• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valid is the view that, in the period 1855 1964, the lives of the peasants in Russia were constantly miserable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How valid is the view that, in the period 1855 - 1964, the lives of the peasants in Russia were constantly miserable? The statement in the question argues that, throughout the whole period of Russian history being studied, the lives of Russian peasants remained constantly miserable. This therefore suggests that all of Russia's peasants suffered the same amount throughout this period. It could also argue that the level of suffering remained the same for all peasants in this period. It is obvious that Russian peasants did suffer throughout this period. Whilst in power, both Tsars and Communists exploited the peasantry, beginning at the end of the Crimean War when it was clear that Russia needed to catch up with the rest of Europe and modernise. ...read more.

Middle

It would therefore seem that the evidence given so far would agree with the statement in the question. There were moments throughout this period that show the lives of the peasants were not constantly miserable. There were moments of reform where things seemed to get better for the peasants. During this period, Khruschev was the only leader to come from a peasant background. It is understandable then that it was him who undertook the most sincere reform of the period. The Virgin Lands policy gave peasants a new start, farming in the area of Siberia. However, this policy inevitably failed, as did most in this period. Stolypin attempted to put in place reforms that would also help the peasantry, especially in agriculture. ...read more.

Conclusion

Having to deal with redemption payments and losing rights that serf's had to farm on the Mir's land. When grain requisitioning was introduced, starting initially under Vyshnegradskii. An important factor in the lives of peasants was the First World War. Peasants were sent into battle poorly equipped and inevitably led to slaughter. It is correct to suggest that suffering was a dominant factor in the lives of the peasants throughout this period. However, it appears that the level of suffering amongst all the peasants was not entirely the same, an example of this being the Kulaks. However, the Kulaks suffered when Stalin came to power as he saw fit to try and extinct the Kulaks as a race. There were brief moments of reform, although these very rarely came to something. Peasants did suffer, but the level varied throughout the period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Although it is unfair to say there was no famine was suffered under Lenin or Khurschev, especially as millions died during the Civil War. Around 20 million Russians died during Stalin's rule, 1.5 million executed, 2 million died in camps, and 7 million died in famine29.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    Conditions under Stalin had severely declined compared with Tsarist Governments. Crops were destroyed in protest, livestock was returned to the collectives and after 1936 the effect of the great purges sunk in. The people who could have helped the peasantry improve their quality of life, such as academics and local

  1. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    Stolypin's electoral system changes and the Fundamental Laws reduced the effect of the Duma as the Mir and land captains had reduced the effect of emancipation. Nicholas II had only introduced the Duma as the October Manifesto was forced upon him, Lenin's abandonment war communism for NEP and Alexander II

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Most experienced officers had been removed or executed. * Industrial and agricultural changes had yet to take full effect; production would not reach full capacity for several years. Stalinism * Stalinism was Stalin's version of Lenin's Marxist philosophy. Some historians argue that Stalinism differed little from Lenin. They point to War Communism as an earlier version of total state control.

  1. Opposition to Russian governments was ineffective in the period from 1855 to 1964. How ...

    However, once he abdicated the Provisional Government made up from the Duma took over. As with Alexander II?s assassination there was no immediate alternative to Tsardom and the country initially operated on a similar basis. Generally under each Tsar there was little effective opposition even on the two occasions when

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    Viewed in such a way, the Wannsee Conference possibly making the official start to the Holocaust that the Jews endured, many contemporary historians consider it to be not the exact point in time where the decision to murder the Jews was made, which would place it in agreement with my point made previously.

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    This can be seen in Lenin?s dissolution of the Constituent Assembly after the Bolsheviks gained barely a quarter of the seats. This lack of modernisation can also be viewed socially because when Russia had limited economic resources in 1918, ?the government nationalized industry and subordinated it to central administrations in

  2. "Alexander II transformed the lives of the peasants" How far do you agree?

    However, overall industrial progress was still very slow especially compared to the West in production of steel, iron and coal. A specific aim of emancipation was to aid the development of free mobile wage labour and encourage the growth of large-scale mass consumer market to act as stimulus and incentive

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work