• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the Vietnam war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the Vietnam war? Source A: Source A is about US fear of communism. The nature of this source is a presidential speech to the US public. It is clear that source A is a primary source as it says on the bottom 'president Lyndon B Johnson speaking in April 1965.' That shows that the source is a primary one. There is a great possibility that the US presidential advisors produced this source to give president Lyndon B Johnson a speech to publish in front of the US public, one month after operation 'Rolling Thunder', which was a military operation, in which the US forces used massive fire power against North-Vietnamese forces. The aim and purpose of this source is to persuade the US public to back and understand the United States' violence in Vietnam, and to justify the president's actions in Vietnam to his nation. After the Second World War, France found it difficult to maintain control over indo-china. America supplied $1.2 billion of military aid to the French forces but in 1954, after a serious defeat in the battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French government decided to withdraw from Vietnam. At the Geneva conference, May 1954, it was agreed that elections would be held within two years and that in the meantime Vietnam would be divided into two halves with North Vietnam under the control of communist, Ho Chi Minh. These elections did not take place and the United States continued to supply military aid and advisors to help protect South Vietnam from communist guerrillas (national liberation front). On August 2nd 1964, North Vietnamese torpedo boats attacked the US destroyer Maddox. The United States government retaliated by bombing North Vietnamese naval bases and oil refineries. In March 1965, president Lyndon B Johnson started sending troops to South Vietnam to protect a government that appeared to be in danger of falling to the national liberation front. ...read more.

Middle

He believed that the United States did not want an independent South Vietnam that was no longer dominated by America. He also believed that the US feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself and develop its economy the US feared that because they wanted to dominate and control the south. This source contains information on what Noam Chomsky thought about the war in Vietnam. It shows what he believed on why the US got involved in the Vietnam War. It also shows that professor Noam Chomsky did not like the US's actions in Vietnam. Some historical questions could be raised from this source, like: * Why did the US get involved in Vietnam? * Why did America fear independence of South Vietnam? This source is an objective source as it shows both sides of the conflict, the US's and Vietnam's. It shows a lot of emotions of professor Noam Chomsky as he is trying to get his point of view across to other people. This source is quite reliable as it is objective and also quite true! This source is a very useful source to explain why the United States got involved in the Vietnam War. Conclusion: Sources A to C are quite important to explain why the united states got involved in the war in Vietnam as they show different reasons and point of views for the matter. Did the power of television force the United States to leave Vietnam? (Sources D to L) Source D: This source is a North Vietnamese poster produced and published during the war. It shows the problems faced by the Americans fighting a guerrilla war. This poster presents a particular point of view of how the Americans struggled to fight guerrilla fighters and how they found it difficult to bring in fresh supplies of ammunition and other necessaries. This poster is intended to influence Vietnamese people into thinking that the Americans are getting defeated and look confused. ...read more.

Conclusion

The people demonstrating are trying hard to get their message of anti-war across to higher authorities. Source J was published in a school textbook in 1970, after the end of the war. For this reason, the source would have had no influence on the war decisions, as it would have been over however it would have had a slight impact on the war decisions at the time of the war. Source J doesn't agree with the set question of Did the power of television force the United States to leave Vietnam? However it does show the commitment of the American public against the war. Source K: Source K is a public opinion poll asked in Australia during 1969-1970 (Australia fought alongside America in the war in Vietnam). The public were asked if they wanted their forces to continue fighting in Vietnam or be brought back home. I think the Australian government organized this type of poll so that they could find out public opinions on the war. The results of the poll would have probably been published in a newspaper. Source K is an Australian factual opinion. However it would have no impact on American decisions on the war. This source could have easily been tampered with so the results probably correspond well with the producer's opinion. The source shows that in 1970 50% of the voters wanted to bring their forces back home. This shows that there is a majority against the war, it also means that producer probably had a negative view on the war. Source K does not provide me with enough evidence to prove that the power of television forced to United States to leave Vietnam. Conclusion: The power of television did force the United States to leave Vietnam, but only to some extent. There are plenty of other factors for the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War. 1 Yasser Awad ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "What were the major factors that caused the United States to fail in the ...

    One of the most significant mistakes made by U.S. leadership during the conflict was the decision to wage limited war, or a low-intensity conflict. Such a strategy is characterized by limited action against the enemy as opposed to full, intense fighting. Rolling Thunder was an air campaign exemplifying limited war.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Although Stalin's immediate response was to declare that Poland was "not only a question of honor for Russia, but one of life and death," he finally agreed that some reorganization of the Lublin regime could take place to ensure broader representation of all Poles.

  1. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    This as the World Bank identifies, is the 'proximate cause of years of Palestinian economic distress'. The reason it is so destructive upon the economy is the fact that it eliminates the chance for the free flow of goods, whether imported or exported, as Israel effectively blockaded both of the enclaves, making them essentially open prisons.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    I will expand on these in detail when studying the sources. Firstly looking at source A we can see that it is a primary source because it is a public speech. What is more is that it is by the United States president Johnson who is speaking a month after operation rolling thunder.

  1. The Vietnam War had great political impact and led to deep division within Australian ...

    United States did come to rescue Australia in 1942 but the motive was for its self interest because Australia was the best place from which the Americans could apply its counter offenses against the Japanese, and when General MacArthur arrived in Australia he was greatly

  2. "Both 'The Deer Hunter' and 'Apocalypse Now' are less interested in capturing the historical ...

    Kurtz is a good example that, although choice and free-will are the building blocks of mankind, making the wrong choices can also corrupt mankind. 'Apocalypse Now', it is shown to us that absolute power corrupts absolutely. 'Apocalypse Now' gets across to its viewers how little the some of the American soldiers care about other human beings.

  1. The Vietnam War

    Eventually, he became a communist follower around 1917. 3 years later, he became a founder member of the French communist party, visiting Moscow to discover the heart of communism. He contacted his party, and told them to begin developing arms for 'the masses', with an aim to free and gain

  2. Why did the United States become so deeply involved in the Korean War in ...

    The Soviet Union became more generous to the North of Korea and with supplies of 87 T-34 tanks and 50,000 hardened veterans from China it became clear that the North had a huge military advantage. Within only a few days of fighting the Southern capital of Seoul fell.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work