• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the years 195360, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather than coexistence. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


?In the years 1953?60, President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather than coexistence.? How far do you agree with this view? In the years 1953-1960 it can be argued that President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation. Confrontational foreign policy, covert operations of the CIA and the aggressive build-up of nuclear arms seemingly confirm this interpretation. However, the equally hostile Soviet build-up of arms and provocative military action within Eastern Europe highlight the unstable international context that characterised Eisenhower?s presidency; whilst his support of improving superpower relations through ?summit diplomacy? suggest Eisenhower was more interested in ensuring coexistence than confrontation. Therefore, Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was a measured and necessary response to a volatile cold war climate and thus was inevitably based on measured confrontation. With the election of Eisenhower as US president in 1952, US foreign policy became increasingly confrontational towards the Soviet Union. ...read more.


service in 1955 on 24 hour alert, this meant the US could deliver a nuclear weapon with 1000 times the destructive capability of the A-bomb on the Soviet Union in only a couple of hours. In addition, the Atlas and Minutemen ICBM?s and Polaris SLBM?s had come into service by 1959, the US could now strike the USSR from grounded nuclear bunkers. The destructive capabilities of America?s nuclear arsenal, in conjunction with nuclear ?brinkmanship? and ?massive retaliation? is clear evidence that Eisenhower?s presidency was particularly confrontational towards the Soviet Union. However, it can also be argued that the actions of the USA during the arms race were an attempt to maintain parity with the Soviet Union and thus deter a potential nuclear strike. Despite the rhetoric of ?peaceful coexistence? the Soviet Union developed its own H-Bomb by August 1953, developed its intercontinental bomber the ?Tu20 Bear? by 1956, started the ?space race? by launching the satellite ?Sputnik? in October 1956 and developed the first ICBM in May 1957. ...read more.


Nevertheless the Paris Peace Accords in 1960 abruptly ended when Khrushchev stormed out following revelations of a successful shooting down of a U2 spy plane over Russia. Despite the undercurrent of distrust and suspicion which persisted between the superpowers, Eisenhower took great efforts to improve superpower relations and therefore his Presidency can be seen to be characterised more by coexistence rather than confrontation. In conclusion, President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was an attempt to ensure coexistence between the superpowers with the use of confrontational diplomacy. Eisenhower?s ?face to face diplomacy? achieved a ?thawing? in relations between the superpowers, whilst the actions of the Soviets in Eastern Europe showed the rhetoric of ?massive retaliation? was more threat than fact. The build-up of arms was in response to both popular opinion and the Soviet nuclear threat. Although the covert operations of the CIA highlights a particularly reckless element of Eisenhower?s policy making. Overall however, the confrontational policy of Eisenhower was measured and an attempt to ensure coexistence through aggressive deterrent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    However, new developments in nuclear technology meant that MAD was soon overtaken. D�tente D�tente is French for 'relaxation'. It is used to describe the period between 1968 and 1979, when tensions between the superpowers were more 'relaxed'. What reasons did the superpowers have for d�tente?

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    The deployment of the B-29s established the US Strategic Air Command in the UK, and the arrival in Britain of "the atomic bombers" was widely publicized. The threat of nuclear retaliation was now made explicit, which not only raised the stakes but the long-term resentment too.

  1. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    By February of 1917, the workers and soldiers had had enough. Riots broke out in St. Petersburg, then called Petrograd, and the garrison there mutinied. Workers soviets were set up, and the Duma approved the establishment of a Provisional Government to attempt to restore order in the capital.

  2. In the years 1953-1960 was president Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy based on confrontation rather ...

    Dulles, talked of ?rolling back? communism and the liberation of Eastern Europe from the evils of communism. This persuaded Eisenhower to adopt a hard line approach to foreign policy known as ?New Look?, which meant the USA would use military means to contain communism, and would have a policy of ?massive retaliation? against communist aggression.

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    on its own; therefore, with this notion in mind, the Soviets saw negotiation and conciliation where necessary as a better way to deal with the West than with aggression. This is perhaps why the Soviet Union finally pushed Kim Il Sung, the North Korean leader, to agree to a ceasefire

  2. In the years 1953-60, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather ...

    and U.S.S.R. didn?t have trustworthy relations by 1960. Wherever Eisenhower?s diplomacy was headed, by 1960 relations with the Soviet Union seem to be much more incisive than in 1953, while no real agreement on peaceful coexistence was reached in the period 1953-60.

  1. (Sources) - How far do you agree with the view that Reagans actions ...

    science fiction so it can be argued that the SDI programme wasn?t significant in pressurising the Soviet Union but rather unnecessarily expended enormous amounts of dollars which could?ve been put to better use. Regardless of the limited successes of the SDI programme, Reagan?s approach was strengthened by the support he

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    The constant shrift between restricted and relaxed censorship was a long-term problem persistent throughout Russian history. Previous attempts of totalitarian rule had proved to be of little benefit to the state; in certain instances it furthered dissidents towards the government by the populace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work