• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the years 195360, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather than coexistence. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?In the years 1953?60, President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather than coexistence.? How far do you agree with this view? In the years 1953-1960 it can be argued that President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation. Confrontational foreign policy, covert operations of the CIA and the aggressive build-up of nuclear arms seemingly confirm this interpretation. However, the equally hostile Soviet build-up of arms and provocative military action within Eastern Europe highlight the unstable international context that characterised Eisenhower?s presidency; whilst his support of improving superpower relations through ?summit diplomacy? suggest Eisenhower was more interested in ensuring coexistence than confrontation. Therefore, Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was a measured and necessary response to a volatile cold war climate and thus was inevitably based on measured confrontation. With the election of Eisenhower as US president in 1952, US foreign policy became increasingly confrontational towards the Soviet Union. ...read more.

Middle

service in 1955 on 24 hour alert, this meant the US could deliver a nuclear weapon with 1000 times the destructive capability of the A-bomb on the Soviet Union in only a couple of hours. In addition, the Atlas and Minutemen ICBM?s and Polaris SLBM?s had come into service by 1959, the US could now strike the USSR from grounded nuclear bunkers. The destructive capabilities of America?s nuclear arsenal, in conjunction with nuclear ?brinkmanship? and ?massive retaliation? is clear evidence that Eisenhower?s presidency was particularly confrontational towards the Soviet Union. However, it can also be argued that the actions of the USA during the arms race were an attempt to maintain parity with the Soviet Union and thus deter a potential nuclear strike. Despite the rhetoric of ?peaceful coexistence? the Soviet Union developed its own H-Bomb by August 1953, developed its intercontinental bomber the ?Tu20 Bear? by 1956, started the ?space race? by launching the satellite ?Sputnik? in October 1956 and developed the first ICBM in May 1957. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless the Paris Peace Accords in 1960 abruptly ended when Khrushchev stormed out following revelations of a successful shooting down of a U2 spy plane over Russia. Despite the undercurrent of distrust and suspicion which persisted between the superpowers, Eisenhower took great efforts to improve superpower relations and therefore his Presidency can be seen to be characterised more by coexistence rather than confrontation. In conclusion, President Eisenhower?s cold war diplomacy was an attempt to ensure coexistence between the superpowers with the use of confrontational diplomacy. Eisenhower?s ?face to face diplomacy? achieved a ?thawing? in relations between the superpowers, whilst the actions of the Soviets in Eastern Europe showed the rhetoric of ?massive retaliation? was more threat than fact. The build-up of arms was in response to both popular opinion and the Soviet nuclear threat. Although the covert operations of the CIA highlights a particularly reckless element of Eisenhower?s policy making. Overall however, the confrontational policy of Eisenhower was measured and an attempt to ensure coexistence through aggressive deterrent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Evaluate the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower.

    on the issues of Senator Joseph McCarthy's hunt for communists and the Supreme Court decision in the case of brown v. board of education of Topeka, Kansas. Both historians seem to be in general agreement that Eisenhower erred in his treatment of these two issues, and that the contemporary view

  2. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    on its own; therefore, with this notion in mind, the Soviets saw negotiation and conciliation where necessary as a better way to deal with the West than with aggression. This is perhaps why the Soviet Union finally pushed Kim Il Sung, the North Korean leader, to agree to a ceasefire

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    for the creation of an all-German government out of these in West and East Germany arguing that elections must be held before the creation of a German government not afterwards and Dulles walked out of the Geneva Conference as he was concerned that the agreement confirmed communism in North Vietnam.

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    * Eisenhower ? blamed ?Soviet duplicity? for the summits failure. Yet recognised the potential for a future agreement. Hope was ?badly blurred by the Soviets, (but) at least the outlines of the picture remained? * Khrushchev ? Geneva had seen his policy of ?Peaceful Coexistence? fail to secure any concessions from the West.

  1. In the years 1953-60, President Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy was based on confrontation rather ...

    and U.S.S.R. didn?t have trustworthy relations by 1960. Wherever Eisenhower?s diplomacy was headed, by 1960 relations with the Soviet Union seem to be much more incisive than in 1953, while no real agreement on peaceful coexistence was reached in the period 1953-60.

  2. (Sources) - How far do you agree with the view that Reagans actions ...

    received from Thatcher; she enabled him to deploy nuclear missiles in Europe, as having US nuclear missiles based in Britain was of vital importance in putting pressure on the Soviet Union since it was tangible evidence of Reagan?s new anti-communist approach.

  1. In the years 1953-1960 was president Eisenhowers cold war diplomacy based on confrontation rather ...

    Dulles, talked of ?rolling back? communism and the liberation of Eastern Europe from the evils of communism. This persuaded Eisenhower to adopt a hard line approach to foreign policy known as ?New Look?, which meant the USA would use military means to contain communism, and would have a policy of ?massive retaliation? against communist aggression.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    live well. You cannot put theory into your soup or Marxism into your clothes.?[6] The ?thaw? was a reformation of the ideological constraints, that communism had previously put on the Russian people. Previous rule restricted the development of civil reform: working conditions and general civil liberty remained severely undeveloped.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work