• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam? All 3 sources give different point of view on why America entered the war in Vietnam and they all have value, however there are limitations as well. Together they help us to explain why America got involved in the war. Source A is an extract of a speech made by President Johnson a month after Operation Rolling Thunder therefore it is a contemporary source. Because of this, the source is more than likely to be bias as Johnson has already made his decision about Vietnam therefore he is going to be defending that decision. Johnson is addressing the public thus the speech becomes rhetoric and persuasive. This is a limitation and does not provide accurate understanding. Johnson is speaking to defend his actions and this is clear from the content of the source. He talks about an 'Even wider war' which links in with the domino theory and the spread of communism to neighbouring countries of Vietnam. We know that free elections were not allowed in South Vietnam however Johnson says one of their objectives was 'freedom of the people,' this was clearly not one of them. ...read more.

Middle

President Johnson doesn't mention why he wants to 'contain' Communism and why he does not like this system, which is partly because it means that the country cannot be as productive. In addition, he does not mention the Truman Doctrine or what his opinions are on it when he explains the only reasons they should go into war. This makes it less useful because historians will not be able to see whether Johnson thought it was worth sending supplies into Vietnam, because from what he says, he does not appear to think that Vietnam is a worthwhile country to get involved with. Johnson does not explain how he would feel about going into war against Vietnam if the Vietnamese caused a threat to America, other than the spread of Communism, like they did in the Gulf of Tonkin. Therefore, historians cannot justify whether he is saying Vietnam is not worth fighting for because they have been no real threat to America yet and whether he would actually change his mind if they became a threat. Johnson does not comment on why the public and politicians agree to get involved in Vietnam, which makes this statement less reliable because there is no evidence to back up this point. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, historians don't know what he is a professor of, and he could be a Professor of Science for example. Therefore he may not have studied the war in great depth, which makes the source slightly less trustworthy, and many US intellectuals were opposed to the war anyway so this source will not be as useful, as he will be making the same points as a lot of other US intellectuals. The source is trustworthy because Chomsky would have had access to more sources due to the interview being after the war. He will have been able to look at sources like a private conversation President Johnson was having, as well as photos of the destruction that was caused to South Vietnam. However Chomsky is anti-war and is known to be an extreme radical. Chomsky refers to these sources as being 'official' and includes quotes around the word, which might suggest they are not. Nevertheless there is same justification in believing that the USA were not just defending the South Vietnamese against communism but protecting its own interests in the Far East. Chomsky states 'The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam.' This is justified by the fact that South Vietnam did not have free elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How the United States become involved in the war in Vietnam.

    Also he wouldn't mention his true feeling on the war in case it jeopardised support towards his presidency and elections. This speech was aimed to get support for Operation Thunder and the war effort in Vietnam, not to bring the nation down or to create fear.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    It is not meant to inform and give facts it is meant to boost morale. This does not make the source useful in the aspects of telling us directly but it may suggest other things to us. The source is reliable as it is a public speech and is unlikely to be tampered with.

  1. Explain Why The United States Became Increasingly Involved In The War In Vietnam

    This bombing was given the name 'Operation Rolling Thunder'. In conclusion, we can link all the events to each other. America would not have been scared of Vietnam becoming communist if it wasn't for the fact that China was such a big country and communism could easily spread from there all across Asia and Europe.

  2. History Coursework - How useful are sources A, B and C in explaining why ...

    His speech comes across as extremely one-sided and only stresses what the effects of not going to war are. Source B is part of a private conversation that President Johnson was having with an unknown person in May of 1964.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in Vietnam

    were no casualties but one might believe that later he realised that it was time to gain revenge and destroy his label as being soft on communism. To conclude, a unanimous but expected decision was made by President Johnson, he decided to go to war with the communist forces of

  2. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam.

    Indochina was split up to form the communist North and non-communist South Vietnam, as well as Laos and Cambodia. The division of the North and South of Vietnam was a demilitarised area at the 17th parallel, with the North being controlled by Ho Chi Minh's communist government and the South being provided with a US-picked anti-Communist government.

  1. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    This communist victory over the French led the Americans to believe that communists were taking over the world and must be stopped. Sources A to C show two people's views towards America going into war against North Vietnam and the Viet Cong.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This source agrees with my own knowledge of the My Lai Massacre. The My Lai massacre was a massacre of Vietnamese civilians by U.S. soldiers. On March 16, 1968, a unit of the US army Americal division, led by Lt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work