• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valuable is a field trip to the Tudor part of the Palace for finding out about how henry V111 used Hampton Court.

Extracts from this document...


How valuable is a field trip to the Tudor part of the Palace for finding out about how henry V111 used Hampton Court. There are three ways in which we can find out how Henry V111 would have used Hampton Court: * Written sources both primary and secondary * Remaining Tudor palaces other than Hampton Court * Hampton Court itself. How was the Palace used? Hampton Court was like a small town. There was enough room for more than 1,000 people to eat, sleep and worship. A Tudor palace was not just the King's home. It was the centre of the government of the country when the king stayed there. It had to impress people by its size and splendour. Source 20 tells us that Hampton Court was one of the greater houses, one of the buildings where the King and hid court kept full estate, where he was seen in all his magnificence. Sources 21 and 22 show that Henry wanted to make his palace even more spectacular after the departure of Wolsey. Source 22 states that �62,000 was spent in building works over a decade, which is equivalent to �2,000,000 these days, which is an awful lot. Henry wasn't worried about the cost of making the palace the best as long as it was made the best. Once Henry had spent his lavish amount of money, he had created at Hampton Court what was universally regarded as his most magnificent house after Whitehall. Source 22 goes on to show how many were employed at the Palace. This is the list from a modern pamphlet about the Palace: 49 masons 52 bricklayers 52 carpenters 13 joiners 9 plumbers 12 sawyers 4 plasterers 141 labourers This to me shows that Henry wanted the best. He employed lots and lots of people to decorate and change the court. Henry didn't want any trace of Wolsey in his new glamorous palace. ...read more.


and Windsor Castle. Henry spent 811 days here during his 38-year reign, which suggests that, although he was a regular visitor, his stays were short. All his six wives came to the palace and most had new and lavish sets of lodgings. The King also rebuilt his own rooms at least half a dozen times. The palace not only provided public and private sets of lodgings for the King and queen but also accommodation for each of the King's children and for a large number of courtiers, visitors and servants. By the time Hampton Court Palace was finished in about 1540, it was one of the most modern, sophisticated and magnificent palaces in England. There were tennis courts, bowling alleys and pleasure gardens for recreation, a hunting park of more than 1,100 acres, kitchens covering 36,000 square feet, a fine chapel, a vast communal dining room (the Great Hall) and a multiple garderobe (or lavatory) - known as the Great House of Easement - which could sit 28 people at a time. In the early 1540s, all this was augmented by a new system, which brought water from Coombe Hill in Kingston, three miles away, by lead pipes. This perspective view of the Great Hall by John Vardy, 1749, was dedicated to George II. Henry used Hampton Court to impress, most famously in August 1546, when he feasted and f�ted the French ambassador, his retinue of 200 gentlemen and 1,300 members of his own court for six days. For the occasion, the palace was surrounded by an encampment of gold and velvet tents. Half a century later, the Tudor palace was still among the most impressive in Europe. The Duke of W�rttemberg, who visited Hampton Court in 1592 during Elizabeth I's reign, called it 'the most splendid and most magnificent royal edifice to be found in England, or for that matter in other countries'. ...read more.


Conclusion: Visiting Hampton Court is a wonderful experience, almost like walking through a living history book that gradually reveals snippets of information about the former occupants, their lifestyles, changing fashions and ideas, and the different phases of architecture. With beautiful gardens, and the famous maze, it is easy to spend a whole day exploring this majestic building standing on the banks of the River Thames. The managers at Hampton Court I feel have tried to keep the Tudor style of Hampton Court alive. When we visited Hampton Court, there were several men and women dresses up as Tudors walking around giving tours of the Palace. This made me feel what it must have been like in the time of Henry V111 as these actors were re telling the story of Hampton Court. I feel the managers of Hampton Court have got it right in that sense, but some of the buildings have been altered too, which has spoiled the attraction, and also the introduction from tourism of caf�'s and restaurants etc., also I feel spoil the sense of Tudor atmosphere at the Palace I came to an overall conclusion that Hampton Court was not a valuable source of information when referring to how Henry used the palace. The reason for this is that many parts of the palace have been restored and refurbished for a number of different reasons, and in different eras so many original Tudor items can no longer be seen. Henry's private rooms are all gone. These would have included a library, bathroom, dressing room and galleries. We therefore cannot tell how he used them and thus make no deductions about the past from them. From my visit to Hampton Court, I can deduct that Hampton Court Palace, as an historical site cannot provide us with the correct and valid information to find out precisely how the Tudor court would have been used. However, put together with other sources, it allows historians to get an accurate picture of how life would have been for Henry and his servants during the sixteenth century at Hampton Court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    king, who is able to appeal to his men on their level. Henry's quality, depicted by Shakespeare of being an egalitarian continues towards the end of his speech; "For there is none of you so mean and base that hath not noble lusture in your eyes," here Henry is complementing

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    The poet shows his anger through the comparison of the cafe which the ordinary working class African has to eat in, and the posh restaurant available to those with money. Notice that both poets use contrast to convey some of their meaning.

  1. arctic story

    If we are going in totally the wrong direction then, we will have to walk all the way back the distance that we will walk this morning," I moaned. "You can check the map if you like," he suggested "It is so unclear," I said He does not understand that

  2. Henry V Character Analysis

    He also refuses to take responsibility for the death of his soldiers since "the King is not bound to answer the particular endings of his soldiers, the father of his son, nor the master of his servant" because "Every subject's duty is the King's, but every subject's soul is his own."

  1. How useful is a visit to the Tudor parts of Hampton Court to find ...

    Today Hampton Court can tell us about the above uses however; we must keep in mind that subsequent owners have altered parts of the palace, in some places beyond recognition in order to put their own mark on the Palace.

  2. Considered assessment of the Great War career of Field Marshal Douglas Haig.

    The rejection of the French plan is also a further example of both his decisive leadership and his inability to listen to advice and recommendations. This also shows that Haig's planning of attacks are of an extremely dictatorial nature with a strong sense that his traditions of leadership should be withheld regardless of any interventions.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * Labour was often seen to dismiss women?s suffrage as a middle-class concern. The party assumed that something would happen for Women automatically once universal suffrage had been achieved. Did * Keir Hardie ? first leader of the Labour party in the HoC supported the militant campaign and was close to the Pankhursts.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    This brought about the emergence of the Privy Council becoming a wider influence in the role of government, probably not dramatically witnessed in Henry?s last years but differently in the ruling of the country when Henry?s son Edward VI inherited the throne, this aristocratic approach to government in the 1540s

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work