• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways and to what purposes does Richard II engage with contemporary political thought (circa 16th Century)?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways and to what purposes does Richard II engage with contemporary political thought (circa 16th Century)? When Richard II was first performed in 1595, it would have had heavy political impact especially upon thoughts on the issues of Kingship. Shakespeare drew upon the feelings originally penned by the likes of Erasmus (highly respected at the time on points of Kingship and G. Buchanan (The Powers of the Crown in Scotland). The public's attention had been drawn to the position of a King and his power after the reign of Henry VIII who detached himself and England from the Catholic church in 1532. This act provoked thought amongst literary types, who recalled that the King had been intended as the ruler by appointment of God, and so should conform to the church. The power and inherent goodness of Kings was questioned, and such writers show this. Erasmus, being a humanist, concentrated heavily in The Education of a Christian Prince (1516) upon the removal of celestial qualities which had been bestowed upon the title of "King" through the ages. ...read more.

Middle

Religion is also brought into this power equation, both by contemporary theologians such as John Calvin (who said that "the ordinance of God [is to be set against the rule of] the outraging licentiousnesse of Kinges"), and by the play itself. God is argued by Richard to be the divine decider of kings, as part of the Mythology of Kings, and Gaunt ("God's is the quarrel; for God's substitute, [hath] caused his death") and the church (represented by the Bishop of Carlisle) agrees. Bolingbroke and his followers are opposed to this (joined by Gaunt in his "inspired prophet" speech), as they believe the King should be a man of the people (like Bolingbroke), so that he can take care of the country well. After the rebellion against Richard II, the head of state was more careful not to incite such feelings, for example through church indoctrination (Elizabethan Church Homilies were anti-rebellion), and so such pro-monarchist characters as Richard represent such views and we are shown the error of their ways (seemingly) by the fates which befall them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Elyot describes the gardener as "wise and cunning" because he needs to be selectively discriminating in his "lopping away [of superfluous branches] that bearing boughs may live" [III.4 lines 63-4], that is to say, he must be harsh on some, but only those who are not needed and are holding back the more useful. This idea seems a common one at the time, and is put forward using another popular image of the body politic by George Buchanan, who says that a king should act fairly "by nourishing and gently assisting the weakened members and by diminishing the fullness and excess of that which does no good". By such close comparison with contemporary sources, the changing politics in the play can be seen, and this also gives us perhaps an insight into Shakespeare's own view of monarchy at the time. The issues attached) to power are complex and ongoing, but Shakespeare shows some of the problems that it can cause, while using a medium that is much more accessible to the general public than the writings of a certain Dutch humanist thinker. As a politically influential play, it could be said to have succeeded as it challenged many commonly held views, without being too extreme as to be dismissed as radical. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    As such, the effects of the emancipation itself were not great, and in fact meant that many peasants were unhappy as they had been burdened with debt and were still not in possession of full citizens rights. As such, it can be argued that the title of Tsar Liberator would

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    30. Ibid 31. Bishop Stubbs 32. The Constitutions of Clarendon 1164, pages 1-5 http://www.britainexpress.com/History/medieval/clarendon.htm (Visited 16/12/2002) 33. The Constitutions of Clarendon 1164, pages 1-5 http://www.britainexpress.com/History/medieval/clarendon.htm (Visited 16/12/2002) 34. Ibid [visited 16/12/2002] 35. Morris , 'Life of St Thomas' pp114 sqq 36. Mooney K ' School of History and Welsh History'- University of Wales Bangor page 10-11 http://www.orb.rhodes.edu/Wales/H3H03/h3h03r02.htm [visited 24/10/2002] 37.

  1. The Reformation was the intellectual movement in Western Europe in the 16th century which ...

    To get married, baptize a child (needed in order to go to heaven), or bury someone (soul could only go to heaven if buried on church Holy Ground), one had to pay money to the church. King Henry VIII realized this and chose to capitalize on this with his greed;

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    'O thou well skilled in curses, stay awhile, / And teach me how to curse mine enemies.' Her role at this point in the play is to take over Margaret's power since she has risen and fallen, all that is left for Elizabeth to do is to curse like Margaret.

  1. Analyse the ways in which Shakespeare dramatises his exploration of the idea of leadership ...

    However, the prologue notes that the audience will have to use their imaginations to make the play come to life. By the end of the prologue, the audience was expecting a fantastic play. Therefore, it was a great success, maximising anticipation for the forthcoming play.

  2. The Prince.

    I suppose that you could say that it was organised chaos, but without the organised bit in it. Nothing was organised when the prince was involved. The prince was obviously nervous - he kept on consulting the stars to see what time it was (we're talking about the 15th century

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    She is saying that it isn't the natural way of the world at all. By leaving England she can start a new life abroad where she will be able to have a better standard of living. The poet has explained some of the background to this poem.

  2. Discuss the relationship between Richard II and its source 'How kyng Richarde the seconde....'

    His message can be contradictory, for he does see his murder as 'causeles' (l. 116) and his opponents as 'traytrous' (l. 114). Yet the overwhelming force of his own argument is that his reign was characterised by 'vices' (ll. 2 & 34), and that he 'fell / to make the living wise' (l.23).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work