• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In February 1943, the German army surrendered at Stalingrad - Was Hitler's interference the main reason for this defeat?

Extracts from this document...


In February 1943, the German Army Surrendered at Stalingrad. Was Hitler's Interference the Main Reason for this Defeat? Explain your Answer. Operation Barbarossa was the German code name for the attack on Russia, and it was certainly set to be a big attack. For Barbarossa Hitler assembled three million troops, 3500 tanks and 2700 aircraft, it was also in anticipation and expectation to be very big, Hitler himself claimed 'When Barbarossa commences, the world will hold its breath'. There were a variety of reasons shown while Hitler spoke of his bold plans to move east and invade the Soviet Empire, both given military and political. Hitler needed Russia's plentiful raw materials to support his army and population, there was lots of oil in the Caucasus and wheat in Ukraine. Hitler also had an obsession with racial ideals, he felt that the Russians were an 'inferior' Slav race, and therefore only fit as slaves for the idealistic Germany Hitler was creating. This feeling of superiority also gave Hitler the confidence as he decided there would be little resistance against the racially superior German's. It was also well established that Hitler loathed the communist power, which contributed to his expansion, as well as his striving for 'living space' (Lebensraum). ...read more.


At this point Hitler was very confident as to the progress being made, and was positively certain that the Russians no longer had any more reserves, but this turned out to be far from the truth. The Russians were in fact building up reserves, and the supply lines remained strong coming form the newly positioned factories in the safety of the east. It was from this confidence that the German attack of the 6th army was aimed straight at Stalingrad to take the city, and as this happened, Stalin ordered 'not a step back', and banned any civilian from leaving the city. Because of the strictness applied by the Russian officers this is therefore what happened, the Russians refused to retreat, and showed determination to hold their ground and not give up that sacred town. It was also a credit that, not only were the soldiers very patriotic, the people of the town pitched in to save their homes. There was also a sense of twisted fate, as the German attack helped the Russians in a way. At the start of the attack on Stalingrad, the Luftwaffe had heavily bombed the city, and so as the rest of the army caught up, it was actually easier for the Soviets to defend the large piles of rubble, especially with the snipers, than to defend actual buildings. ...read more.


In contribution to this, Hitler's well-voiced thoughts of supremacy spurred on a civilian reaction and so 250 000 people of Russia joined the resistance fighters. The Germans, if they captured resistance fighters were known to hang them, this however was not a deterrent but again spurred a further reaction for the Russians to aid their country in whatever ways possible. Hitler's hate of communism meant it blurred his vision and so clouded ability to make sound decisions, it was this that showed how Hitler's views had got the better of him. So, taking all factors into consideration, it is obvious that the Germans had the potential to win all the way, yet the factors shown just denied them of a victory. I still wonder though, if Hitler had put personal feelings aside, and withdrawn from Stalingrad when he should have done, would this have been such a large turning point in the war. In conclusion I feel that it was not solely poor decisions from Hitler that led to the German surrender in February 1943, but was the good strategy of the Russians through Stalin, and patriotism and determination of the Soviet society as one, purely refusing to lose, and give up the city of Stalingrad, bearing the profound name of their much loved dictator leader. Matthew Revill 11R ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Operation Barbarossa - Causes and Consequences

    For the Soviet Union, the battle was of the utmost importance. If they had lost, the country would fall to Hitler and history would be rewritten. The Slavs did not become slaves, Communism/Bolshevism remained intact, and Stalin stayed in power.

  2. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    would be catastrophic, for if it happened, Russia would basically have no chance left. Soviet forces would be completely cut off from their own oil supply (exactly what Germany wanted). Hitler did not want to give up on reaching the Caucasus, he wanted to drive the Soviets as far away

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    This thereby led to the reduced support for the Tsar, which was already weak, and by 1917, few were prepared to help preserve the Tsarist rule. Also, because of the war, the Tsar's personality flaws were even more obvious. This is because of his decision about Alexandria, seen above, and also because of his arrogance in taking over the army.

  2. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    Hitler really trusted his commanders, and politicians as he actually gave them the power to control Germany, Hitler wasn't the head of everything like Stalin or Mussolini were. The major case here was the assassination of Trotsky, leader of the Red Army, by Soviet intelligence, Stalin didn't trust no one but himself and Trotsky was gaining too much power.

  1. Operation Barbarossa and the Russian Offensive.

    The Russians also suffered from muddy periods, tank and truck engines that would not work, the only thing that stopped the Germans was the ever increasing Russian, Ukrainian, Belo-Russian and Georgians. The winter deaths were just a cover up for the fail of appropriate supplies to the front line.

  2. Does Source A adequately explain the reasons for German Surrender at Stalingrad?

    Why do you think that photograph, Source B, was taken? Source B was a photo taken in Stalingrad after the Germans surrendered in 1943. It was meant as a propaganda photo taken by the Russian propaganda party. It was probably taken for a number of reasons.

  1. Explain why Britain was able to continue to hold out against Germany between June ...

    Overall, the fact that Hitler started the Battle of Britain in order to create a smokescreen over Western Europe, shows how he never intended to invade Britain, and therefore in reality that Hitler was not a huge threat to Britain, which allowed it to hold out further as he held back.

  2. GCSE Coursework-Russia’s victory at Stalingrad

    They were very determined to do their bit as many walked 6 miles every day to work, month after month.(S7B) The weather helped them in the winter months as it did against Napoleon, as temperatures were recorded as low as -40.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work