• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michael Dickinson 11-1 28 April, 2007 In August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was it necessary to use the bombs to bring about the defeat of Japan? In this essay I will be writing about whether it was right to drop the atomic bombs "little boy" and "Fat Man" on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. These two bombs where dropped by the USA and an estimated 106,000 people died on the impact of the bomb, and by 1950 around 200,000 people had died overall by radiation sickness. The people of Japan had no warning. It was this event that ended WWII and it meant that the USA did not have to risk its army by invading Japan. ...read more.

Middle

The Americans also seemed to want revenge for the treatment of allied P.O.Ws. The Japanese had put allied P.O.Ws in labour camps with awful conditions. They were often malnourished, tortured and many of them died. There are also lots of points for not dropping the bomb. One of these is the huge loss of life in a single blast. 70,000 people died from the first bomb. In the blitz in Britain, which lasted 9 months, only 43,000 people where killed. Some would argue that the USA had no right to sacrifice this amount of civilians for it's own army. The Americans had also said that the Japanese would never surrender this wasn't strictly the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

One eye witness, Father Kleinsorge, describes 20 people he found in a bush that where still alive. "Their faces where wholly burned, their eye sockets hollow, the fluid from their melted eyes had run down their cheeks. Their mouths where pus covered wounds, which they could not bear to stretch enough to admit the spout of a teapot." To conclude I would say that it was not right to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, because although they might not have known the full story before they dropped the bomb, they still must have known it would be incredibly inhumane. It think it would have been a lot more acceptable to accept conditional surrender, or even to fight to the last man than to drop the atomic bomb on innocent citizens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    To this day the long term effect is still evident. Over the span of four months after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, tens of thousands more Japanese died, for they were infected with various illnesses from the amount of radiation they were exposed to.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    we were talking about dealing with the people who hadn't hesitated at Pearl Harbor to make a sneak attack destroying not only ships but the lives of many America soldiers." The US government used a lot of propaganda as a way to remind Americans of the attack on Pearl Harbor,

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    This make these sources bias. The fact that the sources were written by Americans tells us that they are unreliable, although they are speaking the truth, the truth was spoken by Americans and they needed to convince people the dropping the bombs was justified.

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    As President Truman's biographer David McCullough suggests, "America had not spend $1.8 billion developing a weapon that could end the war only to put it on the shelf..." (as quoted in Parshall 2). Mr. McCullough indicates that the justification of the multi-billion dollar Manhattan project was an influential factor on

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    had bombed and sunk "Gunboat Panay", on 13th December 1937 in the Yangtze River. The Americans "immediately protested, demanding reparations. Japan apologized promptly and paid indemnities." Japan had taken over most of Northern and Central China by 1938. This led America to urge to manufactures to put a "moral embargo" on the shipments of aircrafts and other ware attributed material.

  2. The Blitz

    I personally believe this picture was staged to help boost morale it "shows" trust, unity and confidence in the war. This picture also shows how people are coping with the war and the situation in which they are in, this picture would give a boost to morale as people are smiling and giving the thumbs up!

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    be unlikely that any less than 35% of the invasion force would be killed, this would work out to be 250,000 American dead. This was estimated in August when the Japanese strength on Kyushu was 14 infantry divisions and according to US intelligence reports, there would be another 2,250,000 army

  2. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    Right through the war the Americans wanted retribution for the humiliation caused, and as the momentum for revenge increased, the Americans wanted to do more to damage the Japanese. So when the bomb was ready, the majority of people wanted it to be used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work