• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful certain sources are as evidence to the public reaction of the USA to the Vietnam War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chanelle Gray Question 4 The Vietnam War was very important, as it was the first war to be covered by the media on TV. The question is asking us how useful certain sources are as evidence to the public reaction of the USA to the Vietnam War. Source G is an article from a US magazine, which was published at the time. It is a primary source. But the problem is, the magazine was designed to entertain, not necessarily to tell the truth. The first word of the source is "Television". This is referring to the TV war theory. It also says that TV has encouraged a majority of viewers to support the war. This source includes figures in it. 64% people said TV made them feel they wanted to back up the boys and 26% felt opposed to the war. Now if we take a look at the source closely and ask some questions about it, we'll find out how useful this source is to find out how the public felt about then war. ...read more.

Middle

It doesn't mention what people said what and what age group they were in etc. The source was based on results from Gallup poll results but doesn't say what that is. It also doesn't mention how the votes were collected. If it were from a magazine, only some people would vote because not everyone reads magazines. If it were a TV vote, not many people would send in votes either. It is quite relevant because it mentions how that Vietnam was thought of the most important problem for around 3 years. It's also included the dates the Chanelle Gray Question has asked about and has said what was important then. I think we can trust it more than the previous source, but I wouldn't use it to find out information to write in a history book about Vietnam. There just isn't the right amount of information involved. Source I is a letter written by a US soldier fighting in the Vietnam War. It was written at the time. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was also a picture, which we don't get to see. There is quite a bit of information in this source, but as with the others, there are no figures and it doesn't mention how many people there were in the group of kids. I think that this source would probably be one of those sources, which makes the public oppose the war. The US was supposed to be protecting the innocent, not killing them. It has speech in it about what was said and it had a picture but it isn't actually shown in this booklet. I think that the source, which shows how the public reacted most to the war, is source H. I think this because the dates go with the dates the question mentions and also was a Poll that was taken. People thought that Vietnam was the biggest problem. I don't think the sources were very useful to the question because they miss out a lot of detail. I think that sources, which includes pictures or graphs, would be better to show how the US people felt about the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    There have been many...it was common to bring up Pearl Harbor but that's not a good analogy. The Japanese, whatever you think about it, the Japanese bombed military bases in 2 US colonies not the national territory; colonies which had been taken from their inhabitants in not a very pretty way.

  2. Why did the USA send troops into Vietnam

    To eradicate Communism, the USA had to focus nearer home, they imposed the same restrictions on the many 'home grown' Communists. Over 3million Americans were investigated for their political beliefs, Hollywood writers and actors were investigated as they appeared to show Communist sympathies in their acting and writing.

  1. American History.

    The Virginia Company was a joint-stock venture [it was funded by contributions from many small investors]. - Although joint-stock companies had worked well to finance voyages, which quickly resulted in $, they wouldn't work as well for colonies b/c colonies required enormous amounts of funding and usually failed, or at least took a long time, to return profits.

  2. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    (ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATION/INTERPRETATION, RELIABILITY) Source K is a video showing how the dropping of the atomic bombs were represented in the years following 1945. The power that the world had seemingly achieved was portrayed as a giant leap forward in technology and the art of warfare.

  1. American Public Opinion During Vietnam.

    Wounded soldiers and veterans came home with stories of how they were encouraged to kill anything that moved. Returning soldiers were not given the hero's welcome, far from it, in fact, especially towards the end of the war they were generally shunned by the American Public.

  2. American Public Opinion during Vietnam.

    The reality was that it all lasted for far too long. As the body bags mounted up the Americans started to question their involvement. Wounded soldiers and veterans came home with stories of how they were encouraged to kill anything that moved.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    With Swiss made tunnel borers he carved out miles of tunnels and loaded them with rockets, ammunition, explosives, missiles, bombs and more. They also found extensive documentation detailing plans for a full scale invasion of Israel. The PLO along with the surrounding Arab states would commit their full armed forces to a future invasion.

  2. How useful are sources A-C for explaining why the U.S.A became involved in the ...

    This meant that they want him to go straight for the communists themselves and to stop attempting to train up the south. But perhaps, he is worried about what he's about to do in the Gulf of Ton Kin, not the congress breathing down his neck.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work