• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the years 1925-37, successive British Governments felt that Germany had legitimate grievances and this largely explains the policy of appeasement. How far do you agree with these judgements?

Extracts from this document...


In the years 1925-37, successive British Governments felt that Germany had legitimate grievances and this largely explains the policy of appeasement. How far do you agree with these judgements? To an extent the question stated is quite an accurate reflection of the attitudes of many British politicians through the latter half of the 1920's and the early part of 1930's. Many in the British government largely agreed that Germany had legitimate grievances, whether it was issues caused by the treaty of Versailles, or grievances over land disputes or economic problems. However there was also changing interest with British foreign policy and this was because of the difference in opinions between the likes of conservative and liberal governments. It is not fair to completely agree with as this statement as it was clear that after 1934 there were few legitimate grievances left and appeasement was largely implemented out of fear and other factors. For the most part though all actions taken by the British government were in the interest and benefit to Britain. ...read more.


Britain refused to back any movement by France, which goes someway towards appeasement. This was very much a legitimate grievance and does partly explain the policy of appeasement. However, as with Locarno, there is conflicting other factors involving Britain's interests that also explains the lack of action on Britain's part. The British Public disagreed with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, preventing the government from partaking in any pro-Versailles event. Britain also said that they would be no help as they had no troops in France, and politicians viewed it as Germany 'walking into their own backyard'. Again this suggests that there are other reasons as to why a policy of appeasement was adopted. Germany also expressed concerns that she would be unable to pay reparations as well as maintain a realistic economy. This grievance resulted in the young plan, which reduced and spread reparations, allowing Germany's economy to grow. Although this event looks like it was created solely from German grievances, it was generally in the interest of Britain herself, as an economically stronger Germany would prove a stronger trading partner for Britain. ...read more.


Because Britain was a democracy, governments still had to win elections so a pro-war stance would be political suicide, therefore public opinion would have supported and explained a policy of appeasement. However public opinion relates back to German grievances as the public agreed with the German view that the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh. Another argument that could have an effect is the stance that that Great Britain didn't appease. Britain signed the Stresa Front in 1935 with Italy and France, stating that the Treaty of Versailles would not be changed any more than it already had been. However this was then broken by the British, due to a legitimate German grievance, but also a fear on the British part of a European war, as well as the threat from Japan. This then led to appeasement due to a combination of grievances and fear of war. In conclusion, German grievances explain part of the policy for appeasement, however behind each method of appeasement for German Grievances was a parallel contributing factor from Britain's point of view, which could be solved with the same actions as solving these grievances. This therefore suggests that other factors had a larger impact on using a policy of appeasement ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    He added that ''this last possibility, with which ideological considerations would not have to become involved, was closest to Soviet desires." Thenceforth the Soviet Union was negotiating secretly with the Nazis and openly with the British and French at the same time.


    this merely demonstrated Hitler's 'flexibility of method' which was allied to a 'consistency of aim'. Nazi ideology, to which Hitler's personal contribution was greater than anyone else's, anti-Semitism, enjoyed pride of place alongside the utopian vision of Lebensraum conquered and settled by racially pure German Aryans.

  1. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    These statements clearly act in favour of appeasement, expressing that military action against Germanys actions was not necessary as she is clearly retaliating against the unjust nature of the Versailles settlement, remilitarising her troops in a part of her own country was seen as no clear threat towards Britain and France.

  2. Examine the main factors, which led British governments to follow a policy of 'appeasement' ...

    The war had left Britain especially poor. The standard of living had fallen drastically and the citizens had helped to pay for their country's defence. The British government could not afford to go to war. The cost of ammunition, arms, fuel, and soldiers' pay, was too much.

  1. Was appeasement the only option open to Britain in 1938-1939?

    The policy began to gain much criticism from powerful members of the Commons such as Churchill who saw the concessions given to Germany in order to avoid war as simply giving in to the aggression of Hitler's brutal regime. "All that the 'intense exertions of the Prime Minister' had been

  2. How far has nationalism changed over the last hundred years?

    They isolated themselves from other leading powers to unite against a common enemy: Britain, in terms of the naval race. "The smallest slur upon his own unit, or any implied praise of a rival organisation, fills him with uneasiness, which he can relieve only by making some sharp retort"iii This

  1. Explain why the attitude of the British Governments towards Germany changed in the years ...

    This meant that although George wanted to retain a balance of power he still needed to comply with the public opinion to stay in government, therefore he did not object to the term that the defeated powers (Germany, Russia) would be excluded from the treaty formation and signing, and no

  2. How realistic are POW films?

    forms' all of which would contribute to an escape of a group of people. This is one aspect which I have found to be realistic throughout all three films. I know that escape plans are formulated like this because in all of the personal accounts I have read by surviving

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work