• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the Vietnam war?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the Vietnam war? Source A: Source A is about US fear of communism. The nature of this source is a presidential speech to the US public. It is clear that source A is a primary source as it says on the bottom 'president Lyndon B Johnson speaking in April 1965.' That shows that the source is a primary one. There is a great possibility that the US presidential advisors produced this source to give president Lyndon B Johnson a speech to publish in front of the US public, one month after operation 'Rolling Thunder', which was a military operation, in which the US forces used massive fire power against North-Vietnamese forces. The aim and purpose of this source is to persuade the US public to back and understand the United States' violence in Vietnam, and to justify the president's actions in Vietnam to his nation. After the Second World War, France found it difficult to maintain control over indo-china. America supplied $1.2 billion of military aid to the French forces but in 1954, after a serious defeat in the battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French government decided to withdraw from Vietnam. At the Geneva conference, May 1954, it was agreed that elections would be held within two years and that in the meantime Vietnam would be divided into two halves with North Vietnam under the control of communist, Ho Chi Minh. These elections did not take place and the United States continued to supply military aid and advisors to help protect South Vietnam from communist guerrillas (national liberation front). On August 2nd 1964, North Vietnamese torpedo boats attacked the US destroyer Maddox. The United States government retaliated by bombing North Vietnamese naval bases and oil refineries. In March 1965, president Lyndon B Johnson started sending troops to South Vietnam to protect a government that appeared to be in danger of falling to the national liberation front. ...read more.


He believed that the United States did not want an independent South Vietnam that was no longer dominated by America. He also believed that the US feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself and develop its economy the US feared that because they wanted to dominate and control the south. This source contains information on what Noam Chomsky thought about the war in Vietnam. It shows what he believed on why the US got involved in the Vietnam War. It also shows that professor Noam Chomsky did not like the US's actions in Vietnam. Some historical questions could be raised from this source, like: * Why did the US get involved in Vietnam? * Why did America fear independence of South Vietnam? This source is an objective source as it shows both sides of the conflict, the US's and Vietnam's. It shows a lot of emotions of professor Noam Chomsky as he is trying to get his point of view across to other people. This source is quite reliable as it is objective and also quite true! This source is a very useful source to explain why the United States got involved in the Vietnam War. Conclusion: Sources A to C are quite important to explain why the united states got involved in the war in Vietnam as they show different reasons and point of views for the matter. Did the power of television force the United States to leave Vietnam? (Sources D to L) Source D: This source is a North Vietnamese poster produced and published during the war. It shows the problems faced by the Americans fighting a guerrilla war. This poster presents a particular point of view of how the Americans struggled to fight guerrilla fighters and how they found it difficult to bring in fresh supplies of ammunition and other necessaries. This poster is intended to influence Vietnamese people into thinking that the Americans are getting defeated and look confused. ...read more.


The people demonstrating are trying hard to get their message of anti-war across to higher authorities. Source J was published in a school textbook in 1970, after the end of the war. For this reason, the source would have had no influence on the war decisions, as it would have been over however it would have had a slight impact on the war decisions at the time of the war. Source J doesn't agree with the set question of Did the power of television force the United States to leave Vietnam? However it does show the commitment of the American public against the war. Source K: Source K is a public opinion poll asked in Australia during 1969-1970 (Australia fought alongside America in the war in Vietnam). The public were asked if they wanted their forces to continue fighting in Vietnam or be brought back home. I think the Australian government organized this type of poll so that they could find out public opinions on the war. The results of the poll would have probably been published in a newspaper. Source K is an Australian factual opinion. However it would have no impact on American decisions on the war. This source could have easily been tampered with so the results probably correspond well with the producer's opinion. The source shows that in 1970 50% of the voters wanted to bring their forces back home. This shows that there is a majority against the war, it also means that producer probably had a negative view on the war. Source K does not provide me with enough evidence to prove that the power of television forced to United States to leave Vietnam. Conclusion: The power of television did force the United States to leave Vietnam, but only to some extent. There are plenty of other factors for the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War. 1 Yasser Awad ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why America became increasingly involved in the affairs of Vietnam

    3 star(s)

    The United States wanted a more aggressive war against the communist in Honoi, not a 'softly softly' approach. Johnson's version of the domino theory was typically direct. 'If you let a bully come in to your front garden one day, the next day he will be up on your porch,

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    Source C also states that "our mission was not to win terrain, but simply to kill", this demonstrates the deterioration of tactics and suggests that US troops lacked tactics and motivation. The fact that their mission was to kill would have had a bad effect on the soldiers and they

  1. The Vietnam War – G.C.S.E. History Coursework

    However the bad points consist of the fact that the source only explains one of the views on this subject. Someone with the opposite opinion could have accused the kids of being evil and deliberately harmful to the American name etc.

  2. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    It could possibly be propaganda. (b) Reliability (3.3.1/3.3.2) SOURCE D Source D is taken from an American History book written in 1990, this means it might be being used to pass the message to future generations to know how it was like to fight in the Vietnam War.

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    In response to this the US sent military 'advisers' to fight the Viet Cong. The Americans knew that they could not destroy the Communists in the North politically as they had far too much support. The Viet Cong bullied peasants into helping them, and many Buddhists were angered over the

  2. The Vietnam War was a war of communism against Capitalism. The North of Vietnam ...

    The response that the soldiers reports got when they were shown were not very good. The US people could no understand how the soldiers were saying that such an awful event could be seen as a success. This event led to a large scale anti-war movement.

  1. Analysis of Vietnam Renunciation Speech - Lyndon B. Johnson General: ...

    The paragraph is rounded off by reaching out to the people and letting them know that the war is basically for their own safety and gain. The third paragraph is a very brief reference to America's allies and all other nations, where Lyndon Johnson assures them that America will stick to her promises and responsibilities.

  2. Why did the United States become involved in Vietnam in the 1950's and 1960's?

    This bombing campaign was to last for three and a half years and by 1967 the American airforce had dropped more bombs on North Vietnam than the Allies did on Germany in the whole Second World War. The first combat troops arrived in Vietnam on the 8th of March 1965 these were three and a half thousand US marines.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work