• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam? All 3 sources give different point of view on why America entered the war in Vietnam and they all have value, however there are limitations as well. Together they help us to explain why America got involved in the war. Source A is an extract of a speech made by President Johnson a month after Operation Rolling Thunder therefore it is a contemporary source. Because of this, the source is more than likely to be bias as Johnson has already made his decision about Vietnam therefore he is going to be defending that decision. Johnson is addressing the public thus the speech becomes rhetoric and persuasive. This is a limitation and does not provide accurate understanding. Johnson is speaking to defend his actions and this is clear from the content of the source. He talks about an 'Even wider war' which links in with the domino theory and the spread of communism to neighbouring countries of Vietnam. We know that free elections were not allowed in South Vietnam however Johnson says one of their objectives was 'freedom of the people,' this was clearly not one of them. ...read more.

Middle

President Johnson doesn't mention why he wants to 'contain' Communism and why he does not like this system, which is partly because it means that the country cannot be as productive. In addition, he does not mention the Truman Doctrine or what his opinions are on it when he explains the only reasons they should go into war. This makes it less useful because historians will not be able to see whether Johnson thought it was worth sending supplies into Vietnam, because from what he says, he does not appear to think that Vietnam is a worthwhile country to get involved with. Johnson does not explain how he would feel about going into war against Vietnam if the Vietnamese caused a threat to America, other than the spread of Communism, like they did in the Gulf of Tonkin. Therefore, historians cannot justify whether he is saying Vietnam is not worth fighting for because they have been no real threat to America yet and whether he would actually change his mind if they became a threat. Johnson does not comment on why the public and politicians agree to get involved in Vietnam, which makes this statement less reliable because there is no evidence to back up this point. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, historians don't know what he is a professor of, and he could be a Professor of Science for example. Therefore he may not have studied the war in great depth, which makes the source slightly less trustworthy, and many US intellectuals were opposed to the war anyway so this source will not be as useful, as he will be making the same points as a lot of other US intellectuals. The source is trustworthy because Chomsky would have had access to more sources due to the interview being after the war. He will have been able to look at sources like a private conversation President Johnson was having, as well as photos of the destruction that was caused to South Vietnam. However Chomsky is anti-war and is known to be an extreme radical. Chomsky refers to these sources as being 'official' and includes quotes around the word, which might suggest they are not. Nevertheless there is same justification in believing that the USA were not just defending the South Vietnamese against communism but protecting its own interests in the Far East. Chomsky states 'The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam.' This is justified by the fact that South Vietnam did not have free elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    Looking at source B we can see that it is a primary source. It is President Johnson speaking in a private conversation in May 1964. Taking these two into account I do not think this will be a bias source because the president is not putting on an impression as he was in source A.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    Overall this source does not agree with the statement that television was an important reason to why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. Another factor why the United States lost the war in Vietnam is because of the media and in particular media in 1971.

  1. Why Did the United States of America Become Involved In Vietnam?

    I could also study from books from the library about the speech and the general study of the Vietnam War. The speech we have studied is biased, as the speech is a one sided story sticking to one subject, another form fro m this speech becoming biased is where at

  2. Vietnam coursework essay 1 - How Useful are Sources A to C to explain ...

    The source is also very revealing about what Johnson really thought about Vietnam. He says "I don't think it's worth fighting for" which is something he wouldn't have said in public or maybe Johnson has just not made his mind up about the war yet.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    to glorify the war, as it was him who sent troops into the war and is going to be strong in front of the public as any uncertainties would put doubt into the mind of the public and turn the public against him.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    Therefore the percentage of soldiers not smart enough may only have risen by 1% or even a fraction of that. However from 1962 to 1969 the amount of United States soldiers rose from well under 100,000 to more than 500,000.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    They gave him four choices: 1. Negotiate a settlement with the North 2. Send in the Marines 3. Continue maintaining a force of advisors in Vietnam 4. Leave Vietnam and let the dominoes fall At first he chose to continue sending advisors to train their armed forces, but by May

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Economic and Cultural Ferment After 1815 the American economy began to expand rapidly. The cotton boom in the South spread settlement swiftly across the Gulf Plains: the Deep South was born. Farmers also moved into the Lake Plains north of the Ohio River, their migration greatly accelerating after the completion of the ERIE CANAL in 1825.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work