• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Imperial Germany was defeated due to a variety of different factors, some more significant than others, these included, the failure of the Schlieffen plan

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Imperial Germany was defeated due to a variety of different factors, some more significant than others, these included, the failure of the Schlieffen plan (1914), the Battle of the Somme (1916), war on the Eastern Front, the U-boat campaigns, the USA's entry into the war (April 1917) and the Ludendorf Offensive (March 1918). I think that the failure of the Schlieffen plan was one of the most important contributory factors leading to the fall of Imperial Germany as many other factors came about as a direct result of it's failure. If the Schlieffen plan had been a success then Germany wouldn't have faced a war on two fronts, and I think that if this were the case then Germany would have probably won the war. The original aim of the Schlieffen plan was to invade France through Belgium and Luxembourg, then to defeat the French rapidly and then turn to the eastern front far a major offensive against Russia. Schlieffen attempted to ensure success by avoiding invading through the supposedly impregnable Hindenburg line, which had been built by the French to prevent such an attack, instead invading through Belgium, who he thought would put up little resistance. ...read more.

Middle

Germany thought that if political forces that were opposed to peace in Russia won the civil war, then the Eastern front would be under threat again so troops were kept there to keep Germany safe. The Battle of the Somme was aimed to break the stalemate that had continued for almost two years on the Western front, it was described as being the big push. The original aim of the big push, was to break through the German lines and split it in two by heading to Cambrai and Douai. There are many reasons as to why the Battle of the Somme failed to achieve it's targets, Prior to the attack there was a week long preliminary bombardment, which was intended to completely wipe out the German front lines, but the shells were ineffective as the British lacked high-explosive shells in their arsenal at the time and the concussion shells used only churned up no-mans land, making it even more difficult to cross. Also, due to a variety of political leaks, the German Army was warned to expect a major offensive in the near future, so when the bombardment began, they would have realised that this was the start of the offensive, and as the concussion shells were almost useless, the Germans were given a week to ready them selves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Success still lead to defeat because Germany couldn't follow up the victory, the moral of the troops was low, partly due to the blockades, and most were not willing to carry on fighting, also there was a naval mutiny, due to the navy being sent on an almost suicidal mission. I don't think that the Ludendorf offensive was the reason that they lost the war although it had an immediate impact, with out Ludendorf offensive, I think that Germany would have lost though perhaps this would have been later. Other factors also contributed to defeat. The introduction of the tank at Cambrai, may have had an Impact, it was a new form of warfare and it took the Germans by surprise. Also the blockades lowered moral, both on the German fronts and that of the German public, causing food riots and revolts. I also think that sheer bad luck also lead to Germany's defeat. I think that Germany lost the war due to a combination of all the factors, but I think that the most contributory factor was probable the failure of the Schleiffen plan at the start of the war because the consequences of it's failure continued throughout the majority of the war. I also think that a range of other factors were also to blame. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Both sides used chlorine or mustard gas which is poisonous gases; they were used to try to kill the enemy's front line of soldiers. It was not very reliable and both sides carried masks, so it was not used much in the later part of the war.

  2. Dunkirk - A success or failure?

    a secondary source as well as information must have been gathered from somewhere for David to collect the information. Source 4 also shows the great miracle and success which Dunkirk was to the British as a whole, Source 4 is a map showing the area around Dunkirk it was created by an unknown source/ illustrator.

  1. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    the French resistance who helped prepare for D-Day and also the British bombed Calais four times as much as they did Normandy to give Hitler the impression they were invading at Calais rather than Normandy. Therefore, Hitler sent more troops to defend Calais and this was completely unnecessary.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on ...

    The Germans tried a number of other offensives and strategies, none of which provided them with a significant breakthrough. The other two main failures for Germany were the U-boat campaign which started quite early on in the war and carried on throughout and the Ludendorff Offensive in the spring of 1917.

  1. The Marshall Plan.

    require a much longer time and greater effort than had been foreseen. There is a phase of this matter which is both interesting and serious. The farmer has always produced the foodstuffs to exchange with the city dweller for the other necessities of life.

  2. The Schlieffen Plan and the Reality

    this failed as the Germans were significantly stronger with firepower and soldiers. Although the French were defeated Von Moltke had to send soldiers from his force in Belgium. The next big alteration in the Schlieffen Plan was Germany headed East of Paris rather than South and West and this would not surround Paris.

  1. Armed forces.

    1841 Hong Kong established, Livingstone arrives in Africa Peel PM Said ibn Sayyid makes Zanzibar his capital 1842 Treaty of Nanking, US/Canada border agreed, Kabul garrison annihilated in Khyber pass, Brooke made Rajah of Sarawak Income tax reintroduced France occupies Tahiti, Guinea and Gabon Verdi's Nabucco First use of Anaesthetic

  2. To what extent did the Schlieffen plan cause Germany's defeat on the western front?

    Germany's resistance in a long war was centred on its one masterstroke, the U-Boat campaign. Britain had forever been an 'Island fortress.' This made it very difficult to attack, due to its excellent navy and partly because of the 21-mile minimum 'moat.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work