• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful is the 'Fischer Thesis' in helping to explain the origins of the First World War? Fischer's Thesis was thought to be controversial due to the much-accepted Lloyd George's theory to why World War One happened

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ross Dewhurst- Cartmel College How useful is the 'Fischer Thesis' in helping to explain the origins of the First World War? Fischer's Thesis was thought to be controversial due to the much-accepted Lloyd George's theory to why World War One happened. George's theory was that power more or less took Germany into starting World War One. But with Fischer going against George's theory it brought much controversy from older historians as they had accepted his theory. But Fischer did get backing by some historians into believing that his thesis was correct. Fischer's thesis is that Germany wanted to seek power on a par with countries that were strong in Europe. Fischer said that he believed Germany would try to seek this power with or without force, i.e. war. Fischer conceded that German leaders thought the only way to get this European dominance was to have a European war to achieve this. Fischer stated in his thesis that he believed that his theory about the German leaders long existed before World War One actually began. ...read more.

Middle

My next reason as to why I agree with Fischer's thesis is due to the fact he states that Germany had planned this long before the war began. I agree with this as I think that Germany, as stated earlier wanted the power of the likes of France but knew they couldn't attain this from them. So from them knowing this (Germans) I agree with Fischer that they planned this attack before they actually decided to go to war. My final reason why I agree with Fischer's thesis is that he states that the Germans were trying to make the British think they had been provoked by the French. I agree with this as the Germans held the British as a major super-power in Europe and a threat if they went against them in the war. By trying to make the British think the French started World War One instead of Austria they would join sides with the Germans and share the power that they had. ...read more.

Conclusion

Ritter criticised this immensely saying that how could there be similar plans between the two Reich's even though they were both similar to Nazi policies. The Germans thought that the surrounding countries, which it wished to gain control over, i.e. France and Russia, encircled them causing the Schlieffen Plan to be created. This plan was made in order take France out in the first six weeks of the war before Russia had time to react to this, as France and Russia were strong allies. With Germany hoping to do this it would enable them not to fight the war on two fronts being that if a European War came about they would have an easier chance of winning it. This plan failed when it came into action due to several troops being absent from the western front of field causing poor communication among troops allowing the French to locate their position. To conclude I agree strongly with the Fischer's Thesis in regarding to how World War One started, but it does have several weak points as outlined in this essay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The war might have been won however the British and French lost a lot more soldiers than the Germans. During the battle the British lost a total of 600,000 men and the French lost 200,000, whilst the German losses were 500,000; only 12 km was gained by this attack.

  2. In what way was World War 2 due to the failure of the victors ...

    etc. The imperialism continued after World War 1, in 1923, Mussolini bombarded Corfu, Southern part of Greece and in 1938; he conquered Abyssinia which worsened the relationship with Britain. In 1938, Hitler annexed whole of Czech, which cast a deep shadow all over Europe.

  1. What is "Total War"? Discuss with reference to World War One and World War ...

    In World War Two there was ground war as well as air war and sea war. The aim of most of the countries was to destroy the industries of the "enemy"; this was done by killing the workforce, bombing their houses for example.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Tactically, the Marines were charged with occupying and securing positions along a line from the airport east to the Presidential Palace at Babda. The intent was to separate the IDF from the population of Beirut. The key to the initial success of MNF II was its neutrality.

  1. 'Germany started the First World War

    However, Fischer instead believed that the inclusion of Germany in the War was due to 'Primat der Innenpolitik' or 'primacy of domestic policy', which entails that the German foreign policy was dictated by internal political goals. In his argument, he claims that the German elite and government were in favour

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    Once again, there is no evidence of an aggressive move by Germany in this source. However, her reasons for entering the war, according to Wilhelm II have been given here. 'England...has been seeking to annihilate us'. This source does not support the idea of an aggressive German foreign policy.

  1. Must a defensible theory of the morality of war must integrate moral reasoning with ...

    institutional theory through such institutions as the UN, ICJ and a variety of Conventions under international law, but for the greater understanding, just war theory remains a moral theory almost without any institutional support at all. This has created a widespread debate on whether or not just war theory should

  2. The First World War

    To summarize, the main objectives of the Schlieffen plan were to make France surrender by capturing all the channel ports and then by capturing Paris. This would mean there would be a war on just one front rather than two.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work