• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the play king Oedipus, to what extent is Oedipus responsible for his downfall and for the tragedy that befell him and his family.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ben Couchman In the play king Oedipus, to what extent is Oedipus responsible for his downfall and for the tragedy that befell him and his family. In both cases king Oedipus is innocent and guilty, innocent with the fact that the gods doomed him before he was born and guilty with the charge of ignorance to the gods and his unstable temperament. I am to write witch of these opposing points of view I favour, for or against but what ever the out come I end with can only be a point of view as the evidence is stacked high on either side of the argument. Some could say that from Oedipus's point of view, he was aggravated to assault, pushed around and presented with dishonour, so much so that he was forced to inflict the greatest revenge a man could enforce upon another by killing the king and all save one of his men. ...read more.

Middle

Still he does realise this and blame all on the gods, it was not the gods of which took his common sense, this he by example has plenty of by defeating the riddle of the sphinx, but no he chooses to be naive, again and so forth condemns him and his family to that of misery. As a follow on to the previous paragraph, of course it was totally normal to marry in those days, in fact it was thought quite odd if you did not, you would have no heir and no legitimate children, but if questioned logically, would it have been better not to have married at all and to have saved yourself from the fate which has obviously been set before you. By a simple act of not marring or as the above not killing in your whole lifetime there would have been no conceivable way of which the prophecy could have materialised. ...read more.

Conclusion

This could maybe be prohibited as she was a queen and had a higher status than other wife's. But you cannot miss that fact that Oedipus failed to restrain and control his own wife when she spoke ill of the gods and clearly defied them by denouncing the power of oracles as lies and deceit. This directly dishonoured Apollo as he is the patron of all oracles and when the god's power is dismissed only bad can come of that person in that life and the next. To conclude , I think there is enough evidence to blame Oedipus for his and his families downfall , through his rash decisions , naivety , paranoia , ignorance and short temper he doomed him self to a life of misery . This is supported by the fact that him blinding himself was not in the prophecy, it was his guilt of knowing what he had done and how easily he could have prevented it that forced the pin into his eyes, not the gods. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. The Pendle Witches - A Story of Witchcraft and Revenge

    Anne Redfearn was found guilty on a further charge. They were all sentenced to be hanged. Margaret Pearson was found guilty of a minor offence and escaped the death sentence, instead being sentenced to punishment in the stocks (devices used in the medieval times as a form of physical punishment involving public humiliation).

  2. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    English Law for hundreds of years, an achievement surely deserving of being called 'great' in itself. Alfred's other main contribution to social change was the educational revolution that he brought about. Primarily, he translated several Latin texts into English, including 'The Consolation of Philosophy' of Boethius, the most popular philosophical

  1. What Did Charlemagne Do While In Power As King?

    in 775 but was only brought to a conclusion in 804 with the definitive conquest and Christianisation of Saxony as an integral part of Charlemagne's realm. In addition, Charlemagne campaigned against the Moors in Muslim Spain, in order to subject them to Christian rule, in 778; in Benevento, in southern

  2. Was the Great War Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs?

    An example of this was in 1916 in Petrograd, only 300 wagon-loads of grain arrived, as opposed to the 1000 they normally received. The effects of war were also felt strongly on the front lines, morale of soldiers was low as the army was mostly comprised of peasants who were

  1. How did han (domain) rivalry contribute to the downfall of the Tokugawa Shogunate?

    The first of these objectives was met when Keiki assumed the powers of the Regent. They immediately decided to reduce the financial burdens on the daimyo by relaxing the sankin kotai system - reducing the time that the damiyo required to stay in Edo and abolishing the hostage system.

  2. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    Study Source E and explain the argument put forward. The argument in source E is by the descendants of the Khoisan against the Miscast Exhibition that was set up in 1996. The Khoisan descendants were furious and outraged about the exhibition and they were not hesitant in venting their feelings.

  1. Louis XIV's fondness of war resulted his downfall

    Or maybe he was regretting that he had been too aggressive, not using peaceful means of agreement more frequently. To answer this we must first go back to 1661, when he started personal rule and examine his priorities for France.

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    From inference this could mean that Louis set a poor example of greed and hunger for more power by entering wars for vanity, Louis then declared his heir must apply himself ?principally? which provides a guess that he may not have applied himself to rule as the country lived in fear of him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work