worth fighting for. And I don't think we can get out," show that in may 1964 president Johnson was clearly against the war. Yet by the time of source A (approximately one year later) Johnson had ordered a mass "surgical" bombing of North Vietnam, named "Operation Rolling Thunder." Therefore by this point Johnson had either drastically altered his views on the war or had succumbed to the pressure of knowing how horrifically tainted the images of himself and his party would become if he ordered a mass withdrawal from Vietnam. It is safe to assume that the latter is correct, as Johnson talks about this pressure in source B saying "They'd bring a president down if he ran out wouldn't they?" This refers back to the reaction of the public and other politicians, which most likely be accusations of indecision towards his party (Democratic) on matters such as the involvement in Vietnam and the general "Containment" of communism. ...read more.


All these things contributed to the mass destruction of the South Vietnamese farms and forestation. This happened in America's desperation to locate the rebel militia the Vietcong, and stop the use of guerrilla tactics against largely unaware U.S troops. However in attempting this the U.S forces damaged much of the Vietnamese agricultural lifestyle. And on occasion, American soldiers in frustration in their inability to locate the Vietcong would burn down whole villages at the nearest suspicion that they were helping the Vietcong. Later in source C Chomsky talks of how "The U.S did not want and independent Vietnam..." He is saying that America did not want to allow Vietnam to decide their own future, and they did not want Vietnam to slip out of their strong Capitalist grip or "orbit." To conclude, I believe that source A is the most useful in showing the reasons for U.S involvement. As it show all the pressures Johnson was under. The pressure to keep "promises" and the pressure to contain communism and prevent the domino theory, But most of all it shows the lie that he was forced to tell the public simply because it was what they wanted to hear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    Also it can be propaganda. It was written after 15 years, which makes it a as a secondary source. The photograph shows younger people participating in the anti-war protests. It shows a huge amount of people participating. The photograph could be reliable as it is often harder to lie by photographs.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    This was another reason the USA stepped up involvement in Vietnam. They had started off this campaign with confidence, but after a while American began to wonder if they were doing any good. So the US government and army increased involvement to prove to its own people that they were doing the right thing.

  1. Why was the United States forced to withdraw its soldiers from the Vietnam war

    They were organized to be part of the antiwar movement. Their main approach consisted of policies like resistance to the draft. In 1968 they organized a major protest in front of the Democratic National Convention.

  2. Why Did the United States of America Become Involved In Vietnam?

    then this would shake the value of an American commitment and in the value of an American word. Also the battle would become renewed in one country and then another, this referring to the domino theory, from President Eisen Hower, the Americans want to stay in south East Asia as the Americans did in Europe.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Finally, in terms of its unreliability, as we are looking back in hindsight, we know that President Johnson is lying to the public, so therefore it is unreliable. Overall, Source A is reliable in its context, as it does give reasons why America joined the war in Vietnam, as they wanted independence for South Vietnam and wanted to remain loyal.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    Moreover, the Soviet Union had armed itself with technical knowledge about the atomic bomb using information from its espionage network that included Klaus Fuchs embedded in the Manhattan Project, Donald Maclean and the Cambridge Five, and Ethel and Julius Rosenberg.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam.

    any form of opposition and imprisoned many antagonists, and there was also the fact that in a Buddhist country, they had a Catholic Prime Minister. The US backed the Prime Minister Diem whilst the SU and China provided North Vietnam with aid, weapons and food.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    Theories are often subjected to different debates because they give different meanings of similar events and this often causes situations where one theory will provide a better explanation of one event than another. These theories also change in line with the changing nature of international politics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work