• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam? All 3 sources give different point of view on why America entered the war in Vietnam and they all have value, however there are limitations as well. Together they help us to explain why America got involved in the war. Source A is an extract of a speech made by President Johnson a month after Operation Rolling Thunder therefore it is a contemporary source. Because of this, the source is more than likely to be bias as Johnson has already made his decision about Vietnam therefore he is going to be defending that decision. Johnson is addressing the public thus the speech becomes rhetoric and persuasive. This is a limitation and does not provide accurate understanding. Johnson is speaking to defend his actions and this is clear from the content of the source. He talks about an 'Even wider war' which links in with the domino theory and the spread of communism to neighbouring countries of Vietnam. We know that free elections were not allowed in South Vietnam however Johnson says one of their objectives was 'freedom of the people,' this was clearly not one of them. ...read more.

Middle

President Johnson doesn't mention why he wants to 'contain' Communism and why he does not like this system, which is partly because it means that the country cannot be as productive. In addition, he does not mention the Truman Doctrine or what his opinions are on it when he explains the only reasons they should go into war. This makes it less useful because historians will not be able to see whether Johnson thought it was worth sending supplies into Vietnam, because from what he says, he does not appear to think that Vietnam is a worthwhile country to get involved with. Johnson does not explain how he would feel about going into war against Vietnam if the Vietnamese caused a threat to America, other than the spread of Communism, like they did in the Gulf of Tonkin. Therefore, historians cannot justify whether he is saying Vietnam is not worth fighting for because they have been no real threat to America yet and whether he would actually change his mind if they became a threat. Johnson does not comment on why the public and politicians agree to get involved in Vietnam, which makes this statement less reliable because there is no evidence to back up this point. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, historians don't know what he is a professor of, and he could be a Professor of Science for example. Therefore he may not have studied the war in great depth, which makes the source slightly less trustworthy, and many US intellectuals were opposed to the war anyway so this source will not be as useful, as he will be making the same points as a lot of other US intellectuals. The source is trustworthy because Chomsky would have had access to more sources due to the interview being after the war. He will have been able to look at sources like a private conversation President Johnson was having, as well as photos of the destruction that was caused to South Vietnam. However Chomsky is anti-war and is known to be an extreme radical. Chomsky refers to these sources as being 'official' and includes quotes around the word, which might suggest they are not. Nevertheless there is same justification in believing that the USA were not just defending the South Vietnamese against communism but protecting its own interests in the Far East. Chomsky states 'The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam.' This is justified by the fact that South Vietnam did not have free elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    It is not meant to inform and give facts it is meant to boost morale. This does not make the source useful in the aspects of telling us directly but it may suggest other things to us. The source is reliable as it is a public speech and is unlikely to be tampered with.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    and October 1970 the majority of the public who wanted troops to return had decreased. This source agrees with my own knowledge of TV of losing the US the war. The Australians sent troops as they feared the domino theory, as if it carried on spreading across Asia, it would soon hit them.

  1. Why Did the United States of America Become Involved In Vietnam?

    President Johnson becomes biased reciting a verse from the bible, where at that day and age the population was protestant. "Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further......" The historical question this extract might help me to answer is that the Americans wanted communism out of Vietnam, and they did not want the domino theory to take its toll.

  2. Vietnam coursework essay 1 - How Useful are Sources A to C to explain ...

    There are also other reasons that he mentions, the domino theory and the containment policy are both mentioned and the source also shows that the Americans were scared of communism.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    However, the source also has its limitations, as the speech was spoken by President Johnson and so is going to be biased in order to get all of the American public to support his ideas. President Johnson is talking to the public and as a result of this is going

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    The USA constantly bombed this area but it was to no avail. Thousands of communist workers worked constantly to keep it open ensuring the Viet Cong were well supplied. The USA dropped more bombs in North Vietnam during this period than what was dropped in Germany during the Second World War.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    Diem also used a strategic hamlet program to help protect villages from the Vietcong. Peasants from miles around would be placed in selected fortified villages. This proved to be costly and unpopular with his own people. Diem also favored Catholics over the majority Buddhist population, which led to big problems.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    The established social and political elite (as distinct from the rough new antiauthoritarian politicians who had begun to invade the state legislatures, talking aggressively of "democracy" and "liberty") urgently asserted the need for a strong national government. The influence that the London authorities had formerly provided as a balance to local government was absent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work