• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways and to what purposes does Richard II engage with contemporary political thought (circa 16th Century)?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways and to what purposes does Richard II engage with contemporary political thought (circa 16th Century)? When Richard II was first performed in 1595, it would have had heavy political impact especially upon thoughts on the issues of Kingship. Shakespeare drew upon the feelings originally penned by the likes of Erasmus (highly respected at the time on points of Kingship and G. Buchanan (The Powers of the Crown in Scotland). The public's attention had been drawn to the position of a King and his power after the reign of Henry VIII who detached himself and England from the Catholic church in 1532. This act provoked thought amongst literary types, who recalled that the King had been intended as the ruler by appointment of God, and so should conform to the church. The power and inherent goodness of Kings was questioned, and such writers show this. Erasmus, being a humanist, concentrated heavily in The Education of a Christian Prince (1516) upon the removal of celestial qualities which had been bestowed upon the title of "King" through the ages. ...read more.

Middle

Religion is also brought into this power equation, both by contemporary theologians such as John Calvin (who said that "the ordinance of God [is to be set against the rule of] the outraging licentiousnesse of Kinges"), and by the play itself. God is argued by Richard to be the divine decider of kings, as part of the Mythology of Kings, and Gaunt ("God's is the quarrel; for God's substitute, [hath] caused his death") and the church (represented by the Bishop of Carlisle) agrees. Bolingbroke and his followers are opposed to this (joined by Gaunt in his "inspired prophet" speech), as they believe the King should be a man of the people (like Bolingbroke), so that he can take care of the country well. After the rebellion against Richard II, the head of state was more careful not to incite such feelings, for example through church indoctrination (Elizabethan Church Homilies were anti-rebellion), and so such pro-monarchist characters as Richard represent such views and we are shown the error of their ways (seemingly) by the fates which befall them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Elyot describes the gardener as "wise and cunning" because he needs to be selectively discriminating in his "lopping away [of superfluous branches] that bearing boughs may live" [III.4 lines 63-4], that is to say, he must be harsh on some, but only those who are not needed and are holding back the more useful. This idea seems a common one at the time, and is put forward using another popular image of the body politic by George Buchanan, who says that a king should act fairly "by nourishing and gently assisting the weakened members and by diminishing the fullness and excess of that which does no good". By such close comparison with contemporary sources, the changing politics in the play can be seen, and this also gives us perhaps an insight into Shakespeare's own view of monarchy at the time. The issues attached) to power are complex and ongoing, but Shakespeare shows some of the problems that it can cause, while using a medium that is much more accessible to the general public than the writings of a certain Dutch humanist thinker. As a politically influential play, it could be said to have succeeded as it challenged many commonly held views, without being too extreme as to be dismissed as radical. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    his intentions and the need of the state, the reform was successful. It can be argued that the reform had many successes, and that it did liberate the serfs in many ways. Supporters of Alexander, such as historian M.S.Anderson, believes the emancipation decree to be, ?the greatest single liberating measure

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    BBC History-State-Society-Monarchs and Leaders King Henry II (Visited 17/12/2002) http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/state/monarchs_leaders/henry_ii.shtml 24. The National Archives Learning Curve Education on the Internet & Teaching History Online Henry II http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/MEDhenryII.htm [Visited 11/12/2002] 25. Adams Z hiu45a@bangor.ac.uk School of History and Welsh History - University of Wales Bangor page 10-11 http://www.orb.rhodes.edu/Wales/H3H03/h3h03r02.htm [visited 24/10/2002] 26.

  1. The Reformation was the intellectual movement in Western Europe in the 16th century which ...

    To get married, baptize a child (needed in order to go to heaven), or bury someone (soul could only go to heaven if buried on church Holy Ground), one had to pay money to the church. King Henry VIII realized this and chose to capitalize on this with his greed;

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    After being told by Margaret that 'Thy woes will make [her words] sharp, and pierce like mine,' Elizabeth's cursing ability is reflected in her conversation with Richard. Almost immediately, Elizabeth simply says to Richard: 'I have no more sons of the royal blood For thee to slaughter.

  1. Discuss the relationship between Richard II and its source 'How kyng Richarde the seconde....'

    His message can be contradictory, for he does see his murder as 'causeles' (l. 116) and his opponents as 'traytrous' (l. 114). Yet the overwhelming force of his own argument is that his reign was characterised by 'vices' (ll. 2 & 34), and that he 'fell / to make the living wise' (l.23).

  2. Analyse the ways in which Shakespeare dramatises his exploration of the idea of leadership ...

    However, the prologue notes that the audience will have to use their imaginations to make the play come to life. By the end of the prologue, the audience was expecting a fantastic play. Therefore, it was a great success, maximising anticipation for the forthcoming play.

  1. The Prince.

    James asked, a hint of venom in his voice. The prince had invited Hailey for the last 5 years, however she'd never come. Hailey and the prince had had the prince's longest relationship - 28 days, however the prince had decided to end it and he still didn't know why.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    We can see that the rich have a life of luxury and ease while the servants, who are poor, have to do all the hard work. Furthermore, the rich defend their privilege by saying that it's the natural way for the world to operate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work