• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam ?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam ? During World War Two Vietnam was occupied by the Japanese, until a strong anti-Japanese party moved in. This party was known as the Viet Minh and was lead by Ho Chi Minh who inspired people to fight for an independent country. At the ending of World War Two the Viet Minh had control of the North of Vietnam. Vietnam had been a French colony before World War Two and the French had returned wanting to control Vietnam in 1945,this is when the Vietnam War began. America and other countries felt sympathetic towards Viet Minh as it was seen as a war against the colonial rule of France but these countries were unaware that Ho Chi Mihn wanted a communists Vietnam. In 1949 communism took over China and this is when America realised Viet Minh`s plans for Vietnam. ...read more.


He also speaks his own opinion in this source. `What the hell is Vietnam worth to this country? `. The reasons stated from the involvement of the US are that `if you start running from the Communists then they may chase you into your own kitchen`. President Johnson believes that they should carry on fighting communism to protect Vietnam although Vietnam is a small country that isn't worth anything to them. If they keep to their agreement in the Truman Doctrine then this will prevent communism spreading to other countries. This source fits into my own knowledge of the Domino Theory. In 1954 Us President Eisenhower explained that if one country falls to communism then the numerous others will fall as well just like a line of dominoes. He believed if Vietnam fall then Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaya, Indonesia and Japan would fall too. ...read more.


In Source A President Johnson seems certain of the US involvement in the Vietnam War but in Source B he is unsure. Source A is also a justification of the war. However, Source C a biased opinion as Noam has an anti war perception and he suggests that resources are wrong. Source A and B state that America was defending the south and attacking the North but Noam Chomsky disagrees. The US government at the time of this source was a very distrusted government although he mirrors the view of the public. In conclusion to these sources think that Source B is the most reliable as President Johnson is speaking his own mind and it is around time of the war so this makes it a primary source. Although it does go against things said in Source A and C. The president doesn't seem sure of his involvement in the war but he knows not to go against a promise he has made to other countries which is the main reason that he carried on involvement in the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    Another serious blow to the US credibility came with the exposure of the My Lai massacre (March 1968). Hushed up at the time and only discovered by a tenacious journalist, this involved the killing of 400 men, women and children by US troops.

  2. Why Did the United States of America Become Involved In Vietnam?

    long to wait, he suggested a strategy that would be less unpopular with the American public as it would result in fewer of the men being killed. The lution of the U.S. Congress. It is of historical significance because it gave US President approval, without a formal declaration of war,

  1. Vietnam coursework essay 1 - How Useful are Sources A to C to explain ...

    This makes it less likely that he would be trying to hide facts. Also it was a year before the war started so he is not under as much pressure to talk it up, and as you can see from the source, he actually wants to try and get out of getting in to a war.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Source A is useful because it gives the view of the American president at the time of the war (April 1965). To add to that, it is also useful as president Johnson explains the reasons why he became involved in the war in Vietnam.

  1. World War One Sources Questions

    Although the Kaiser is mentioned briefly. The director of this source, has only concentrated on the German soldiers feeling towards the war when in fact it is most probable that the German soldiers views would have been the same as their French and British counter parts.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Some PLO accounts describe the passengers as civilians and other reports as guerrilla trainees. However, the Phalangist version was confirmed by Abd al-Rahim Ahmad of the Palestinian ALF who stated in an interview in Amman, 28th December 1986, that those on the bus were indeed armed Palestinian ALF members.

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    I will expand on these in detail when studying the sources. Firstly looking at source A we can see that it is a primary source because it is a public speech. What is more is that it is by the United States president Johnson who is speaking a month after operation rolling thunder.

  2. History Coursework - How useful are sources A, B and C in explaining why ...

    As what Noam Chomsky says is spoken after the war we can believe that this source is truthful. I believe this because with it being post-war he would have a much wider range of sources coming from different people. This also means that he is most-likely to have studied sources

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work