• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In two world wars, the richer countries mobilized their economiesmore successfully than others. How may we explain this? Identify and account for the most significant deviations from this rule.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In two world wars, the richer countries mobilized their economies more successfully than others. How may we explain this? Identify and account for the most significant deviations from this rule. It is widely believed that military dominance was one of the key factors that led to the success of the allied powers in the World Wars. In both the wars, the coalition that won no doubt had a superior military strength. They fielded far greater number of soldiers and military equipment. In fact in World War I, the Allied army outnumbered the Central Powers by more than 60% and fielded almost double the amount of military equipment. In World War II the Allied armies fielded about 40% more soldiers and the military equipment advantage was similar to that of World War I .But a more in depth study of the economics of the wars would reveal that the ability of the nations to mobilize their economic resources for the purpose of war played an equally important role in the outcome of the war. The world mobilizing literally means 'The act of assembling, equipping, and preparing military and naval forces for active hostilities' i.e. to assemble and marshal economic resources for the purpose of war. ...read more.

Middle

To cover the other $167.2 billion, the Treasury Department also expanded its bond program, creating the famous "war bonds". The American economy expanded at an unprecedented rate between 1941 and 1945. The gross national product of the U.S., as measured in constant dollars, grew from $88.6 billion in 1939 to $135 billion in 1944. War-related production skyrocketed from just 2 percent of GNP to 40 percent in 1943 (Milward, 63). Table shows, output in many American manufacturing sectors increased enormously from 1939 to 1944, and the height of war production in many industries. Indices of American Manufacturing Output (1939 = 100) 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 Aircraft 245 630 1706 2842 2805 Munitions 140 423 2167 3803 2033 Shipbuilding 159 375 1091 1815 1710 Aluminium 126 189 318 561 474 Rubber 109 144 152 202 206 Steel 131 171 190 202 197 Source: Milward On the other hand countries with a low pre war level of output struggled to mobilize a high proportion of their economic resources for the war. Most of the poor countries had a large amount of their resources locked up in low productive subsistence agriculture. During war times, mobilization began to take resources away from agriculture particularly manpower. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pre 1914, economic factors were not as important as during the period of the great wars due to the inability of the government to mobilize the resources from industry and agriculture because too many people were required to work in the fields and workshops just to produce enough to feed the population, and it was economically unfeasible for the government officials to count, tax, and channel them into war. II The period between the great wars was unique. The dependence of military performance upon and pre economic development specifically holds true for this era in history. After World War II, the economic factors might have lost their significance again. This may be best summed up by the following. 'Since 1945 the economic factors in warfare may have lost significance again. This is because after the advent of nuclear weapons any rich country however small or any large country however poor could acquire devastating military force for a few billion dollars. Hence the marshalling of economic resources may have played a much more vital role in the outcome of the two world wars than was likely in any period before or since.' Source: Harrison, Mark. 2004. "Why the Rich Won: Economic Mobilization and Economic Development in Two World Wars. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    The development of the international economy in the period 1945-2000 favoured rich countries at ...

    4 star(s)

    The highly homogenized uniform remedy of development proliferated Western ideals and thus the abandonment of traditional structures. Furthermore, WB operations were subverted to US Cold War policies in the 1970s as resources were mobilised as a vehicle for militant US policy aboard.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Berlin would also be divided into four sectors. * Poland would be given land in the west, which would be taken from Germany and would lose land to the USSR. Stalin agreed that some members of the Polish government in exile (the London Poles) would be allowed to join the Polish government that he had set up (the Lublin Poles).

  1. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    The anniversary is a celebration of freedom and victory and 'commemoration' so for a British newspaper, the British public is not going to want to hear about D-Day's flaws. Secondly, this is secondary evidence. This means the writer wasn't there to actually see what happened- he/she is just going on the basis of what they have heard and researched.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    Roosevelt, met at conferences in Yalta and Potsdam to discuss and agree upon the peace and reconstruction of Germany. Stalin was greedy in the division of Germany and refused to give up territory gained in the War. The major difference between the two countries, was that the USSR was communist and the United States was a country of democratic capitalists.

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    Women's need for work was nursed along by the media as well as the public. "A rapidly expanding war economy absorbed most of the reserve labor force," (307) yet it still was not enough, the economy demanded a larger work force.

  2. Armed forces.

    Amritsar massacre in India; Arab rebellion in Egypt; IRA formed; German African colonies acquired; ANC demonstrates against pass laws Nancy Astor the first Woman MP Treaty of Versaille; League of Nations formed; Flu epidemic Rutherford splits the atom 1920 Mahatma Gandhi becomes leader of Congress; British East Africa becomes Kenya; Palestine becomes British mandate Prohibition in US (1920 - 33)

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    famous 1947 article on containment, Russian diplomacy "moves along the prescribed path, like a persistent toy automobile, wound up and headed in a given direction, stopping only when it meets some unanswerable force." Soviet subservience to a universal, religious creed ruled out even the possibility of mutual concessions, since even

  2. American History.

    The types of families included... Indian - dramatic changes for the Indians caused led to bands being reduced? in numbers by disease and the creation of new units. Old customs were often changed under pressure from European authorities and new circumstances, and extended families became more important b/c of the high mortality rates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work