• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michael Dickinson 11-1 28 April, 2007 In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan? In this essay I will be writing about whether it was right to drop the atomic bombs "little boy" and "Fat Man" on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. These two bombs where dropped by the USA and an estimated 106,000 people died on the impact of the bomb, and by 1950 around 200,000 people had died overall by radiation sickness. The people of Japan had no warning. It was this event that ended WWII and it meant that the USA did not have to risk its army by invading Japan. ...read more.

Middle

The Americans also seemed to want revenge for the treatment of allied P.O.Ws. The Japanese had put allied P.O.Ws in labour camps with awful conditions. They were often malnourished, tortured and many of them died. There are also lots of points for not dropping the bomb. One of these is the huge loss of life in a single blast. 70,000 people died from the first bomb. In the blitz in Britain, which lasted 9 months, only 43,000 people where killed. Some would argue that the USA had no right to sacrifice this amount of civilians for it's own army. The Americans had also said that the Japanese would never surrender this wasn't strictly the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

One eye witness, Father Kleinsorge, describes 20 people he found in a bush that where still alive. "Their faces where wholly burned, their eye sockets hollow, the fluid from their melted eyes had run down their cheeks. Their mouths where pus covered wounds, which they could not bear to stretch enough to admit the spout of a teapot." To conclude I would say that it was not right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, because although they might not have known the full story before they dropped the bomb, they still must have known it would be incredibly inhumane. It think it would have been a lot more acceptable to accept conditional surrender, or even to fight to the last man than to drop the atomic bomb on innocent citizens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    This make these sources bias. The fact that the sources were written by Americans tells us that they are unreliable, although they are speaking the truth, the truth was spoken by Americans and they needed to convince people the dropping the bombs was justified.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    we were talking about dealing with the people who hadn't hesitated at Pearl Harbor to make a sneak attack destroying not only ships but the lives of many America soldiers." The US government used a lot of propaganda as a way to remind Americans of the attack on Pearl Harbor,

  1. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    This pressure to appease American taxpayers and government adds an entirely new dynamic to the decision to use the atomic bombs. The implications of this new dynamic are best explained by President Truman's Secretary of War, Henry Stimson.

  2. Why did the USA drop the A-Bomb on Japan in 1945?

    Truman considered his options, he wanted to finish the war as soon as possible, yet he wanted to minimise casualties on both sides;

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    The number of casualties from Tokyo and the number of casualties for Nagasaki were approximately the same, however, the incendiary bombs were dropped on Tokyo where they suffered higher casualties. This shows a very strong point to why did America use the atomic bombs when, if they would have continued incendiary bombings may have lead to Japanese surrender.

  2. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    Right through the war the Americans wanted retribution for the humiliation caused, and as the momentum for revenge increased, the Americans wanted to do more to damage the Japanese. So when the bomb was ready, the majority of people wanted it to be used.

  1. On the 6th August 1945, America dropped the first ever atomic bomb on a ...

    In 1941 the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour to slow down the Americans from stopping them taking over land in the Far East. The plan was for the Japanese to take over territories that belonged to Britain, France and Holland in south East Asia.

  2. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    The rate of wounded to fatalities was estimated to be 3 to 1, so 175,000 US casualties were not out of the question. However these early reports were rejected by George Marshall, the army's chief of staff. Another estimate was put forward by Admiral Leahy, he concluded that it would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work