• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michael Dickinson 11-1 28 April, 2007 In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan? In this essay I will be writing about whether it was right to drop the atomic bombs "little boy" and "Fat Man" on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. These two bombs where dropped by the USA and an estimated 106,000 people died on the impact of the bomb, and by 1950 around 200,000 people had died overall by radiation sickness. The people of Japan had no warning. It was this event that ended WWII and it meant that the USA did not have to risk its army by invading Japan. ...read more.

Middle

The Americans also seemed to want revenge for the treatment of allied P.O.Ws. The Japanese had put allied P.O.Ws in labour camps with awful conditions. They were often malnourished, tortured and many of them died. There are also lots of points for not dropping the bomb. One of these is the huge loss of life in a single blast. 70,000 people died from the first bomb. In the blitz in Britain, which lasted 9 months, only 43,000 people where killed. Some would argue that the USA had no right to sacrifice this amount of civilians for it's own army. The Americans had also said that the Japanese would never surrender this wasn't strictly the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

One eye witness, Father Kleinsorge, describes 20 people he found in a bush that where still alive. "Their faces where wholly burned, their eye sockets hollow, the fluid from their melted eyes had run down their cheeks. Their mouths where pus covered wounds, which they could not bear to stretch enough to admit the spout of a teapot." To conclude I would say that it was not right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, because although they might not have known the full story before they dropped the bomb, they still must have known it would be incredibly inhumane. It think it would have been a lot more acceptable to accept conditional surrender, or even to fight to the last man than to drop the atomic bomb on innocent citizens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    However they were taking a terrible battering from US aeroplanes. Each month 40,000 tons of bombs were dropped onto Japanese cities, 60 cities had half there houses destroyed, 90% of the navy and merchant shipping had been sunk and Honshu (the largest of the 4 main Islands)

  2. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    This make these sources bias. The fact that the sources were written by Americans tells us that they are unreliable, although they are speaking the truth, the truth was spoken by Americans and they needed to convince people the dropping the bombs was justified.

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    To this day the long term effect is still evident. Over the span of four months after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, tens of thousands more Japanese died, for they were infected with various illnesses from the amount of radiation they were exposed to.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    Yet still the Japanese didn't surrender. On August 9, 1945 at aproximately 11.02, a weapon, containing a core of 8 kg of plutonium-239, was dropped over Nagasaki's industrial valley. It exploded 469 meters (1,540 feet) above the ground almost midway between the Mitsubishi Steel and Arms Works, in the south,

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    As anticipated, Japan bluntly did not attend. Shortly after this, the Americans had decided that they were going to evacuate all their nationals from Chinese territories. The Japanese militarists saw this move as "a sign of weakness". To test the ever so fragile cabinet and leader of the Americans, Japan

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    When the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing an estimated quarter of a million civilians and military personnel as well as causing mass destruction, the war was abruptly brought to a close. Despite the remarkable efficacy of the bombs in forcing Japanese surrender it remains a controversial

  1. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    This need for retribution was also fuelled by the news of Japanese war crimes. Prisoners of war were often starved to death, beaten, tortured and killed. For example, during the Bataan Death March in April 1942, many thousands died due to brutal treatment, executions, hunger and disease.

  2. Discussing Japan.

    The export figures from Japan are listed below: Japan exports 15% of it's products to the E.U, 33% to Asia, 6% to South Korea, 6% to Taiwan, 5% to Hong Kong, 5% to Singapore, 3% to China, 2% to Australia, 31% to North America, 29% to the U.S.A, 6.5% to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work