• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify and evaluate the relative impact of the factors, which made reform of the Soviet system increasingly likely by the mid 1980s.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

20TH CENTURY RUSSIAN POLITICS (08 10718) SECOND ASSESSED ESSAY Identify and evaluate the relative impact of the factors, which made reform of the Soviet system increasingly likely by the mid 1980s Introduction By the mid 1985 Mikhail Gorbachev faced the unenviable task of attempting to reform the Soviet Union. His main policies of this period, perestroika (restructuring), uskorenie (acceleration) and glasnost (openness) attempted to deal with the myriad problems facing, and to reform, the Soviet system the Soviet Union survived as a nation. To understand why Andropov, Chernenko and especially Gorbachev initiated reform it is necessary to look at the main pressures on the Soviet system by 1985. Specific problems have been grouped for easier analysis and shall be looked at in due course. Firstly; there were problems with the Political system, secondly; social problems with their resultant pressure on the political and economic systems, and thirdly; the economy. Two major areas of the economy may have been a decisive factor on forcing reforms. The Agricultural and Military sectors will be looked at in slightly more depth, as by 1985 the escalating costs of maintaining both were a major drain on capital investment in other areas. As problems are identified their relative importance and reasons for causing reforms will be assessed. Throughout the essay views of leading academics will be considered. Finally conclusions will be made on the impact of the factors, points briefly explained, citing evidence previously discussed. Problems with the political system and policy The problems of the political system were a major reason for reforms. Firstly the government's policies of the Brezhnev era were a major cause of reform because of their negative effects on society and the economy. ...read more.

Middle

Sakwa argues that the Soviet Union had "become industrialised when the advanced countries were moving into the post-industrial era" 11, in which services, information flow and technology are more important than heavy industry. The failure of the Brezhnev administration to act upon this even after it became apparent was a major factor in reform being required, as it was necessary to invigorate the economy and industry to drive innovation in order to catch up with the west. Domestically, by the 1980s Soviet economy faced many problems exacerbated by poor central control. An example is the poor supply of consumer goods. It can be attributed to the Governments' failure to appreciate "the volume and process of supply and volume and direction of demand"12. State stores of products retained surpluses to supply state installations first in the event of shortage. Consumers always came last. This lead to a 'second economy' as Kaser (1981) describes it, a supply of consumer goods based on Theft, Speculation, Illicit production and corrupt purchasing. This in turn deprived the state of revenue, as currency was lost to corrupt citizens. As a factor this was important in causing reform as it was necessary to change the emphasis of the Soviet economy to light industry and technology to prevent this happening. By 1980 the Soviet economy was still biased towards Heavy industry and was producer, not consumer, driven. This hampered innovation as goods were produced to often obsolete or inappropriate specifications, as consumers were not considered as to what they wanted. The exception was in the military sector, which will be analysed in short order. A lack of competition found in free market economies further stifled innovation and development and left the Soviet Union technologically backward when compared to ...read more.

Conclusion

For example Social problems were mainly caused by dissatisfaction with the 'system' and were, it can be argued, a direct consequence of both misguided political decisions / policy and economic troubles. Sliianie (fusion of nations) resulted in yearning for national identity while over investment in Heavy industry resulted in a lack of consumer goods and a lower standard of living for the citizen. If the economy had been more developed and standards of living higher, would nationalist feeling against Sliianie and the sovietskii narod by non-Russian nations have been so high? It is true that strong negative feelings are often born from times of hardship, for example a rise in German anti-Semitic feeling after the defeat in the First World War, and usually directed at organisations / figures in authority. Would this have made reforms in demographic policy less necessary? It is those factors that damaged the economy so irreparably such as military overspending that had the most impact in affecting reform. These factors brought hardship to the everyday citizen, by resulting in problems such as relatively poor living conditions, lack of consumer goods, and food shortages. It can be argued that although eventually, political factors such as lack of participation would lead to disillusionment among the population, factors resulting from a weak economy that tangibly affected the citizen were more important in affecting reform. Kaser (1982) states "the economic problems of the 1980s...have an important political dimension" because, he argues, if an economy fails to produce for the average citizen, or causes the citizen to incur hardship, the legitamacy of the party to rule is called into question26. If the party lost its' legitamacy to rule and its' authority in the eyes of citizens it would surely be replaced. For this reason Economic concerns were the most important factor in affecting major reform of the Soviet system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Neither Stalin, Khrushchev or Brezhnev successfully addressed fundamental economic problems which increasingly dogged the ...

    This was successful in the way that it effectively produced large amounts of raw materials such as coal (149 million tons in 1945 to 261 million tons in 1950) and oil (19 million tons in 1945 to 40 million tons in 1950).

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    and it was agreed to delegated Gemayel to approach the Americans for revision of the 17 May pact, to make it a purely military arrangement. On 13 November, at a critical time for Syria in dealing with both Arafat and Gemayel, Hafiz al-Asad suffered a heart attack, precipitating a leadership crisis in Damascus.

  1. Gorbachev(TM)s reforms and policies, which were intended originally to strengthen the Soviet system, eventually ...

    People of the Soviet Union could know do things which they could not in the past, such as criticizing the government, practicing religion and even hold rallies. Gorbachev intended to have more openness in the government to restore faith in the system of government and to end corruption.

  2. Why were the Prague Spring reforms unacceptable to the Soviet leadership?

    as 'counter-revolutionary' and were certainly not in the same vein as the Hungarian uprising of 1956. "Dubcek repeatedly spoke only of expanding priestor which can be roughly translated as 'space' or 'scope', to allow wider participation."6 The reason that Dubcek decided to adopt this policy of priestor seems to relate

  1. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    Whoever controlled the Party thus had great power and influence. * In 1921 there had been a Ban on Factions within the Party to try to minimise dissent. Some leading Bolsheviks, like Trotsky, wanted more openness in the party and more debate on issues and policies.

  2. American History.

    and then stole their land. - Anyhow, with the support of the Indians the Jamestown colonists managed to survive for the first few years. Their first taste of independent government came a while down the road, though, with the introduction of the House of Burgesses by the Virginia Company established the House of Burgesses in 1619.

  1. Why did the Communist system fail in the 1980's? What were the different reasons ...

    Another thing wrong with the system was that there was lots of corruption in the system. The Communist party bosses lived in luxury and the distribution of what was left of the national income was very uneven as it was concentrated on the Party leaders.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    The Non-Aligned Movement which was formulated in this period sought a new agenda to carve a third bloc away from the East and the West. This brought complexity to the International system as it had a lasting effect on the United Nations where a new majority was developed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work