• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How was Stalin able to defeat both his left and right opponents?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How was Stalin able to defeat both his left and right opponents? There were many combining factors that enabled Josef Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, better known as Josef Stalin, to so easily slip into the role of successor to Lenin. His path the leadership of the Communist party of the Soviet Union,(the CPSU) can be attributed to many factors and certainly cannot be put down to inevitable occurrence as Stalin was by no means the natural choice for leader following the death of Lenin in 1924 especially as the deceased leader's testament had branded Stalin "too rude." In 1903 Lenin created the Bolshevik party, and successfully led it through three revolutions to the helm of government, and headed the world's first socialist state. His authority was recognised within the party and he was a respected leader. By 1918 a civil war broke out dividing the county. Lenin foresaw that a united Bolshevik front against the bourgeoisie (the whites) was a necessity and also that the government (SOVNARKOM) would be the dominant force in the new civil state following the cessation of the civil war. Thus in the same year all other political parties were banned and thus the CSPU remained the only party from which SOVNARKOM ministers could be drawn from. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin in fact described him as "The most valuable member of the party" in his testament, although he stated his views contained too much enthusiasm for peasant profits and capitalism also. This was seen as un-Marxist, and he was forced to withdraw an article, which declared that the peasants should "Enrich yourselves". Bukharin had been very close friends with Stalin, and didn't expect him to reverse his support for N.E.P in 1928. Bukharin therefore, I believe, was an easier opponent for Stalin when he decided to introduce his Five Year Plan and Collectivisation of Agriculture in 1928-33, and Stalin's defeat of the right was made easier because of Bukharin's lack of power base within the party as Stalin, since being General Secretary, had created a firm one for himself. Bukharin was never the opponent the Trotsky was as he failed to come up with a successful plan to counter the arguments of super-industrialises. As a result he never really proved his abilities to his colleagues. Two politburo members who Stalin used as 'rightist allies' to block Trotsky were Kamenev and Zinoviev. They both initially supported N.E.P and attacked Trotsky's views. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin also held the power to the party and thus the right never were given a free hearing just as Stalin's enemies were not when he was party secretary. Trade Unions were the only hope of Stalin's oppositions yet Stalin still acted decisively against them. He sent the ruthless Politburo member Kaganovich, to undertake a purge against the suspect Trade Unionists. He also sent Molotov to carry out similar actions against the Moscow CPSU using loyal Party officials within its structure. As a result of this, by early 1929, Tomsky was no longer Trade Union Leader, Uglanov had been replaced in Moscow, Rykov had been superseded as premier by Molotov and Bukharin had been voted out as chairman of the Commintern and lost his place in the Politburo. They were in effect "dropping like flies" and Stalin wasn't having to work too hard for power. The gulf was never that wide between the left and right but Stalin exploited what little gap there was well. Overall I feel that none of Stalin's opposition from the left or the right had the confidence or the conviction to actually seriously challenge Stalin for the right to become Bolshevik leader, and as MaCauley states: "Stalin was greatly assisted by the inept tactics of his opponents." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    This opportunity came in 1869 when the Spanish Succession crisis made war inevitable and he saw the opportunity a war with France would have, hence he manipulated the Ems telegram to cause war. If Bismarck did not have aims of uniting Germany then the Franco-Prussian war may not have happened

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    His loyalty was, moreover, to Lenin and not to the abstract entity known as the Bolshevik Party. Had Lenin not returned from Zurich and had Stalin, Kamenev and Muranov kept the party on its conciliationist path, there is an excellent chance that Sverdlov would have directed his formidable talents towards some other internationalist and pro-Soviet organization.

  1. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    different.14 We now realise why Stalin was able to discard Trotsky as easily. Firstly he was a Jew and only committed himself to Bolsheviks in 1917, whilst Stalin was already since 1903. Therefore the majority preferred Stalin as their leader than the arrogant and Jewish Trotsky.

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    The workers were constantly bombarded with propaganda posters, slogans, and radio broadcasts. Often production was increased at the expense of quality. In many cases output figures were complete lies, and were falsified out of fear. Changes in Agriculture When Stalin took over as leader, agriculture was mainly being carried on by peasants working their own plots.

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    As the referendum was so unexpected, there was no plan from this point onwards. Hitler began to exert pressure through right-wing Austrian parliament members, demanding that the referendum be cancelled and that Seyss-Inquart replace Schuschnigg as Chancellor. From here on however, Herman Goering became the "man of the hour".

  2. War communism and NEP

    This pragmatic approach caused Lenin, to again, show he was willing to be realistic rather than ideological to help survive the revolution. As the political issues grew narrower for Lenin, this caused him to create the new economic policy or NEP.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    2. In NEP Russia, much more art was free of communist ideology ï Lenin believed in ‘Art for Art’s sake’. Western films were more popular than Soviet films. In the 1930s, the State took more control of all aspects of media and culture.

  2. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    He, from the very beginning was a 'yes man' following Lenin till the very end. However one major strength that Lenin foresaw was Stalin?s ability to challenge his thoughts and ideologies. Stalin from the very beginning has 'a very strong personality' (Lenin)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work