• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michael Dickinson 11-1 28 April, 2007 In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan? In this essay I will be writing about whether it was right to drop the atomic bombs "little boy" and "Fat Man" on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. These two bombs where dropped by the USA and an estimated 106,000 people died on the impact of the bomb, and by 1950 around 200,000 people had died overall by radiation sickness. The people of Japan had no warning. It was this event that ended WWII and it meant that the USA did not have to risk its army by invading Japan. ...read more.

Middle

The Americans also seemed to want revenge for the treatment of allied P.O.Ws. The Japanese had put allied P.O.Ws in labour camps with awful conditions. They were often malnourished, tortured and many of them died. There are also lots of points for not dropping the bomb. One of these is the huge loss of life in a single blast. 70,000 people died from the first bomb. In the blitz in Britain, which lasted 9 months, only 43,000 people where killed. Some would argue that the USA had no right to sacrifice this amount of civilians for it's own army. The Americans had also said that the Japanese would never surrender this wasn't strictly the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

One eye witness, Father Kleinsorge, describes 20 people he found in a bush that where still alive. "Their faces where wholly burned, their eye sockets hollow, the fluid from their melted eyes had run down their cheeks. Their mouths where pus covered wounds, which they could not bear to stretch enough to admit the spout of a teapot." To conclude I would say that it was not right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, because although they might not have known the full story before they dropped the bomb, they still must have known it would be incredibly inhumane. It think it would have been a lot more acceptable to accept conditional surrender, or even to fight to the last man than to drop the atomic bomb on innocent citizens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    had been totally cut off from Hokkaido to the north and Kyushu (the primary US invasion target). There was only sporadic resistance to the B-29 raids, as the Japanese had to conserve all aviation fuel for when the invasion came and for the Kamikaze crafts and planes.

  2. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    This make these sources bias. The fact that the sources were written by Americans tells us that they are unreliable, although they are speaking the truth, the truth was spoken by Americans and they needed to convince people the dropping the bombs was justified.

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    To this day the long term effect is still evident. Over the span of four months after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, tens of thousands more Japanese died, for they were infected with various illnesses from the amount of radiation they were exposed to.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    Yet still the Japanese didn't surrender. On August 9, 1945 at aproximately 11.02, a weapon, containing a core of 8 kg of plutonium-239, was dropped over Nagasaki's industrial valley. It exploded 469 meters (1,540 feet) above the ground almost midway between the Mitsubishi Steel and Arms Works, in the south,

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    had bombed and sunk "Gunboat Panay", on 13th December 1937 in the Yangtze River. The Americans "immediately protested, demanding reparations. Japan apologized promptly and paid indemnities." Japan had taken over most of Northern and Central China by 1938. This led America to urge to manufactures to put a "moral embargo" on the shipments of aircrafts and other ware attributed material.

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    When the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing an estimated quarter of a million civilians and military personnel as well as causing mass destruction, the war was abruptly brought to a close. Despite the remarkable efficacy of the bombs in forcing Japanese surrender it remains a controversial

  1. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    Right through the war the Americans wanted retribution for the humiliation caused, and as the momentum for revenge increased, the Americans wanted to do more to damage the Japanese. So when the bomb was ready, the majority of people wanted it to be used.

  2. Discussing Japan.

    Japan then takes these raw materials and converts them into the hi-tech products we have right in our very own homes. After it has done this, it exports them all around the world and gets lots of money from it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work