• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In it's Intervention in S.E. Asia Between 1950-64 the U.S.A. Was More Concerned To Defend It's Economic Rather Than it's ideologicalInterests. How Far Do You Agree With This?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In it's Intervention in S.E. Asia Between 1950-64 the U.S.A. Was More Concerned To Defend It's Economic Rather Than it's ideological Interests. How Far Do You Agree With This? The U.S.A. had many reasons to intervene S.E. Asia between 1950-64, both economic and ideological. During this period there were four different Presidents who both had different policies concerning military intervention. It is clear that America's priorities changed in this period, from trying to avoid military involvement in the area during the early 1950's, to the gulf of Tonkin resolution being passed in 1964. I will look at the various factors that contributed to the military intervention in an attempt to come to a conclusion. ...read more.

Middle

America gave its support to this corrupt and repressive figure just because he was none Communist. They did not follow the advice of NSC-68 in ensure that the regime was a 'viable alternate' to Communism. From their actions it is plausible to argue that the US was blinded by their fear of the economic effects of the Communism. If the US were acting for the good of the Korean people, they would have never supported Diem in South Korea. The Geneva Agreements also stated that the division of Korea should only be temporary and that national elections to unite the country should be held within two years. ...read more.

Conclusion

If this was true then the President was guilty was being horribly na�ve about the situation. It also would show how the US was in too much a rush to support Diem for the simple reason that he was anti-communist. For many Americans, it was important to support the South Vietnam government at any costs, in order to uphold those freedoms that those in the free world enjoyed and that Communism denied. The US ideology was based the points of; Equality, Freedom of Speech, Democracy & Capitalism. Communism was almost the polar to these ideas. That is was Communism went against what many Americans themselves really believed in. As the major power in the world the US could have seen it as their duty to ensure that they supported Countries unable to stop themselves being taken over by an ideology that repulsed America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Government efforts in Southeast Asia to create harmonious multicultural societies ultimately proved futile. How ...

    In 1961, in a bid to gain the support of the Buddhist majority, U Nu amended the constitution to declare Buddhism as the state religion. He realised that this was politically divisive and added another amendment to guarantee non-Buddhists freedom to worship and spread religion.

  2. Free essay

    Critically examine the factors which accelerated the decolonisation process in Southeast Asia.

    This receptive body of discontentment was ready to act on, identify themselves as a nation and quickly filled the vacuum left by the Japanese surrender. The people were armed with the confidence that they would never be compelled to submit to foreign rule, as well as the means to prevent it from happening.

  1. "Domestic pressure rather than events in Asia governed the USA's intervention in, and conduct ...

    in Asia that added fuel to the fire and made going into Korea necessary for the Americans. The primary event was the "loss of China" in 1949. This had a tremendous effect on the American attitude to the Cold War.

  2. Introduction - US policy to Southeast Asia in general

    'French Liberals were disheartened and embarrassed by their new colonial war' - they pressured the government to grant independence to the Viet Minh, but failed.8 To some, the war had become 'a campaign of national status'.9 Sami Abouzahr believes that Marshall aid funds to France were channelled into the war in Indochina, but Washington did not officially endorse this.

  1. How far was the USA's military involvement in Korea the consequence of a desire ...

    One could argue that Truman's decision to enter the Korean war was simply a way to appease his political opponents who accused him of being 'weak on communism', but this of course is a very limited reason since it does not account for various other events and possible reasons.

  2. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    The economy will also suffer from excessive amounts of bureaucracy and will be slow and cumbersome. Also there will be a lack of innovation, and goods will be of a poor standard because effort will not be rewarded. A doctor could earn the same as a street cleaner, this wouldn't

  1. The Economic "Miracle".

    Miniature guidance systems also helped guid to more precise targets, and known as minutemen. They could travel several thousand miles. US also developed the Polaris submarine missile, which after launched turned on engines after it left water, it was first launched in 1960.

  2. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    These events added tension to the relations between North and South Korea. Another factor in why North Korea invaded South Korea was support from Stalin and Mao. Stalin had already proved that he was interested in North Korea by helping to set up the Korean Communist Party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work