• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are these 2 sources as evidence for the contribution of women to the war effort in the years 1914-1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

4. Study sources F and G. How useful are these 2 sources as evidence for the contribution of women to the war effort in the years 1914-1918? Source F, a poster produced by the government in 1916, encourages women to become munition workers for the First World War. It is useful in many ways; it shows that women were patriotic and capable of doing jobs that were not necessarily the stereotypical jobs for them at that time. It shows both sexes working alongside each other. The poster was created during the First World War so the designer knew the situation. It shows that women were a massive aid to the war effort as without the ammunition that they provided, the men might not be able to fight, therefore may have lost the war and England may have been taken over by the Germans. ...read more.

Middle

Many of these women, known as 'canaries', died as a result of this. Source F is of limited use as evidence for the contribution to the war effort as it is only one poster so information and knowledge of the situation is limited. It only shows one aspect of women's work and does not mention other jobs they did such as blacksmiths, gravediggers, bus conductors, agricultural workers and factory workers. It is propaganda by the government encouraging women to enrol. It is biased and hypocritical of the government as they had said women were not competent enough to work. Its sole purpose was to get women into the workforce for the war while the men were at the front fighting and dying. ...read more.

Conclusion

The way this source was compiled shows how women contributed to the war effort hugely and that they participated in areas they hadn't explored previously such as weapon production. It shows in effect that propaganda such as source F had worked. Source G is not as useful as evidence for the contribution of women to the war effort for many reasons. It does not state how many women were available to work in that country in either period. Figures are needed before and after showing if there was a real change of attitude to women. The war gave women a chance to prove they were perfectly capable of doing men's jobs but neither source actually shows a real change of attitude by the government towards equality, work and voting rights of women. It seems as though the women are being used. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * 700,000 veterans have suffered from psychological disorders since returning to the USA. * More veterans have committed suicide than were killed in the fighting. What happened after the US forces withdrew? * Negotiations between the USA and the North Vietnamese dragged on for five years.

  2. How significant was the contribution of women to Britain's War effort

    By 1943 87,000 were playing an active part in the war effort on the home front. Another area where women's contribution to Britain's war effort was very significant was the Auxiliary Services which compromised of three sectors. The Auxiliary Territorial Services (ATS), Women's Royal Navy Service (WRNS)

  1. Free essay

    Study Sources F and G.How useful are these two sources as evidence for the ...

    It is also limited because it has no indication as to whether women played roles in the war I other areas, besides munitions. In addition, the source is limited because it states neither the wages, nor the risks of the job of munition workers.

  2. Propaganda, Recruitment and ResistanceThe Home Front 1914-1918

    Deterring the enemy off the war was a focal point of lowering the morale of the German public.

  1. The Home Front 1914-1918, Women and work - source related study.

    Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B? 2. Source C is part of a book written by a factory owner in Birmingham it was produced in 1917. It tells us the factors of why woman prefer factory life such as freedom, independence and earning money.

  2. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    The factory owner writes that 'The children...are better off than before,' well no family could be better of if they are earning 15 shillings a week unless they were unemployed before. The factory owner also writes that ' They like the freedom,' but if you are 'expected' to work overtime

  1. Women and the war effort in Britain, 1914-1918'

    Thus, with all taken into account, we can say that both have their uses, one reliable as a personal source, and the other as a general one. 3. Source D is an extract written by Rex Pope in 1991, almost eighty years after the First World War.

  2. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    (ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATION/INTERPRETATION, RELIABILITY) Source K is a video showing how the dropping of the atomic bombs were represented in the years following 1945. The power that the world had seemingly achieved was portrayed as a giant leap forward in technology and the art of warfare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work