• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In February 1943, the German army surrendered at Stalingrad - Was Hitler's interference the main reason for this defeat?

Extracts from this document...


In February 1943, the German Army Surrendered at Stalingrad. Was Hitler's Interference the Main Reason for this Defeat? Explain your Answer. Operation Barbarossa was the German code name for the attack on Russia, and it was certainly set to be a big attack. For Barbarossa Hitler assembled three million troops, 3500 tanks and 2700 aircraft, it was also in anticipation and expectation to be very big, Hitler himself claimed 'When Barbarossa commences, the world will hold its breath'. There were a variety of reasons shown while Hitler spoke of his bold plans to move east and invade the Soviet Empire, both given military and political. Hitler needed Russia's plentiful raw materials to support his army and population, there was lots of oil in the Caucasus and wheat in Ukraine. Hitler also had an obsession with racial ideals, he felt that the Russians were an 'inferior' Slav race, and therefore only fit as slaves for the idealistic Germany Hitler was creating. This feeling of superiority also gave Hitler the confidence as he decided there would be little resistance against the racially superior German's. It was also well established that Hitler loathed the communist power, which contributed to his expansion, as well as his striving for 'living space' (Lebensraum). ...read more.


At this point Hitler was very confident as to the progress being made, and was positively certain that the Russians no longer had any more reserves, but this turned out to be far from the truth. The Russians were in fact building up reserves, and the supply lines remained strong coming form the newly positioned factories in the safety of the east. It was from this confidence that the German attack of the 6th army was aimed straight at Stalingrad to take the city, and as this happened, Stalin ordered 'not a step back', and banned any civilian from leaving the city. Because of the strictness applied by the Russian officers this is therefore what happened, the Russians refused to retreat, and showed determination to hold their ground and not give up that sacred town. It was also a credit that, not only were the soldiers very patriotic, the people of the town pitched in to save their homes. There was also a sense of twisted fate, as the German attack helped the Russians in a way. At the start of the attack on Stalingrad, the Luftwaffe had heavily bombed the city, and so as the rest of the army caught up, it was actually easier for the Soviets to defend the large piles of rubble, especially with the snipers, than to defend actual buildings. ...read more.


In contribution to this, Hitler's well-voiced thoughts of supremacy spurred on a civilian reaction and so 250 000 people of Russia joined the resistance fighters. The Germans, if they captured resistance fighters were known to hang them, this however was not a deterrent but again spurred a further reaction for the Russians to aid their country in whatever ways possible. Hitler's hate of communism meant it blurred his vision and so clouded ability to make sound decisions, it was this that showed how Hitler's views had got the better of him. So, taking all factors into consideration, it is obvious that the Germans had the potential to win all the way, yet the factors shown just denied them of a victory. I still wonder though, if Hitler had put personal feelings aside, and withdrawn from Stalingrad when he should have done, would this have been such a large turning point in the war. In conclusion I feel that it was not solely poor decisions from Hitler that led to the German surrender in February 1943, but was the good strategy of the Russians through Stalin, and patriotism and determination of the Soviet society as one, purely refusing to lose, and give up the city of Stalingrad, bearing the profound name of their much loved dictator leader. Matthew Revill 11R ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    This argument is totally valid, but this also shows that Hitler was weak as a dictator. He wasn't able to impose his power on organizations and neither on population. His lack of 1) support and 2) order to build a structured nation, absolutely made him stay away from problems.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    link with other topics, like the personality of Nicholas and the Political System. Further still, the other aspects of World War One on Russia can link in with how the 1905 'Revolution' created a build up to the fall of the Romanovs in February 1917.

  1. Operation Barbarossa - Causes and Consequences

    The military losses were huge: 1 Field Marshall 24 generals 2000 officers More than 160,00 German soldiers and up to 50,000 soldiers from other countries allied with Germany (Rumanians, Hungarians etc.) The loss of 25% of Germany's military strength of 1942 in terms of guns, tanks & aircraft.

  2. Why Was Hitler Unable To Defeat Russia?

    One of Stalin's most effective tactics was moving his tank factories from the west, where they could suffer from a German attack, to the east. This formed a town called Tankograd, so if the Germans tried to attack them they would have to cross the Ural mountains.

  1. The Importance of the Battle of Stalingrad.

    It dismissed the notion of the invincibilty of the Wehrmacht and SS soldier on the field of battle.Moreover it indicated the quality of military leadership Hitler could muster.His obsession with the capture of one of the hallmarks of communism which the city of Stalingrad represented by the mere reference to

  2. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    All land was burnt, just to make sure that the Germans couldn't gain access to any of the Russians property or land containing raw materials. This was not forseen by Hitler and so his plans to seize the crops for food and shelter could not go ahead.

  1. Explain why Britain was able to continue to hold out against Germany between June ...

    This is where geography helped to save Britain, as a quick attack could not happen as it is an island. Because of this inability to carry out Blitzkrieg, Goering bombed radar stations and airfields.

  2. Operation Barbarossa and the Russian Offensive.

    The Soviets were so desperate to seek help they signed a treaty with the Polish government. The Germans now owned a section of Russia twice the size of Europe, and it was only the end of July. Many people who have not studied this part of 1941/42 in detail think

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work