• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam ?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam ? During World War Two Vietnam was occupied by the Japanese, until a strong anti-Japanese party moved in. This party was known as the Viet Minh and was lead by Ho Chi Minh who inspired people to fight for an independent country. At the ending of World War Two the Viet Minh had control of the North of Vietnam. Vietnam had been a French colony before World War Two and the French had returned wanting to control Vietnam in 1945,this is when the Vietnam War began. America and other countries felt sympathetic towards Viet Minh as it was seen as a war against the colonial rule of France but these countries were unaware that Ho Chi Mihn wanted a communists Vietnam. In 1949 communism took over China and this is when America realised Viet Minh`s plans for Vietnam. ...read more.


He also speaks his own opinion in this source. `What the hell is Vietnam worth to this country? `. The reasons stated from the involvement of the US are that `if you start running from the Communists then they may chase you into your own kitchen`. President Johnson believes that they should carry on fighting communism to protect Vietnam although Vietnam is a small country that isn't worth anything to them. If they keep to their agreement in the Truman Doctrine then this will prevent communism spreading to other countries. This source fits into my own knowledge of the Domino Theory. In 1954 Us President Eisenhower explained that if one country falls to communism then the numerous others will fall as well just like a line of dominoes. He believed if Vietnam fall then Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaya, Indonesia and Japan would fall too. ...read more.


In Source A President Johnson seems certain of the US involvement in the Vietnam War but in Source B he is unsure. Source A is also a justification of the war. However, Source C a biased opinion as Noam has an anti war perception and he suggests that resources are wrong. Source A and B state that America was defending the south and attacking the North but Noam Chomsky disagrees. The US government at the time of this source was a very distrusted government although he mirrors the view of the public. In conclusion to these sources think that Source B is the most reliable as President Johnson is speaking his own mind and it is around time of the war so this makes it a primary source. Although it does go against things said in Source A and C. The president doesn't seem sure of his involvement in the war but he knows not to go against a promise he has made to other countries which is the main reason that he carried on involvement in the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    This source might not be biased because it has been written by an American Journalist, whereas the information is from the Vietnamese, therefore it can possibly a balanced source. Overall I would say this source is fairly reliable. SOURCE G Source G has also been written by Seymor Hersh who wrote source F.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    Also as the war continued the USA's death toll increased. This meant that the USA had to increase involvement by sending in less trained troops and putting into effect offensives such as Rolling Thunder. In addition to this, the fact that the USA at first underestimated the Viet Cong meant

  1. Why Did the United States of America Become Involved In Vietnam?

    The fear of communism within Vietnam had applied the irrational involvement with Vietnam as a just cause in order to prevent the spread of communism. The context also gives us political reasoning where if the cause Americans was needed to fight the war in Vietnam at the time, here the

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Source A is useful because it gives the view of the American president at the time of the war (April 1965). To add to that, it is also useful as president Johnson explains the reasons why he became involved in the war in Vietnam.

  1. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    A totalitarian Communist regime also arose in Albania under Enver Hoxha, but without explicit Soviet assistance. In Asia, Soviet forces occupied Manchuria at the end of World War II, and then expanded military aid to allow the Communists under Mao Zedong to regain control over China during the final stages of the Chinese Civil War from 1946 to 1949.

  2. Vietnam Sources Questions

    skin, vegetation, wooden buildings) it would stick to the material and burn vigorously. It was used in bombs to destroy mainly villages and vegetation. In the short term Napalm was extremely effective and was widely used by the US.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam.

    the hands of the corrupt politicians of the handpicked South Vietnamese government. It was now that the Vietminh reacted by fighting against both the South Vietnamese and US government as North Vietnam verified that they wanted to conduct a war on the South in order to reunite Vietnam as one country.

  2. History Coursework - How useful are sources A, B and C in explaining why ...

    I believe it could be unreliable because in most cases speeches are not written by the speakers but by somebody who is specifically employed to do this. This means that what we are being told is not necessarily true as the messages being conveyed are probably not the presidents actual feelings.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work