• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the years 195360, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather than coexistence. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?In the years 1953?60, President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather than coexistence.? How far do you agree with this view? In the years 1953-1960 it can be argued that President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation. Confrontational foreign policy, covert operations of the CIA and the aggressive build-up of nuclear arms seemingly confirm this interpretation. However, the equally hostile Soviet build-up of arms and provocative military action within Eastern Europe highlight the unstable international context that characterised Eisenhower?s presidency; whilst his support of improving superpower relations through ?summit diplomacy? suggest Eisenhower was more interested in ensuring coexistence than confrontation. Therefore, Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was a measured and necessary response to a volatile cold war climate and thus was inevitably based on measured confrontation. With the election of Eisenhower as US president in 1952, US foreign policy became increasingly confrontational towards the Soviet Union. ...read more.

Middle

service in 1955 on 24 hour alert, this meant the US could deliver a nuclear weapon with 1000 times the destructive capability of the A-bomb on the Soviet Union in only a couple of hours. In addition, the Atlas and Minutemen ICBM?s and Polaris SLBM?s had come into service by 1959, the US could now strike the USSR from grounded nuclear bunkers. The destructive capabilities of America?s nuclear arsenal, in conjunction with nuclear ?brinkmanship? and ?massive retaliation? is clear evidence that Eisenhower?s presidency was particularly confrontational towards the Soviet Union. However, it can also be argued that the actions of the USA during the arms race were an attempt to maintain parity with the Soviet Union and thus deter a potential nuclear strike. Despite the rhetoric of ?peaceful coexistence? the Soviet Union developed its own H-Bomb by August 1953, developed its intercontinental bomber the ?Tu20 Bear? by 1956, started the ?space race? by launching the satellite ?Sputnik? in October 1956 and developed the first ICBM in May 1957. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless the Paris Peace Accords in 1960 abruptly ended when Khrushchev stormed out following revelations of a successful shooting down of a U2 spy plane over Russia. Despite the undercurrent of distrust and suspicion which persisted between the superpowers, Eisenhower took great efforts to improve superpower relations and therefore his Presidency can be seen to be characterised more by coexistence rather than confrontation. In conclusion, President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was an attempt to ensure coexistence between the superpowers with the use of confrontational diplomacy. Eisenhower?s ?face to face diplomacy? achieved a ?thawing? in relations between the superpowers, whilst the actions of the Soviets in Eastern Europe showed the rhetoric of ?massive retaliation? was more threat than fact. The build-up of arms was in response to both popular opinion and the Soviet nuclear threat. Although the covert operations of the CIA highlights a particularly reckless element of Eisenhower?s policy making. Overall however, the confrontational policy of Eisenhower was measured and an attempt to ensure coexistence through aggressive deterrent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    No mention was made of sharing information about the bomb, or of future cooperation to avoid an arms race. Yet the very nature of the new weapon proved a mixed blessing, making it as much a source of provocation as of diplomatic leverage.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    America, on the other hand, emerged from the War with an economic boom and they used this superiority to influence Western European countries. There was a series of menacing speeches and claims made by prominent Western figures which greatly influenced the USA in its attitude, at the same time provoking the USSR and accusing them.

  1. The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you ...

    H.G Koenigsberger argues that the rebellion was 'resistance by a privileged group for both political and religious reasons to an aggressive, centralizing monarchy'5. The argument that fighting commenced due in part to the perceived increasing political power of Ferdinand II is supported by Bonny who argues that Ferdinand and his

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Thus, although the US had made compromises, in public it was Khrushchev who had been forced to back down. Why did the Cuban Missiles Crisis end like this? * Kennedy realised that he had to make a stand. * Khrushchev realised that he had gone too far.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    German forces became weak and a lot of USSR's occupied territories were free.[1- Ture Linne Ericsen, Vsemirnaya Istoriya s 1850 goda do nashih deni, printed in Norway by Norbok, Gjovik 1994, p.310] This win has moved USSR to the superpower position.

  2. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    The peasants, who comprised the bulk of the Russian army, were less enthusiastic about the war, but were willing to fight nonetheless. Although the steady German advances and massive Russian losses in the War did not significantly dampen the jingoistic fervour of the educated classes, they did create discontent throughout the country.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Tal al-Zaatar contained about 2,000 Palestinian guerrillas intermixed with a civilian population of roughly 15,000 facing them were some 4,000 Lebanese Front militiamen. The Lebanese Front were supported and advised in the siege by the Lebanese and Syrian armies; Israeli advisers were also present.

  2. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    on its own; therefore, with this notion in mind, the Soviets saw negotiation and conciliation where necessary as a better way to deal with the West than with aggression. This is perhaps why the Soviet Union finally pushed Kim Il Sung, the North Korean leader, to agree to a ceasefire

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work