• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How was Stalin able to emerge as leader of the Soviet Union by 1929?

Extracts from this document...


How was Stalin able to emerge as leader of the Soviet Union by 1929? Stalin was a quiet man for many years of his life and was not especially well known for a long period of time before he emerged as leader of the USSR in 1929. His political career began very young, being expelled at an early age for writing Marxist essays at the school he attended. This though did not deter Stalin however and he continued his ideas, writing Marxist essays for a Georgian newspaper. Stalin remained a faithful member of the Bolshevik party throughout the troubled times. Between 1902 and 1911 Stalin was arrested 5 times and exiled twice. He however came through all of this, with the amnesty being signed in 1917 he returned to Russia. All of this early life activity indicated that Stalin had a fruitful career ahead but up until this point no one had actually really noticed Stalin and his potential and a big question was would they notice him in the future years before it was too late? ...read more.


This may not seem vitally important but when we consider that when Lenin died the race was on to become most popular, Bukharin and Trotsky limited themselves as they could not promote things that their sides disagreed with. Stalin on the other hand was able to produce very vague policies, enveloping most of the Russian population and so maximising his potential for votes, and therefore putting him ahead of the game in the chances of becoming the new leader of Russia. I believe we can consider this as Stalin's personal characteristics as it was his own clever thinking of not leaning to the left or right that may well have had an influence on him being able to emerge as Russia's leader. The main differences between the members were surrounded around the NEP. The leftists disagreed with the NEP and thought Russia should become an industrial nation. They feared the NEP would leave the USSR weak and vulnerable to invasion, leading back to the days of war and possibly communism. ...read more.


Trotsky did later claim that Stalin had told him the wrong date for the funeral, so was this cunning on Stalin's part or neglect on Trotsky's. I believe that this is a strong show of politics, several tactical decisions trying to change the face of several politicians. The result of this set of events was to show Trotsky in a bad light and conveniently place Stalin in a good one but it has never been proven that Stalin planned this and so it has to be up to the individual to decide. I think that both parties played a very clever game throughout the leadership struggle and so find it hard to determine who may have been at fault. At this stage of the game it had become apparent that there were only two main contenders for the leadership battle: Lenin and Trotsky. Although Lenin, Kamenev and Zinoviev had formed a triumvirate against Trotsky it was obvious that only one out of the three would emerge to challenge Trotsky and that was Stalin. The two contenders wanted very different things out of leadership and there were several main leadership issues that were vital to their successes. Liz Power 22.10.03 DP - History - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    As a result the highly significant institutional positions of Stalin, and the lower positions of his rivals allowed Stalin to gather an essential support base which eventually lead to his takeover of power. .....................................Stalin's personal qualities contributed to his own appearance as leader of the Soviet Union.

  2. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    I would conclude that Lenin did make a difference because without him, people would not of got what he wanted; the Bolshevik coup would of failed. He did some think different, he listened to the people, he found out what they wanted and helped them, where as other leaders wouldn't, hey would of done it their way.

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    By 1937 40% of industrial workers were women. Many new hospitals and clinics were built. Large numbers of doctors were trained, over half of them were women. By 1940 the USSR had more doctors per head of population than Great Britain. Education became free and compulsory for all.

  2. Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as leader of USSR in 1929?

    He suggested that Russia could save itself and that Bolshevism should remain only in Russia. He showed that he was the saviour of Russian people and showed Trotsky to be the opposite again, anti-Russian.

  1. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky emerge as leader of the USSR in 1929

    I believe that Luck also favoured Stalin rather Trotsky. For example Lenin and Svedlov died at the right time for Stalin. A time were he was increseing in power and his potential/amition growing.Also on the day of Lenin's death Stalin found the perfect opportunity to be appointed as leader and rule out Trotsky.

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    Fixated at the left wing of the Party lay Trotsky, and at the right wing of the Party lay Bukharin. Stalin, however, made the decision to position himself at the centre. This was not out of being undecided, but yet another method that he believed would enhance and greater his

  1. Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    one who actually did everything which eventually led to the collapse of the provisional governemt and rise of Bolsheviks who were victorious in the October revolution. It is possible to argue then, that Lenin was a weak leader as he didn?t organise anything, however it must also be considered that

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Many developments were begun from almost nothing. 4. R. Davies: “The armaments industry of the 1930s was the most outstanding success of the pre-war Soviet economy”. 5. Geographical shift in industry ï more and more moved to the Urals and previously undeveloped Central Asian republics. 6. Considerable population shift.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work