• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How was it possible that despite Lenin’s warning in his Testament that Stalin would become the unquestioned leader of the Soviet Union by 1928

Extracts from this document...


Yousef Nassar April.6th.01 2.) How was it possible that despite Lenin's warning in his Testament that Stalin would become the unquestioned leader of the Soviet Union by 1928 Subsequent to Lenin's death on January 24th 1924, there were four candidates determined to occupy his former Position as leader of the Soviet Union. Trotsky, the number two to Lenin, commissar for war and leader of the Red Army, was struggling against his Archrival Stalin, the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party; and two additional candidates full of ambition Kamenev and Zinoviev. Why did Stalin out of these four men receive the position especially when Lenin warned about him in his Testament? In Lenin's testament, the observer can read comments such as " Stalin it too rude", "Remove Stalin from his post and replace him" (his post as General Secretary); he virtually asks his people to do away with Stalin and declare Trotsky the new leader. The only imperfection was that his Testament was never revealed to the Russian Society. ...read more.


His work was very closely thought out. He played the position of the moderate against the extremes. Stalin accused Trotsky of Ultra-Leftist Demagogy and joined in a triumvirate against Trotsky with Zinoviev and Kamenev. The latter two probably joined this Triumvirate because they wanted to weaken Trotsky's position to further strengthen theirs. After Stalin's rise to power as the leader of the Russian's, he adopted Trotsky's ideas and turned to the right. In the year of 1928, Stalin abandoned the NEP and brought enforced collectivization. Trotsky was a natural suspect for many Bolsheviks because he was extremely intelligent. Many of them preferred someone ordinary who was not an exception. They were looking for someone more like them and someone who had not only been with them for six years. Trotsky had been a part of the " other side" for a while as a Menshevik. How could the Bolsheviks be sure that he was completely reliable after gaining power? Trotsky in addition allowed free discussion within the party about the various problems Russia was facing. ...read more.


Also, due to their anger about Trotsky's book " The Lessons of October", in which he claimed that the two had opposed Lenin's plans for the revolution, they joined with Stalin to go against Trotsky. Surprisingly enough, after they had rid Trotsky of his position, they would have to face each other to fight for the position of leader of Russia. After a while, the two noticed that they were not in control of the situation. Stalin had many comrades in high positions, such as Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky. In 1927 Zinoviev and Kemenev were expelled from the Party. After this, the two tried to join with Trotsky to go against Stalin, but this attempt had failed. I think that by now we as the observers have a very good overview of what each one of the four individuals has done. It is my firm belief that if Trotsky had used the Red Army, he could have definitely claimed his place as Leader of the Soviet Union. But due to Stalin's smart tactics, lies and Triumvirate with Zinoviev and Kamenev, Trotsky was gotten rid off. Russia would not be the same as we know it today had Lenin's Testament been published in 1924. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Hurried work by unskilled workers could also wreck machinery in factories. Times like these led many factories to invent their production figures and dramatically inflate the amount that their factory was contributing. Looking back to collectivisation and its effect on different people, it is immediately obvious that some people benefited from collective farming whilst others lost everything.

  2. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    of understanding in the Kremlin."26 During, the 'Terror Famine' of 1933 it did. He says that Stalin did not follow the advice of Lenin, but ploughed on with his exploitation and destruction of the muzhik. This view further damages Stalinist claims of continued Bolshevik policies, for we know that had they actually been fulfilled, NEP would have survived.

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    On the other hand it could be argued that Trotsky was himself responsible for his own downfall encompassing many weaknesses which made him unfit for the power struggle. His poor health was a major hindrance however in addition Trotsky did not approve of "drudgery of Politics" and as a result

  2. Free essay

    Soviet Union

    Moreover, Stalin wanted to eliminate the class of prosperous peasants, the kulaks, which the New Economic Policy had encouraged because, he claimed, they were standing in the way of progress. But the real reason was probably political: Stalin saw the Kulak as the enemy of communism, he once said, "We

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    But the provisional government wouldn't give them it. This was because they though that they should leave it to the properly elected government. People began to take land anyway. 4. The return of Lenin When Lenin returned it was a whole new start to the revolution.

  2. 'Lenin's Testament'.

    One of the reasons for this was many of the party members were criticised and those who were wanted to rule out the testament and by the end was never even published. By 1924, the Politburo was divided into three sections, The Rightists, the leftists and the Central Moderates.

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    In doing this, he was appealing to yet more people and therefore gaining support as well as educating people in his ideas. It was short and simple to read, and due to the fact a vast majority of Russia?s population lacked much literary knowledge, they were able to read it with ease and were therefore influenced extensively.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    all what they prodUced and they didn�t had to share with anyone. Peasants like the feeling of independance. Knowing all this Stalin didn�t even bother to analyse the situation before taking a decision. He knew from the strart that many peasants oppose the idea of collectivisation, but he didn�t care.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work