• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful is the Marxist concept of imperialism to our understanding of contemporary international relations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful is the Marxist concept of imperialism to our understanding of contemporary international relations? Curiously enough, most of the clues to the Marxist theory of imperialism in this century were provided by the English economist John A. Hobson (1858-1940). Hobson argued that imperialism results from maladjustments within the capitalist system, in which wealthy minority oversaves while an impoverished or 'bare substitute' majority lacks the buying power to consume the goods of modern industry. Capitalists are therefore faced with the problem of over-production and under-consumption. If capitalists were willing to redistribute their surplus wealth in the form of domestic welfare measures, there would be no serious structural problem. The capitalists, however, seek to reinvest their surplus wealth by seeking foreign profit-making ventures abroad1. The result is imperialism, 'the endeavour of the great controllers of industry to broaden the channel for the flow of their surplus wealth by seeking foreign markets and foreign investments to take off the goods and capital they cannot sell or use at home.2' Hobson's view on imperialism was the basis for the Marxist concepts, and a huge influence of Lenin. The best-known theorist of imperialism in modern times was Lenin. The architect of the Bolshevik Revolution was neither the scholar nor the original thinker that Hobson was. ...read more.

Middle

Moreover, the greater the development of capitalism, the greater the need for raw materials and markets, and hence the greater scramble for colonies. The establishment of political control over territories overseas is designed to provide a dependable source of raw materials and cheap labour and to guarantee markets for the industrial combines of advanced capitalist countries.7 Lenin held that imperialist policies would enable capitalist powers to stave off the inevitable revolution, since conditions of the domestic proletariat would be improved by the exploitation of the working class in colonial territories. Writing in the spring of 1916, nearly two years after the outbreak of World War I (WWI), Lenin viewed the history of the previous generation as a struggle between the advanced capitalist powers for the control of colonies and markets. Capitalist countries have formed alliances for the exploitation of the underdeveloped areas. Especially in East Asia and Africa, the imperialistic powers have claimed territories and areas of influence. Such alliances are, however, breathing spells between wars, since the capitalist powers find it necessary to fight for control of limited overseas markets and raw materials. Because of the ultimate dependence of capitalist economic systems upon such markets and natural resources, international conflict is endemic in a world of capitalist states. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Andropov-Chernenko interregnum (1982-1985) was a transitional period of unstable leadership without precedent in Soviet history. From 1985 until the collapse of the Soviet union, the Gorbachev gave rise to a spirited debate throughout the West, before the collapse, as to whether glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) are harbingers of fundamental change in the Soviet world outlook, change that would so transform Lenin's ideological-political heritage as to be tantamount to abandoning it.10 The major critique of any Marxist concept, when applying them to contemporary international relations is the fact that the vast majority of Communist nations have fallen. Granted, communism was not totally based on Marxist theory, however it was its backbone. In conclusion, the Marxist concept of imperialism is partially usefull to our understanding of contemporary international relations in terms of a theory. All theories of international relations can cite examples from issues which arise in world affairs, equally, critics can cite examples where the reverse has occurred. The fall of the Soviet Union and other Communist regimes dispelled many of the Marxist views. One of the major critiques of the Marxist view is the fact that Lenin stated that imperialism was the highest form of capitalism. This view does not explain why a communist state, the Soviet Union, had Eastern European colonies of its own. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. British Imperialism in India.

    The emperor gave permission to the British and with this the first stage of imperialism started, the sphere of influence. The East India Company set up trading posts all throughout Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and other cities. The French and other countries were setting up trading posts as well in India but Britain was the most powerful in India.

  2. Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

    Sun Tzu felt that war was not about bloodshed - instead he felt that: "all warfare is based on deception..."11 Michael Handle wrote that "Sun Tzu devotes considerable attention to the actions that precede war... for him diplomacy is the best means of achieving his ideal of victory without fighting

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    o the Soviet Red Army was now occupying most of Eastern Europe o Stalin was trying to force in a Communist government in Poland What was agreed to at Potsdam? * Germany and Austria were divided as agreed at Yalta.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    As historians Martin Sherwin and Barton Bernstein have shown, the momentum behind the Manhattan Project was such that no one ever debated the underlying assumption that, once perfected, nuclear weapons would be used.

  1. American History.

    plantations New England mainly consisted of small towns. Family life - In the Chesapeake, the predominance of males, the high? mortality rate, and the incidence of servitude led to few, small, short-lived families. In New England, by contrast, people moved to the colonies already in family units and there was

  2. Examine the main premises behind Eisenhower's concept of containment

    the West to nurture the already growing signs of unrest in the Eastern bloc, not to incite premature revolt.19 Dulles stated that to aggressively detach Soviet satellite states from the USSR would almost certainly risk general war that it wouldn't deal with the root of the problem that of Soviet unimpaired nuclear capability.

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    Although he agreed to this at first, Mao became alarmed at the hostility with which the populace received this evidence of Soviet control. As Stalin brought in more and more capital, and suggested that more and more cooperatives be established, Mao began to object, feeling that to allow this to

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    that nations are only concerned with their own interests bringing about minimal cooperation amongst states. When the Second World War ended, a political scientist, Hans Morgenthau (1904? 80), argued in his book ?Politics among Nations? that international politics is all about the struggle for power (Morgenthau, 1985).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work