• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam? All 3 sources give different point of view on why America entered the war in Vietnam and they all have value, however there are limitations as well. Together they help us to explain why America got involved in the war. Source A is an extract of a speech made by President Johnson a month after Operation Rolling Thunder therefore it is a contemporary source. Because of this, the source is more than likely to be bias as Johnson has already made his decision about Vietnam therefore he is going to be defending that decision. Johnson is addressing the public thus the speech becomes rhetoric and persuasive. This is a limitation and does not provide accurate understanding. Johnson is speaking to defend his actions and this is clear from the content of the source. He talks about an 'Even wider war' which links in with the domino theory and the spread of communism to neighbouring countries of Vietnam. We know that free elections were not allowed in South Vietnam however Johnson says one of their objectives was 'freedom of the people,' this was clearly not one of them. ...read more.

Middle

President Johnson doesn't mention why he wants to 'contain' Communism and why he does not like this system, which is partly because it means that the country cannot be as productive. In addition, he does not mention the Truman Doctrine or what his opinions are on it when he explains the only reasons they should go into war. This makes it less useful because historians will not be able to see whether Johnson thought it was worth sending supplies into Vietnam, because from what he says, he does not appear to think that Vietnam is a worthwhile country to get involved with. Johnson does not explain how he would feel about going into war against Vietnam if the Vietnamese caused a threat to America, other than the spread of Communism, like they did in the Gulf of Tonkin. Therefore, historians cannot justify whether he is saying Vietnam is not worth fighting for because they have been no real threat to America yet and whether he would actually change his mind if they became a threat. Johnson does not comment on why the public and politicians agree to get involved in Vietnam, which makes this statement less reliable because there is no evidence to back up this point. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, historians don't know what he is a professor of, and he could be a Professor of Science for example. Therefore he may not have studied the war in great depth, which makes the source slightly less trustworthy, and many US intellectuals were opposed to the war anyway so this source will not be as useful, as he will be making the same points as a lot of other US intellectuals. The source is trustworthy because Chomsky would have had access to more sources due to the interview being after the war. He will have been able to look at sources like a private conversation President Johnson was having, as well as photos of the destruction that was caused to South Vietnam. However Chomsky is anti-war and is known to be an extreme radical. Chomsky refers to these sources as being 'official' and includes quotes around the word, which might suggest they are not. Nevertheless there is same justification in believing that the USA were not just defending the South Vietnamese against communism but protecting its own interests in the Far East. Chomsky states 'The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam.' This is justified by the fact that South Vietnam did not have free elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    Looking at source B we can see that it is a primary source. It is President Johnson speaking in a private conversation in May 1964. Taking these two into account I do not think this will be a bias source because the president is not putting on an impression as he was in source A.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    In 1971 more revelations about the war strengthened the growing opposition movement. One concerned details of a policy of assassination and torture carried out by the South Vietnamese under American supervision. The second development which seriously damaged the reputation of the United States in 1971 was the 'Pentagon Papers'.

  1. Why Did the United States of America Become Involved In Vietnam?

    own research, first of all about this speech in source A, as this speech is an extract and some of the information is partially reliable to us. I could search via the internet for the whole of the President Johnson's speech.

  2. Vietnam coursework essay 1 - How Useful are Sources A to C to explain ...

    There are also other reasons that he mentions, the domino theory and the containment policy are both mentioned and the source also shows that the Americans were scared of communism.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    to glorify the war, as it was him who sent troops into the war and is going to be strong in front of the public as any uncertainties would put doubt into the mind of the public and turn the public against him.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A states that the United States soldiers were too inexperienced to be fighting against the Viet Cong guerrilla soldiers who were fighting on their own grounds, which they knew extremely well.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    Kennedy decided that Diem was too unpopular to beat the Vietcong and the Communist threat in Vietnam. Diem was assassinated on the 1st November 1963; however the new Government wanted all foreign troops to leave South Vietnam which annoyed the Americans who had pumped over $400,000,000 into the country.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Political parties would remain an integral part of the American system of government. During the 1790s, however, foreign affairs became dominant, and dreams of republican simplicity and quietude were dashed. A long series of wars between Britain and Revolutionary France began in that decade, and the Americans were inevitably pulled into the fray.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work