• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular song

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1: How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular song? Opposition to the Vietnam War in literature was portrayed as being dreadful. 'Dispatches' by Michael Herr tells us about the images of bodies being piled up and the makes the war seem like it's a disgrace. All American war films made soldiers look out to be very vicious. The two songs we listened to were "Fixing to die rag" and "Goodnight Saigon". The first song, "Fixing to die rag" is very sarcastic about the war because parents know if they send there sons to war they there is a big chance they will die and the parents don't want that. In the other song"Goodnight Saigon" the war is made out to be a very unhappy place that no-one seems to want to be there. The soldiers don't have anything that they had at home and there is huge shortage of food. It tells us that it was that bad at the war that all the soldiers were really excited about the war and after they were all dead and coming home in body bags. ...read more.

Middle

It also shows that a lot of troops volunteered to go to war or else they were forced to go and if they were forced then it shows that it was no "ragged ass country". Source D shows the government spending for 1968. In 1968 13% of the countries spending went to help the war in Vietnam which was more that what was spent on Education and Welfare together. I think this shows us that the government was taking the war very seriously and that they needed as much help with money as they could get. If it was such an easy war then the Education would have had more money than what the war in Vietnam needed. This help to support that they took the war to easily at the start than what they should have. Source E shows all the presidents that had anything to do with the war. Every one of them predicted an early win to the war and that never happened. This shows us that the government did not take the war seriously. It was President Nixon who calls the ceasefire which shows us that they never took it seriously enough at the start of the war and expected an easy win and in the end up had to call the ceasefire because it was all getting to much for them. ...read more.

Conclusion

The government is saying they will win the war in a very short time with no problems and the public see what is really happening then they will be against the government and will be against the war. What is really happening is the Americans are not able to take out the cities of the Vietnamese as easily as they thought they would. This shows us that the government haven't lived up to what is really happening and a TV correspondent will show this to get people to go against the war. Source I is really just showing us exactly why a camera man and a TV correspondent can become more important than ten or twenty senators. Its shows us that no matter what orders or what are being said, the camera can point you out to be no better than the enemy. Source J shows us that even the troops don't want to be at the war now even though they did at the start. This shows us that even if you want to show are good you can still be shown out to be just as bad as the enemy. I think from all the sources together that no matter what a picture speaks more words than what a speech will. ?? ?? ?? ?? Scott Brier ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

    However some question whether this is still the case: "Future war will be fought not to pursue national interests, but to kill enemy leaders, to convert opponents to one's religion, to obtain booty, or sometimes for simple entertainment. Thus the core of Clausewitz's .philosophy of war - that states wage war using armies in pursuit of political objectives will disappear.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The prime minister should enjoy all the powers custumarily exercised by him; (iv) The distribution of posts on a confessional basis be abolished, although the principle of confessional equality should be maintained at the level of senior posts; (v) The naturalisation laws should be amended.

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    Talcum talks us through a conversation between two young lovers, "Hey Frankie, aren't you gonna give me your class ring? / I'm afraid I can't do that Annette / Why not? / Because I don't have any arms!". Talcum also ends this dialogue with a prolonged howl of laughter, but this is done to deliver his point.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    fighting a lost cause and that all the antiwar protesters were in fact right. They witnessed the tactics America used such as Napalm, bombing and search and destroy missions. Images of children be scalded alive by chemicals shifted Americas opposition from Vietnam to the once nationalist American home.

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam war portrayed in Contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    On the 27th June 1969 "life" magazine printed all 242 Americans that were killed during the week in the "Hamburger Hill" incident. Each dead soldier had there picture displayed on a full page. This showed the public that were was more to lose than public money.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    The poem also shows us the reaction of the American public to the war, " slow, rising hate makes people march and demonstrate". This shows how opposed the US people are to the war; they want to protest against it.

  1. Discuss the subplot to the film "The Three Kings", comment and analyse on the ...

    s and therefore decrease the significance of the subject in the shot, in this case, the Iraqi. When the soldier sets his sight on the Iraqi, we can clearly see that he is waving a white flag, a universal signal of peace and surrender.

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    or in which they have an interest (e.g. Saudi Arabia - oil). My theory, that terrorism is a new wave of war can be proved with my last statement, as wars in old times were for gaining new filed, and money.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work