• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the years 1925-37, successive British Governments felt that Germany had legitimate grievances and this largely explains the policy of appeasement. How far do you agree with these judgements?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the years 1925-37, successive British Governments felt that Germany had legitimate grievances and this largely explains the policy of appeasement. How far do you agree with these judgements? To an extent the question stated is quite an accurate reflection of the attitudes of many British politicians through the latter half of the 1920's and the early part of 1930's. Many in the British government largely agreed that Germany had legitimate grievances, whether it was issues caused by the treaty of Versailles, or grievances over land disputes or economic problems. However there was also changing interest with British foreign policy and this was because of the difference in opinions between the likes of conservative and liberal governments. It is not fair to completely agree with as this statement as it was clear that after 1934 there were few legitimate grievances left and appeasement was largely implemented out of fear and other factors. For the most part though all actions taken by the British government were in the interest and benefit to Britain. ...read more.

Middle

Britain refused to back any movement by France, which goes someway towards appeasement. This was very much a legitimate grievance and does partly explain the policy of appeasement. However, as with Locarno, there is conflicting other factors involving Britain's interests that also explains the lack of action on Britain's part. The British Public disagreed with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, preventing the government from partaking in any pro-Versailles event. Britain also said that they would be no help as they had no troops in France, and politicians viewed it as Germany 'walking into their own backyard'. Again this suggests that there are other reasons as to why a policy of appeasement was adopted. Germany also expressed concerns that she would be unable to pay reparations as well as maintain a realistic economy. This grievance resulted in the young plan, which reduced and spread reparations, allowing Germany's economy to grow. Although this event looks like it was created solely from German grievances, it was generally in the interest of Britain herself, as an economically stronger Germany would prove a stronger trading partner for Britain. ...read more.

Conclusion

Because Britain was a democracy, governments still had to win elections so a pro-war stance would be political suicide, therefore public opinion would have supported and explained a policy of appeasement. However public opinion relates back to German grievances as the public agreed with the German view that the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh. Another argument that could have an effect is the stance that that Great Britain didn't appease. Britain signed the Stresa Front in 1935 with Italy and France, stating that the Treaty of Versailles would not be changed any more than it already had been. However this was then broken by the British, due to a legitimate German grievance, but also a fear on the British part of a European war, as well as the threat from Japan. This then led to appeasement due to a combination of grievances and fear of war. In conclusion, German grievances explain part of the policy for appeasement, however behind each method of appeasement for German Grievances was a parallel contributing factor from Britain's point of view, which could be solved with the same actions as solving these grievances. This therefore suggests that other factors had a larger impact on using a policy of appeasement ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    The propaganda machine that Hitler adopted, however, was perhaps the most important device at his disposal. With it he was able to successfully undermine his opponent's will to resist. This played a part in the Austrian crisis which caused Schuscnigg to call a plebiscite after being bullied by the Nazi ministers.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    For the same reason Hitler put an end to regular cabinet meetings and insisted on dealing with ministers singly, so that they could not combine against him. 'I have an old principle,' he told Ludecke: 'only to say what must be said to him who must know it, and only when he must know it.'

  1. Explain why the attitude of the British Governments towards Germany changed in the years ...

    This meant that although George wanted to retain a balance of power he still needed to comply with the public opinion to stay in government, therefore he did not object to the term that the defeated powers (Germany, Russia) would be excluded from the treaty formation and signing, and no

  2. How realistic are POW films?

    In source A1 it describes how between three men 'the overcoat was our only bed clothing.' further emphasising the point that there was a shortage of clothing. In Escape to Victory the football team have their own showers and their own football kit which, under the circumstances of the time would have been impossible.

  1. Apeasement Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the ...

    It was indeed a harsh peace, which did not completely satisfy the needs of all countries involved. Many feel it was essentially an opportunity for France to impose harsh repercussions on Germany for the destruction of her country. The main provisions of the League were The German army was to be limited to 100,000 and conscription banned.

  2. Stalin had fully consolidated his dictorship by 1935."With referene to the years 1929 to ...

    New factories were built-the large automobile factories at Moscow, the tractor plans at Stalingrad, the steel plants at Magnitogorsk and Kuznetsk Basin, and the hydro-electric stations at Dnieper were all built in this period. The Ural area was developed as an important industrial region.

  1. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    It was indeed a harsh peace, which did not completely satisfy the needs of all countries involved. Many feel it was essentially an opportunity for France to impose harsh repercussions on Germany for the destruction of her country. The main provisions of the League were The German army was to be limited to 100,000 and conscription banned.

  2. "An Honourable Policy Pursued by Honourable Men"-Is This a Fair Assessment of the Policy ...

    Chamberlain put his faith in someone he knew, Lord Halifax, to partake in diplomatic talks with Hitler in Germany instead of Eden. Although this was undermining Eden, it could be argued that without full support, a government is essentially weak.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work