• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"In all that he did, his main aim was to secure himself in power." How far do you agree with this judgement on Napoleon's policies as First Consul?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"In all that he did, his main aim was to secure himself in power." How far do you agree with this judgement on Napoleon's policies as First Consul? After the Coup of Brumaire in 1799, Napoleon emerged as the new leader of France and devised a system of government that gave him effective control over all aspects of life in France. He controlled religion, education, law-making, policing, legal reforms and the economic situation by putting in place a series of policies, designed both to comply with some principles of the Revolution whilst also giving Napoleon control and security in power. This essay looks to investigate how far each of these policies suggest that Napoleon's main aim was always to secure himself in power. Napoleons policy of police and propaganda is the most obviously repressive of all the policies. Many aspects of his heavy policing conform with dictatorial regimes, as does his policy of censorship and (often false or manipulated) propaganda. France became effectively a Police State, with Napoleon at the core. The Minister of Police, Joseph Fouch´┐Ż, who controlled National Security, established a network of informers who monitored public opinion and reported on any suspicious political activity. ...read more.

Middle

Napoleon was raised a Catholic and was keen to encourage religion within France, as this quote shows: "No society can exist without equality of fortunes; and equality of fortunes can not exist without religion." However, the Concordat was manipulated to Napoleons obvious advantage as well. In signing the Concordat, the Pope agreed to endorse the Revolution and regime, state control of the churches and church appointments and accept the loss of church lands during the Revolution. Also, in 1802, Napoleon attached the Organic Articles, without papal agreement, to the Concordat. These guaranteed the revolutionary principle of religious toleration and made the Protestant and Jewish churches similarly subject to state authority. It can be argued that one of Napoleon's aims in forming the Concordat was to ensure a lack of interference from the church, meaning his position in France could not be affected by the Pope or any other religious order. However, whether or not this was his main motive in signing the Concordat is less certain. Although the church was a powerful tool in controlling and influencing the public and was often used as a vehicle of propaganda, Napoleon's desire to influence and manipulate the public cannot justify other aspects of the Concordat such as the state responsibility for the payment of the clergy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Others, such as his educational policy, are subtler, encouraging support for the regime through improved life within France. In all areas, he is seen as either directly influencing the public, either by force or by propaganda, or indirectly influencing the public by creating better conditions in France, therefore encouraging support of the regime. I believe that it was Napoleon's main aim to secure himself in power. After all, if he fell out of favour quickly, all of his other aims, such as creating a better France, would fall with him. It was implicit that he secured himself in power as soon as possible, in order that he might put all his other aims into action. Ultimately, most of his actions aimed either to limit or prevent the impact any opposes to the regime may have on Napoleon's security in power or to create a better France thereby increasing popularity of the regime. However that is not to say that other policies did not centre around a different aim, such as the economic policy, which aimed to create financial stability in France primarily, and possibly may have contributed to increased support and popularity of Napoleon and his regime. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * All Napoleon's campaigns were conducted using the weapons of the Ancien Regime. * The musket was still the standard infantry weapon - a smooth-bored, muzzle-loading flintlock firing lead bullets, and fitted with a bayonet. Its firepower was limited, its rate of fire slow and its accuracy poor except at close range.

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    The gold ploughed into Austria, Prussia and Russia, known as "Pitt's cavalry", was vital not only in supporting the continental armies but also in persuading them to take up arms in the first place. It may be pointed out that this could not have been a major factor as Britain

  1. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    Similarly, Napoleon also claimed to fulfil the revolutionary principle of "national sovereignty" with his 1802 Constitution; which was what officially cemented Napoleon firmly into a position of personal power. A plebiscite was held in August 1802 on whether Napoleon should be made Life Consul - the result was that the large majority allegedly supported this.

  2. How far did Napoleon Bonaparte maintain the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality in ...

    He was able to gain the title of first consul which meant that he alone would control ministers, introduce legislation and decide foreign policy. So, there was no compromise and Napoleon had the last word. According to Stuart Miller, The Constitution of year VIII verified the rights of property and individual liberty.

  1. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    countered by: "...another child had written to the Czar, the Little Father, as they call him, and for their pains more than one has felt the knout and the Cossack's whip" (same source). Such duality mirrored Alexander II's reign.

  2. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    and that after having vigorously pressed them back you should turn towards us and join us in surrounding the enemy." 7 Soult however did not deliver the message as Napoleon had directed but took it directly to Drouet d'Erlon who left the battle at Quatre-Bras and marched to Ligny to assist Napoleon.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The Gailician offensive was a fiasco with casualties estimated at 200 000, this brought about a loss of morale in the army and an increase in desertions. It can be argued that the military disaster of the June offensive undermined and discredited the Provisional government, not just because of the

  2. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    Mussolini was able to separate himself from the excesses of violence, claiming in 1922 that the PNF had never condoned any form of violence. This claim was enough to prove that Mussolini could still be a credible leader, as despite any behind-the-scenes officially instigated violence his public image still remained

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work