If Philip had died in 1584, his foreign policy would have been considered a success?

Authors Avatar

If Philip had died in 1584, his foreign policy would have been considered a success?

Traditionally Philip has been viewed as the aggressive ‘Black Legend’, a Catholic Monarch who, through foreign policy seeked to expand his lands and destroy Protestantism and heresy.  He was greatly influenced by his father who even provided ‘Instructions of 1543’ stating that Philip ‘should not give up one inch of territory’.  This traditional view is a misconception and in fact Philip’s foreign policy was less aggressive and more conservative in approach.  Philip had both successes and failures in foreign policy throughout his reign.  However it can be argued that during the period before 1584, he enjoyed more success in his policies.

When Philip came to throne, Henry II of France was very much the aggressor.  France posed a particular threat to Spain, since Henry viewed Spain to be in a vulnerable position after the death of Charles I and the arrival of an inexperienced Philip to take his place.  However Philip’s foreign policy with France was relatively successful.  Philip realised the importance of ending the Italian campaign with France if he was to save Milan and preserve his credibility.  Surprisingly France agreed to a five-year truce at Vaucelles in February 1556.  

Philip had an additional concern.  The Pope Paul IV was a Francophile and strengthened the anti-Spanish alliance.  He was keen to persuade Henry II to join him in an invasion of Naples.  Philip’s reaction to the situation was to conduct a pre-emptive strike.  It was a financially expensive and morally provocative but it was actually a successful move.  The Duke of Alva marched troops into the Papal States in September 1556, whilst the opposition failed to capture Naples and retreated to France.  Philip treated the Papacy with generosity, making no territorial or financial demands, in return for peace.  This was a wise decision because Philip earned a reputation for clemency, which gained him the support of major states in Italy.

However Spanish relations with France remained poor.  Philip wished to demonstrate that he could at least match Henry’s power.  Philip’s alliance with England secured control over the channel.  Philip invaded St. Quentin in Northern France and the expected response from Henry came in December 1557 when the French captured the English town of Calais.  Philip was furious, because Henry’s success had encouraged him to make further attacks on the Netherlands.  However Franco- Spanish peace talks were underway since neither side could afford to continue the war.  Peace was agreed and although Calais was lost Philip arranged to marry Henry’s daughter Elizabeth and was delighted with the treaty signed on 3rd April.  His reputation had been established.

Join now!

Philip’s foreign policy towards France after 1559 was to keep it politically divided and religiously united.  However he had very little involvement in French policy until relations worsened in 1568.  Finally his family ties were broken with the death of Elizabeth, and Philip turned down her sister in favour of Anne of Austria.  More particularly Philip was aware of France ‘probing his weaknesses’.  Threats were made by France to Perpignan and the Netherlands.  Philip was pleased in August 1572, however, to hear of a massacre of St. Bartholomew, confirming that France was again at war with itself.

After ...

This is a preview of the whole essay